These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29934748)

  • 1. Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: Further data.
    Craik FIM; Eftekhari E; Binns MA
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1263-1277. PubMed ID: 29934748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Gavrilescu D; Anderson ND
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep; 28(6):965-76. PubMed ID: 11105522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Toward specifying the attentional demands of recognition memory.
    Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1483-98. PubMed ID: 11185778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selective attention meets spontaneous recognition memory: Evidence for effects at retrieval.
    Moen KC; Miller JK; Lloyd ME
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Mar; 49():181-189. PubMed ID: 28214768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: the resiliency of retrieval processes.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Perretta JG; Tonev ST
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):609-25. PubMed ID: 10994220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of semantically related distractors during encoding and retrieval of words in long-term memory.
    Meade ME; Fernandes MA
    Memory; 2016 Jul; 24(6):801-11. PubMed ID: 26277934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.
    Weeks JC; Hasher L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 27900585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Memory encoding of syntactic information involves domain-general attentional resources: Evidence from dual-task studies.
    Heyselaar E; Segaert K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1285-1296. PubMed ID: 30185125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory networks supporting retrieval effort and retrieval success under conditions of full and divided attention.
    Skinner EI; Fernandes MA; Grady CL
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(6):386-96. PubMed ID: 19502200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of process interference on memory encoding and retrieval processes in dual-task situations.
    Hensen S; Koch I; Hirsch P
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Aug; 52(6):1246-1262. PubMed ID: 38436908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Creating a recollection-based memory through drawing.
    Wammes JD; Meade ME; Fernandes MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):734-751. PubMed ID: 29094984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task.
    Mate J; Baqués J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1277-84. PubMed ID: 19235099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The residual protective effects of enactment.
    Wammes JD; Fernandes MA
    Cognition; 2017 Jul; 164():87-101. PubMed ID: 28391135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence of Serial Processing in Visual Word Recognition.
    White AL; Palmer J; Boynton GM
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 29(7):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 29733752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Process-specific interference effects during recognition of spatial patterns and words.
    Fernandes M; Guild E
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 19271812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural correlates of auditory recognition under full and divided attention in younger and older adults.
    Fernandes MA; Pacurar A; Moscovitch M; Grady C
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2452-64. PubMed ID: 16769093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Divided attention in younger and older adults: effects of strategy and relatedness on memory performance and secondary task costs.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Guez J; Kreuger S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):520-37. PubMed ID: 15910135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register.
    Guez J; Naveh-Benjamin M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74447. PubMed ID: 24040249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding.
    Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2000 Jun; 129(2):155-76. PubMed ID: 10868332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concurrent task effects on memory retrieval.
    Rohrer D; Pashler HE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 12747495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.