These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29934889)

  • 1. (Q)SARs as Adaptations to REACH Information Requirements.
    Alasuvanto T; Gissi A; Sobanski T; Karamertzanis P; Rasenberg M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():107-115. PubMed ID: 29934889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between bioconcentration factor (BCF) data provided by industry to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and data derived from QSAR models.
    Petoumenou MI; Pizzo F; Cester J; Fernández A; Benfenati E
    Environ Res; 2015 Oct; 142():529-34. PubMed ID: 26282223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. QSAR Use in REACH Analyses of Alternatives to Predict Human Health and Environmental Toxicity of Alternative Chemical Substances.
    Chinen K; Malloy T
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Sep; 16(5):745-760. PubMed ID: 32162772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of the European centre for the validation of alternative methods (ECVAM) in the validation of (Q)SARs.
    Worth AP; Hartung T; Van Leeuwen CJ
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004; 15(5-6):345-58. PubMed ID: 15669694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-testing approaches under REACH--help or hindrance? Perspectives from a practitioner within industry.
    Patlewicz G; Chen MW; Bellin CA
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2011 Mar; 22(1-2):67-88. PubMed ID: 21391142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The European Union's REACH regulation: a review of its history and requirements.
    Williams ES; Panko J; Paustenbach DJ
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2009; 39(7):553-75. PubMed ID: 19650717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transparency of chemical risk assessment data under REACH.
    Ingre-Khans E; Ågerstrand M; Beronius A; Rudén C
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2016 Dec; 18(12):1508-1518. PubMed ID: 27819710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH.
    Ahlers J; Stock F; Werschkun B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Oct; 15(7):565-72. PubMed ID: 18818964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The prospects for using (Q)SARs in a changing political environment--high expectations and a key role for the European Commission's joint research centre.
    Worth AP; Van Leeuwen CJ; Hartung T
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2004; 15(5-6):331-43. PubMed ID: 15669693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An overall strategy for the testing of chemicals for human hazard and risk assessment under the EU REACH system.
    Combes R; Barratt M; Balls M
    Altern Lab Anim; 2003; 31(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 16221040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Olefins and chemical regulation in Europe: REACH.
    Penman M; Banton M; Erler S; Moore N; Semmler K
    Chem Biol Interact; 2015 Nov; 241():59-65. PubMed ID: 25861726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CATALOGIC 301C model - validation and improvement.
    Dimitrova NH; Dermen IA; Todorova ND; Vasilev KG; Dimitrov SD; Mekenyan OG; Ikenaga Y; Aoyagi T; Zaitsu Y; Hamaguchi C
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Jun; 28(6):511-524. PubMed ID: 28728491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Legal aspects of the REACH regulation. The control system of the REACH regulation--new approaches in the EU chemical legislation].
    Pache E
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2008 Dec; 51(12):1408-16. PubMed ID: 19137216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of the European Chemicals Bureau in promoting the regulatory use of (Q)SAR methods.
    Worth AP; Bassan A; De Bruijn J; Gallegos Saliner A; Netzeva T; Patlewicz G; Pavan M; Tsakovska I; Eisenreich S
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2007; 18(1-2):111-25. PubMed ID: 17365963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the number of EINECS compounds that can be covered by (Q)SAR models for acute toxicity.
    Zvinavashe E; Murk AJ; Rietjens IM
    Toxicol Lett; 2009 Jan; 184(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 19041378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Integrating process safety with molecular modeling-based risk assessment of chemicals within the REACH regulatory framework: benefits and future challenges.
    Lewis A; Kazantzis N; Fishtik I; Wilcox J
    J Hazard Mater; 2007 Apr; 142(3):592-602. PubMed ID: 16930827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. (Q)SARs: gatekeepers against risk on chemicals?
    Hulzebos EM; Posthumus R
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):285-316. PubMed ID: 14506871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Summary of a workshop on regulatory acceptance of (Q)SARs for human health and environmental endpoints.
    Jaworska JS; Comber M; Auer C; Van Leeuwen CJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Aug; 111(10):1358-60. PubMed ID: 12896859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Workshop: use of "read-across" for chemical safety assessment under REACH.
    Patlewicz G; Roberts DW; Aptula A; Blackburn K; Hubesch B
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Mar; 65(2):226-8. PubMed ID: 23266660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. European Chemicals Agency dossier submissions as an experimental data source: refinement of a fish toxicity model for predicting acute LC50 values.
    Austin T; Denoyelle M; Chaudry A; Stradling S; Eadsforth C
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Feb; 34(2):369-78. PubMed ID: 25470737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.