These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29934891)

  • 1. Applicability Domain: A Step Toward Confident Predictions and Decidability for QSAR Modeling.
    Kar S; Roy K; Leszczynski J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():141-169. PubMed ID: 29934891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. QSAR applicabilty domain estimation by projection of the training set descriptor space: a review.
    Jaworska J; Nikolova-Jeliazkova N; Aldenberg T
    Altern Lab Anim; 2005 Oct; 33(5):445-59. PubMed ID: 16268757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of different approaches to define the applicability domain of QSAR models.
    Sahigara F; Mansouri K; Ballabio D; Mauri A; Consonni V; Todeschini R
    Molecules; 2012 Apr; 17(5):4791-810. PubMed ID: 22534664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applicability domain: towards a more formal definition.
    Hanser T; Barber C; Marchaland JF; Werner S
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2016 Nov; 27(11):893-909. PubMed ID: 27827546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rank order entropy: why one metric is not enough.
    McLellan MR; Ryan MD; Breneman CM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Sep; 51(9):2302-19. PubMed ID: 21875058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The importance of the domain of applicability in QSAR modeling.
    Weaver S; Gleeson MP
    J Mol Graph Model; 2008 Jun; 26(8):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18328754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Study of the Applicability Domain of the QSAR Classification Models by Means of the Rivality and Modelability Indexes.
    Ruiz IL; Gómez-Nieto MÁ
    Molecules; 2018 Oct; 23(11):. PubMed ID: 30356020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of prediction confidence and domain extrapolation of two structure-activity relationship models for predicting estrogen receptor binding activity.
    Tong W; Xie Q; Hong H; Shi L; Fang H; Perkins R
    Environ Health Perspect; 2004 Aug; 112(12):1249-54. PubMed ID: 15345371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Structure Modification toward Applicability Domain of a QSAR/QSPR Model Considering Activity/Property.
    Ochi S; Miyao T; Funatsu K
    Mol Inform; 2017 Dec; 36(12):. PubMed ID: 28815921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Relative Importance of Domain Applicability Metrics for Estimating Prediction Errors in QSAR Varies with Training Set Diversity.
    Sheridan RP
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jun; 55(6):1098-107. PubMed ID: 25998559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An approach to determining applicability domains for QSAR group contribution models: an analysis of SRC KOWWIN.
    Nikolova-Jeliazkova N; Jaworska J
    Altern Lab Anim; 2005 Oct; 33(5):461-70. PubMed ID: 16268758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A novel QSAR model of Salmonella mutagenicity and its application in the safety assessment of drug impurities.
    Valencia A; Prous J; Mora O; Sadrieh N; Valerio LG
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 273(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 24090816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multispecies QSAR modeling for predicting the aquatic toxicity of diverse organic chemicals for regulatory toxicology.
    Singh KP; Gupta S; Kumar A; Mohan D
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2014 May; 27(5):741-53. PubMed ID: 24738471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combinatorial QSAR of ambergris fragrance compounds.
    Kovatcheva A; Golbraikh A; Oloff S; Xiao YD; Zheng W; Wolschann P; Buchbauer G; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):582-95. PubMed ID: 15032539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On various metrics used for validation of predictive QSAR models with applications in virtual screening and focused library design.
    Roy K; Mitra I
    Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2011 Jul; 14(6):450-74. PubMed ID: 21521150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Toward the prediction of class I and II mouse major histocompatibility complex-peptide-binding affinity: in silico bioinformatic step-by-step guide using quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Hattotuwagama CK; Doytchinova IA; Flower DR
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 409():227-45. PubMed ID: 18450004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In Silico Prediction of Compounds Binding to Human Plasma Proteins by QSAR Models.
    Sun L; Yang H; Li J; Wang T; Li W; Liu G; Tang Y
    ChemMedChem; 2018 Mar; 13(6):572-581. PubMed ID: 29057587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the development and validation of QSAR models.
    Gramatica P
    Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 930():499-526. PubMed ID: 23086855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three useful dimensions for domain applicability in QSAR models using random forest.
    Sheridan RP
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Mar; 52(3):814-23. PubMed ID: 22385389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of methods to define the applicability domain of structural alert models.
    Ellison CM; Sherhod R; Cronin MT; Enoch SJ; Madden JC; Judson PN
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 May; 51(5):975-85. PubMed ID: 21488656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.