These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29934909)

  • 1. Nontest Methods to Predict Acute Toxicity: State of the Art for Applications of In Silico Methods.
    Bureau R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():519-534. PubMed ID: 29934909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Results of a round-robin exercise on read-across.
    Benfenati E; Belli M; Borges T; Casimiro E; Cester J; Fernandez A; Gini G; Honma M; Kinzl M; Knauf R; Manganaro A; Mombelli E; Petoumenou MI; Paparella M; Paris P; Raitano G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2016 May; 27(5):371-84. PubMed ID: 27167159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comprehension of drug toxicity: software and databases.
    Toropov AA; Toropova AP; Raska I; Leszczynska D; Leszczynski J
    Comput Biol Med; 2014 Feb; 45():20-5. PubMed ID: 24480159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of computer based structure-activity relationships in the risk assessment of industrial chemicals.
    Karcher W; Karabunarliev S
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 1996; 36(4):672-7. PubMed ID: 8768762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. European Chemicals Agency dossier submissions as an experimental data source: refinement of a fish toxicity model for predicting acute LC50 values.
    Austin T; Denoyelle M; Chaudry A; Stradling S; Eadsforth C
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2015 Feb; 34(2):369-78. PubMed ID: 25470737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the Safety Assessment of Chemicals and Drug Candidates by the Integration of Bioinformatics and Chemoinformatics Data.
    Steger-Hartmann T; Pognan F
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2018 Sep; 123 Suppl 5():29-36. PubMed ID: 29316298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrating QSAR and read-across for environmental assessment.
    Benfenati E; Roncaglioni A; Petoumenou MI; Cappelli CI; Gini G
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2015; 26(7-9):605-18. PubMed ID: 26535447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. QSAR Use in REACH Analyses of Alternatives to Predict Human Health and Environmental Toxicity of Alternative Chemical Substances.
    Chinen K; Malloy T
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Sep; 16(5):745-760. PubMed ID: 32162772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Formation of mechanistic categories and local models to facilitate the prediction of toxicity.
    Cronin MT; Enoch SJ; Hewitt M; Madden JC
    ALTEX; 2011; 28(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 21311849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Classification of baseline toxicants for QSAR predictions to replace fish acute toxicity studies.
    Nendza M; Müller M; Wenzel A
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2017 Mar; 19(3):429-437. PubMed ID: 28165522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In Silico Approaches in Predictive Genetic Toxicology.
    Sinha M; Dhawan A; Parthasarathi R
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2031():351-373. PubMed ID: 31473971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of Draize eye irritation testing and its prediction by mining publicly available 2008-2014 REACH data.
    Luechtefeld T; Maertens A; Russo DP; Rovida C; Zhu H; Hartung T
    ALTEX; 2016; 33(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 26863293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Establishing the level of safety concern for chemicals in food without the need for toxicity testing.
    Schilter B; Benigni R; Boobis A; Chiodini A; Cockburn A; Cronin MT; Lo Piparo E; Modi S; Thiel A; Worth A
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2014 Mar; 68(2):275-96. PubMed ID: 24012706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between bioconcentration factor (BCF) data provided by industry to the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and data derived from QSAR models.
    Petoumenou MI; Pizzo F; Cester J; Fernández A; Benfenati E
    Environ Res; 2015 Oct; 142():529-34. PubMed ID: 26282223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying the benefits of using read-across and in silico techniques to fulfill hazard data requirements for chemical categories.
    Stanton K; Kruszewski FH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Nov; 81():250-259. PubMed ID: 27612993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of seven in silico tools for evaluating of daphnia and fish acute toxicity: case study on Chinese Priority Controlled Chemicals and new chemicals.
    Zhou L; Fan D; Yin W; Gu W; Wang Z; Liu J; Xu Y; Shi L; Liu M; Ji G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):151. PubMed ID: 33761866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conditional Toxicity Value (CTV) Predictor: An
    Wignall JA; Muratov E; Sedykh A; Guyton KZ; Tropsha A; Rusyn I; Chiu WA
    Environ Health Perspect; 2018 May; 126(5):057008. PubMed ID: 29847084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Grouping of nanomaterials to read-across hazard endpoints: from data collection to assessment of the grouping hypothesis by application of chemoinformatic techniques.
    Lamon L; Asturiol D; Richarz A; Joossens E; Graepel R; Aschberger K; Worth A
    Part Fibre Toxicol; 2018 Sep; 15(1):37. PubMed ID: 30249272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Global analysis of publicly available safety data for 9,801 substances registered under REACH from 2008-2014.
    Luechtefeld T; Maertens A; Russo DP; Rovida C; Zhu H; Hartung T
    ALTEX; 2016; 33(2):95-109. PubMed ID: 26863090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.