159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29934948)
1. Impact of pacemaker longevity on expected device replacement rates: Results from computer simulations based on a multicenter registry (ESSENTIAL).
Boriani G; Bertini M; Saporito D; Belotti G; Quartieri F; Tomasi C; Pucci A; Boggian G; Mazzocca GF; Giorgi D; Diotallevi P; Sassone B; Grassini D; Gargaro A; Biffi M;
Clin Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 41(9):1185-1191. PubMed ID: 29934948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic management of atrial and ventricular stimulation in a contemporary unselected population of pacemaker recipients: the ESSENTIAL Registry.
Biffi M; Bertini M; Saporito D; Belotti G; Quartieri F; Piancastelli M; Pucci A; Boggian G; Mazzocca GF; Giorgi D; Diotallevi P; Diemberger I; Martignani C; Pancaldi S; Ziacchi M; Marcantoni L; Toselli T; Attala S; Iori M; Bottoni N; Argnani S; Tomasi C; Sassone B; Boriani G
Europace; 2016 Oct; 18(10):1551-1560. PubMed ID: 27305923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety and efficiency of ventricular pacing prevention with an AAI-DDD changeover mode in patients with sinus node disease or atrioventricular block: impact on battery longevity-a sub-study of the ANSWER trial.
Stockburger M; Defaye P; Boveda S; Stancak B; Lazarus A; Sipötz J; Nardi S; Rolando M; Moreno J
Europace; 2016 May; 18(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 26612882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Telemetry guided pacemaker programming: impact of output amplitude and the use of low threshold leads on projected pacemaker longevity.
Schwaab B; Fröhlig G; Schwerdt H; Heisel A; Berg M; Schieffer H
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 1):2055-63. PubMed ID: 9826856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Pacemaker longevity. Replacement of the device].
Deharo JC; Djiane P
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2005 Jan; 54(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 15702908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized study on the effects of pacemaker programming to a lower output on projected pulse generator longevity.
Schuchert A; Meinertz T;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 24(8 Pt 1):1234-9. PubMed ID: 11523609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single-chamber leadless pacemaker for atrial synchronous or ventricular pacing.
Hai JJ; Chan YH; Lau CP; Tse HF
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2020 Dec; 43(12):1438-1450. PubMed ID: 33089883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of pacemaker automatic capture management and atrioventricular interval extension algorithm.
Chen KP; Xu G; Wu S; Tang B; Wang L; Zhang S;
Europace; 2013 Mar; 15(3):395-401. PubMed ID: 23243132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefits of the advances in cardiac pacemaker technology.
Shakespeare CF; Camm AJ
Clin Cardiol; 1992 Aug; 15(8):601-6. PubMed ID: 1499189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Economic and health consequences of managing bradycardia with dual-chamber compared to single-chamber ventricular pacemakers in Italy.
Deniz HB; Caro JJ; Ward A; Moller J; Malik F
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2008 Jan; 9(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 18268418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Benefits in projected pacemaker longevity and in pacing related costs conferred by automatic threshold tracking.
Boriani G; Biffi M; Branzi A; Mininno A; Sigliano R;
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Nov; 23(11 Pt 2):1783-7. PubMed ID: 11139923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing pacemaker longevity with pacing mode and settings programming: results from a pacemaker multicenter registry.
Benkemoun H; Sacrez J; Lagrange P; Amiel A; Prakash A; Himmrich E; Aimè E; Mairesse GH; Guénon C; Sbragia P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2012 Apr; 35(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 22309354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pacemaker replacement in nonagenarians: Procedural safety and long-term follow-up.
Loirat A; Fénéon D; Behaghel A; Behar N; Le Helloco A; Mabo P; Daubert JC; Leclercq C; Martins RP
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015; 108(6-7):367-74. PubMed ID: 26141325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of daily remote monitoring on pacemaker longevity: a retrospective analysis.
Ricci RP; Morichelli L; Quarta L; Porfili A; Magris B; Giovene L; Torcinaro S; Gargaro A
Heart Rhythm; 2015 Feb; 12(2):330-7. PubMed ID: 25444853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical experience with pacemaker pulse generators and transvenous leads: an 8-year prospective multicenter study.
Hauser RG; Hayes DL; Kallinen LM; Cannom DS; Epstein AE; Almquist AK; Song SL; Tyers GF; Vlay SC; Irwin M
Heart Rhythm; 2007 Feb; 4(2):154-60. PubMed ID: 17275749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic assessment of atrial pacing threshold in current medical practice.
Rey JL; Quenum S; Hero M
Europace; 2012 Nov; 14(11):1615-9. PubMed ID: 22510456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of a new cardiac pacing mode designed to eliminate unnecessary ventricular pacing.
Fröhlig G; Gras D; Victor J; Mabo P; Galley D; Savouré A; Jauvert G; Defaye P; Ducloux P; Amblard A
Europace; 2006 Feb; 8(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 16627417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Permanent pacemakers in older persons.
Gregoratos G
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1999 Sep; 47(9):1125-35. PubMed ID: 10484258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ventricular capture management in pediatric pacing: efficacy and safety.
Silvetti MS; De Santis A; Grutter G; Di Ciommo V; Drago F
Ital Heart J; 2005 Sep; 6(9):751-6. PubMed ID: 16212078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of successful atrial and ventricular auto capture pacemaker algorithm post implantation: single-centre experience.
Hacioglu E; Mugnai G; Czapla J; Nijs J; Wellens F; Schoors D; La Meir M; Chierchia GB; Brugada P; De Asmundis C
Acta Cardiol; 2016; 71(5):612-615. PubMed ID: 27695020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
