These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29934980)

  • 1. Effect of different scoring approaches upon credit assignment when using Multiple True-False items in dental undergraduate examinations.
    Kanzow P; Schuelper N; Witt D; Wassmann T; Sennhenn-Kirchner S; Wiegand A; Raupach T
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 Nov; 22(4):e669-e678. PubMed ID: 29934980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of Multiple-Select Multiple-Choice Items in a Dental Undergraduate Curriculum: Retrospective Study Involving the Application of Different Scoring Methods.
    Kanzow P; Schmidt D; Herrmann M; Wassmann T; Wiegand A; Raupach T
    JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Mar; 9():e43792. PubMed ID: 36841970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multiple true-false items: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
    Lahner FM; Lörwald AC; Bauer D; Nouns ZM; Krebs R; Guttormsen S; Fischer MR; Huwendiek S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 23(3):455-463. PubMed ID: 29189963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of Multiple-Choice Items in Summative Examinations: Questionnaire Survey Among German Undergraduate Dental Training Programs.
    Rössler L; Herrmann M; Wiegand A; Kanzow P
    JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Jun; 10():e58126. PubMed ID: 38952022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pick-N multiple choice-exams: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
    Bauer D; Holzer M; Kopp V; Fischer MR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 May; 16(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 21038082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. It takes only 100 true-false items to test medical students: true or false?
    Pamphlett R
    Med Teach; 2005 Aug; 27(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 16147803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of a 'don't know' option on test scores: number-right and formula scoring compared.
    Muijtjens AM; Mameren HV; Hoogenboom RJ; Evers JL; van der Vleuten CP
    Med Educ; 1999 Apr; 33(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 10336757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Scoring Single-Response Multiple-Choice Items: Scoping Review and Comparison of Different Scoring Methods.
    Kanzow AF; Schmidt D; Kanzow P
    JMIR Med Educ; 2023 May; 9():e44084. PubMed ID: 37001510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dropping the non-core subjects from undergraduate final professional examination: How it would impact the results.
    Thomas P; Nariman S; Shaz AR; Sabrina L; Chai CC; Mizanur R
    Med J Malaysia; 2022 Mar; 77(2):169-173. PubMed ID: 35338623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. First reported implementation of a German-language progress test in an undergraduate dental curriculum: A prospective study.
    Kirnbauer B; Avian A; Jakse N; Rugani P; Ithaler D; Egger R
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 Nov; 22(4):e698-e705. PubMed ID: 29961963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of Multiple True or False Options with Negative Scoring Schemes Against Single Best of Five Answer Options in a Medical School.
    Anyabolu EN; Chukwuonye II; Okoye IC; Ufoaroh CU; Anyabolu AE; Dike KC
    West Afr J Med; 2020 Dec; 37(7):819-824. PubMed ID: 33296494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multiple choice questions revisited.
    Anderson J
    Med Teach; 2004 Mar; 26(2):110-3. PubMed ID: 15203517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test-retest reliability of multiple true-false questions in preclinical medical subjects.
    Schwartz PL; Crooks TJ; Sein KT
    Med Educ; 1986 Sep; 20(5):399-406. PubMed ID: 3762442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Usage of Multiple-Choice Items in Summative Examinations: Questionnaire Survey Among German Undergraduate Dental Training Programmes.
    Rössler L; Herrmann M; Wiegand A; Kanzow P
    JMIR Med Educ; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38712378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using multiple response true-false multiple choice questions.
    Bandaranayake R; Payne J; White S
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1999 Apr; 69(4):311-5. PubMed ID: 10327124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A reappraisal of the use of multiple choice questions.
    Premadasa IG
    Med Teach; 1993; 15(2-3):237-42. PubMed ID: 8246720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective implementation of correction for guessing in oral and maxillofacial pathology multiple-choice examinations: did student performance improve?
    Prihoda TJ; Pinckard RN; McMahan CA; Littlefield JH; Jones AC
    J Dent Educ; 2008 Oct; 72(10):1149-59. PubMed ID: 18923095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the difficulty, reliability and validity of complex multiple choice, multiple response and multiple true-false items.
    Albanese MA; Kent TH; Whitney DR
    Annu Conf Res Med Educ; 1977; 16():105-110. PubMed ID: 606061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using automatic item generation to create multiple-choice test items.
    Gierl MJ; Lai H; Turner SR
    Med Educ; 2012 Aug; 46(8):757-65. PubMed ID: 22803753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validating a multiple mini-interview question bank assessing entry-level reasoning skills in candidates for graduate-entry medicine and dentistry programmes.
    Roberts C; Zoanetti N; Rothnie I
    Med Educ; 2009 Apr; 43(4):350-9. PubMed ID: 19335577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.