186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29935153)
1. Myoelectric Prosthesis Users Improve Performance Time and Accuracy Using Vibrotactile Feedback When Visual Feedback Is Disturbed.
Raveh E; Portnoy S; Friedman J
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2018 Nov; 99(11):2263-2270. PubMed ID: 29935153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of the effects of adding vibrotactile feedback to myoelectric prosthesis users on performance and visual attention in a dual-task paradigm.
Raveh E; Friedman J; Portnoy S
Clin Rehabil; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 29756458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adding vibrotactile feedback to a myoelectric-controlled hand improves performance when online visual feedback is disturbed.
Raveh E; Portnoy S; Friedman J
Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Apr; 58():32-40. PubMed ID: 29353091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visuomotor behaviors and performance in a dual-task paradigm with and without vibrotactile feedback when using a myoelectric controlled hand.
Raveh E; Friedman J; Portnoy S
Assist Technol; 2018; 30(5):274-280. PubMed ID: 28628379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of vibrotactile feedback and grasp interface compliance on perception and control of a sensorized myoelectric hand.
Pena AE; Rincon-Gonzalez L; Abbas JJ; Jung R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0210956. PubMed ID: 30650161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users.
Witteveen HJ; Rietman HS; Veltink PH
Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 24567348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraneural sensory feedback restores grip force control and motor coordination while using a prosthetic hand.
Clemente F; Valle G; Controzzi M; Strauss I; Iberite F; Stieglitz T; Granata G; Rossini PM; Petrini F; Micera S; Cipriani C
J Neural Eng; 2019 Apr; 16(2):026034. PubMed ID: 30736030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tactile feedback is an effective instrument for the training of grasping with a prosthesis at low- and medium-force levels.
De Nunzio AM; Dosen S; Lemling S; Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Ge N; Graimann B; Falla D; Farina D
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Aug; 235(8):2547-2559. PubMed ID: 28550423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis.
Dosen S; Markovic M; Somer K; Graimann B; Farina D
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 12():55. PubMed ID: 26088323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensory substitution of elbow proprioception to improve myoelectric control of upper limb prosthesis: experiment on healthy subjects and amputees.
Guémann M; Halgand C; Bastier A; Lansade C; Borrini L; Lapeyre É; Cattaert D; de Rugy A
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2022 Jun; 19(1):59. PubMed ID: 35690860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Myocontrol is closed-loop control: incidental feedback is sufficient for scaling the prosthesis force in routine grasping.
Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Engels LF; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Sep; 15(1):81. PubMed ID: 30176929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Getting a Grip on the Impact of Incidental Feedback From Body-Powered and Myoelectric Prostheses.
Gonzalez MA; Lee C; Kang J; Gillespie RB; Gates DH
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():1905-1912. PubMed ID: 34516377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design and technical construction of a tactile display for sensory feedback in a hand prosthesis system.
Antfolk C; Balkenius C; Lundborg G; Rosén B; Sebelius F
Biomed Eng Online; 2010 Sep; 9():50. PubMed ID: 20840758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of vibrotactile and joint-torque feedback in a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis.
Thomas N; Ung G; McGarvey C; Brown JD
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jun; 16(1):70. PubMed ID: 31186005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Interaction Between Feedback Type and Learning in Routine Grasping With Myoelectric Prostheses.
Wilke MA; Hartmann C; Schimpf F; Farina D; Dosen S
IEEE Trans Haptics; 2020; 13(3):645-654. PubMed ID: 31870991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychometric characterization of incidental feedback sources during grasping with a hand prosthesis.
Wilke MA; Niethammer C; Meyer B; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Dec; 16(1):155. PubMed ID: 31823792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The clinical relevance of advanced artificial feedback in the control of a multi-functional myoelectric prosthesis.
Markovic M; Schweisfurth MA; Engels LF; Bentz T; Wüstefeld D; Farina D; Dosen S
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 Mar; 15(1):28. PubMed ID: 29580245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intermanual Transfer Effects in Below-Elbow Myoelectric Prosthesis Users.
de Boer E; Romkema S; Cutti AG; Brouwers MA; Bongers RM; van der Sluis CK
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Nov; 97(11):1924-1930. PubMed ID: 27240431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrotactile Feedback Improves Grip Force Control and Enables Object Stiffness Recognition While Using a Myoelectric Hand.
Chai G; Wang H; Li G; Sheng X; Zhu X
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022; 30():1310-1320. PubMed ID: 35533165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-Invasive, Temporally Discrete Feedback of Object Contact and Release Improves Grasp Control of Closed-Loop Myoelectric Transradial Prostheses.
Clemente F; D'Alonzo M; Controzzi M; Edin BB; Cipriani C
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2016 Dec; 24(12):1314-1322. PubMed ID: 26584497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
