223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29935263)
1. The National Resident Matching Program Code of Conduct: What Is the Perceived Degree of Compliance During the Urology Match Process?
Sebesta EM; Lipsky MJ; Nunez M; Cooper KL; Badalato GM
Urology; 2018 Dec; 122():37-43. PubMed ID: 29935263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Urology Match and Postinterview Communication.
Farber NJ; Neylan CJ; Kaplan A; Singer EA; Elsamra SE
Urology; 2018 Dec; 122():44-51. PubMed ID: 29935262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Urology Match Process and the Limited Value of Post-Interview Communication for Program Directors.
Farber NJ; Neylan CJ; Srivastava A; Pandya SS; Kaplan A; Radadia KD; Singer EA; Elsamra SE
Urology; 2019 Jun; 128():23-30. PubMed ID: 30844386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contemporary Assessment of Match Violations within Urology: an Opportunity for Ethical Leadership.
Balen A; Fantasia J; Thavaseelan S
Curr Urol Rep; 2019 Sep; 20(10):65. PubMed ID: 31493164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Post-Interview Communication During Application to Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs.
Brooks JT; Reidler JS; Jain A; LaPorte DM; Sterling RS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Oct; 98(19):e84. PubMed ID: 27707858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applicant Interview Experiences and Postinterview Communication of the 2016 Radiation Oncology Match Cycle.
Berriochoa C; Ward MC; Weller MA; Holliday E; Kusano A; Thomas CR; Tendulkar RD
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Nov; 96(3):514-20. PubMed ID: 27681747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Residency Match: Interview Experiences, Postinterview Communication, and Associated Distress.
Berriochoa C; Reddy CA; Dorsey S; Campbell S; Poblete-Lopez C; Schlenk R; Spencer A; Lee J; Eagleton M; Tendulkar RD
J Grad Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 10(4):403-408. PubMed ID: 30154970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Integrity of the National Resident Matching Program for Radiation Oncology: National Survey of Applicant Experiences.
Holliday EB; Thomas CR; Kusano AS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(3):525-31. PubMed ID: 25936811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peri-Interview Communication in the Otolaryngology Residency Match: The Applicant Perspective.
Masciello M; Malekzadeh S
Laryngoscope; 2021 Jan; 131(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 32065402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How Prevalent Are Potentially Illegal Questions During Residency Interviews? A Follow-up Study of Applicants to All Specialties in the National Resident Matching Program.
Hern HG; Trivedi T; Alter HJ; Wills CP
Acad Med; 2016 Nov; 91(11):1546-1553. PubMed ID: 27049540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The prevalence and nature of postinterview communications between residency programs and applicants during the match.
Jena AB; Arora VM; Hauer KE; Durning S; Borges N; Oriol N; Elnicki DM; Fagan MJ; Harrell HE; Torre D; Prochaska M; Meltzer DO; Reddy S
Acad Med; 2012 Oct; 87(10):1434-42. PubMed ID: 22914523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The urology residency matching program in practice.
Teichman JM; Anderson KD; Dorough MM; Stein CR; Optenberg SA; Thompson IM
J Urol; 2000 Jun; 163(6):1878-87. PubMed ID: 10799214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in Post-Interview Communication Practices.
Harvey RS; Kovatch KJ; Prince MEP; Malloy KM; Thorne MC
Laryngoscope; 2019 Mar; 129(3):607-612. PubMed ID: 30247746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding the Urology Program Directors Perspective on the Current Resident Selection Process: The Society of Academic Urologists National Survey of Urology Program Directors.
Movassaghi M; Lemack GE; Badalato GM; Broderick G; Greene K; Ibeziako O; Mirza M; Murphy A; Thavaseelan S; Wolter C; Takacs E
J Surg Educ; 2023 Jun; 80(6):900-906. PubMed ID: 36914481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Professionalism and the match: a pediatric residency program's postinterview no-call policy and its impact on applicants.
Opel D; Shugerman R; McPhillips H; Swanson WS; Archibald S; Diekema D
Pediatrics; 2007 Oct; 120(4):e826-31. PubMed ID: 17768182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interview experience, post-interview communication, and gender-based differences in the integrated vascular surgery residency match.
Fereydooni A; Ramirez JL; Morrow KL; Sorondo S; Lee JT; Coleman DM; Chandra V
J Vasc Surg; 2022 Jan; 75(1):316-322.e2. PubMed ID: 34197947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fixing the match: a survey of resident behaviors.
Nagarkar PA; Janis JE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Sep; 132(3):711-719. PubMed ID: 23676970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationship Between Postinterview Correspondence From Residency Program Applicants and Subsequent Applicant Match Outcomes.
Swan EC; Baudendistel TE
J Grad Med Educ; 2014 Sep; 6(3):478-83. PubMed ID: 26279772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The COVID-19 Residency Application Cycle Did Not Affect Geographic Dispersal Patterns Among Applicants Entering the Urology Match: A Quantitative Mapping Study.
Gabrielson AT; Meilchen CK; Kohn JR; Kohn TP
Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():26-32. PubMed ID: 34324912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A follow-up survey of the integrity of the dermatology National Resident Matching Program.
Sbicca JA; Gorell ES; Peng DH; Lane AT
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2012 Sep; 67(3):429-35. PubMed ID: 22088426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
