223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29935263)
41. Navigating the Ophthalmology & Urology Match with a Significant Other.
Massenzio SS; Uhler TA; Massenzio EM; Sun E; Srikumaran D; Clifton MM; Green LK; Sun G; Wang J; Woreta FA
J Surg Educ; 2023 Jan; 80(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 35965228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Program directors' criteria for selection into urology residency.
Weissbart SJ; Stock JA; Wein AJ
Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):731-6. PubMed ID: 25817098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Financial and educational costs of the residency interview process for urology applicants.
Kerfoot BP; Asher KP; McCullough DL
Urology; 2008 Jun; 71(6):990-4. PubMed ID: 18295310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Ethical violations and discriminatory behavior in the MedPhys Match.
Hendrickson KRG; Juang T; Rodrigues A; Burmeister JW
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 18(5):336-350. PubMed ID: 28834035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Away Rotations, Interviews, and Rank Lists: Radiation Oncology Residency Applicant Perspectives on the 2020 Match Process.
Taparra K; Ebner DK; De La Cruz D; Holliday EB
Adv Radiat Oncol; 2021; 6(4):100696. PubMed ID: 34113741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A Comparison of Matched and Unmatched Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Applicants from 2006 to 2014: Data from the National Resident Matching Program.
Schrock JB; Kraeutler MJ; Dayton MR; McCarty EC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jan; 99(1):e1. PubMed ID: 28060237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Postinterview communication between military residency applicants and training programs.
Ratcliffe TA; Durning SJ; Jena AB; Grau T; Artino AR; Arora VM; Hauer KE; Borges N; Oriol N; Elnicki DM; Fagan MJ; Harrell HE; Torre DM; Prochaska M; Meltzer DO; Reddy S
Mil Med; 2012 Sep; 177(9 Suppl):54-60. PubMed ID: 23029863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. How prevalent are potentially illegal questions during residency interviews?
Hern HG; Alter HJ; Wills CP; Snoey ER; Simon BC
Acad Med; 2013 Aug; 88(8):1116-21. PubMed ID: 23807097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Post-interview Thank-you Communications Influence Both Applicant and Residency Program Rank Lists in Emergency Medicine.
Jewell C; David T; Kraut A; Hess J; Westergaard M; Schnapp BH
West J Emerg Med; 2019 Dec; 21(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 31913827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The plastic surgery match: predicting success and improving the process.
Claiborne JR; Crantford JC; Swett KR; David LR
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jun; 70(6):698-703. PubMed ID: 23673567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The Presence of Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendations Written for Urology Residency Applicants.
Filippou P; Mahajan S; Deal A; Wallen EM; Tan HJ; Pruthi RS; Smith AB
Urology; 2019 Dec; 134():56-61. PubMed ID: 31491451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Recent trends in applicants and the matching process for the integrated plastic surgery match.
Super N; Tieman J; Boucher K; Rockwell WB; Agarwal JP
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 23407248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Neurosurgery Resident Interviews: The Prevalence and Impact of Inappropriate and Potentially Illegal Questions.
Limoges N; Zuckerman SL; Chambless LB; Benzil DL; Cruz A; Borden JH; Durham S
Neurosurgery; 2021 Jun; 89(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 33733664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The Applicant's Perspective on Urology Residency Interviews: A Qualitative Analysis.
Zhao H; Souders CP; Freedman A; Breyer BN; Anger JT
Urology; 2020 Aug; 142():43-48. PubMed ID: 32407753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Preference Signaling and Virtual Interviews: The New Urology Residency Match.
Carpinito GP; Badia RR; Khouri RK; Ganesan V; Kenigsberg AP; Hudak SJ; Lemack GE
Urology; 2023 Jan; 171():35-40. PubMed ID: 36332703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Preference Signaling in the 2022 Urology Residency Match - The Applicant Perspective.
Leopold Z; Rajagopalan A; Mikhail M; Lee G; Tabakin A; Park JH; Jang T; Elsamra SE; Singer EA
Urology; 2022 Dec; 170():33-37. PubMed ID: 36195167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Emergency medicine residency director perceptions of the resident selection process.
Wolford RW; Anderson KD
Acad Emerg Med; 2000 Oct; 7(10):1170-1. PubMed ID: 11015278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Have We Come as Far as We Had Hoped? Discrimination in the Residency Interview.
Hessel K; DiPasco P; Kilgore L; Shelley C; Perry A; Wagner J
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(6):939-945. PubMed ID: 28483440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The Urology Applicant: An Analysis of Contemporary Urology Residency Candidates.
Lebastchi AH; Khouri RK; McLaren ID; Faerber GJ; Kraft KH; Hafez KS; Dauw CA; Bird VG; Stringer TF; Singla AK; Sorensen MD; Wessells H; Ambani SN
Urology; 2018 May; 115():51-58. PubMed ID: 29408686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. How well will you FIT? Use of a modified MMI to assess applicants' compatibility with an emergency medicine residency program.
Min AA; Leetch A; Nuño T; Fiorello AB
Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():29587. PubMed ID: 26842824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
