These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29935263)

  • 61. Applicants' opinions about the selection process for oral and maxillofacial surgery programs.
    Marciani RD; Smith TA; Heaton LJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 May; 61(5):608-14. PubMed ID: 12730841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Crowd-Sourced Assessment of Surgical Skills of Urology Resident Applicants: Four-Year Experience.
    Karani R; Tapiero S; Jefferson FA; Vernez S; Xie L; Larson KN; Osann K; Okhunov Z; Patel RM; Landman J; Clayman RV; Stephany HA
    J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(6):2030-2037. PubMed ID: 34147416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process: An Analysis of the Applicant Experience.
    Ramkumar PN; Navarro SM; Chughtai M; Haeberle HS; Taylor SA; Mont MA
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 26(15):537-544. PubMed ID: 29870416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The "Independent" Plastic Surgery Match: Analysis of Changes in Recent Years and Applicant Preferences.
    Hammoudeh ZS; Mostafa G; Saint-Cyr M; Bakri K; Mardini S
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 27886967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Factors important to anesthesiology residency applicants during recruitment.
    Long T; Dodd S; Licatino L; Rose S
    J Educ Perioper Med; 2017; 19(2):E604. PubMed ID: 28824937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. The Urology Residency Interview: Prevalence of Potentially Discriminatory Questions and the Financial Burden on Applicants.
    Capoccia E; Coogan C
    Urol Pract; 2019 Sep; 6(5):327-330. PubMed ID: 37317337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Virtual "Matchmaking": Stakeholder Perspectives on the Future of the Urology Residency Match.
    Warren CJ; Reitblat CR; Ferreri CA; Eyrich NW; Daignault-Newton S; Andino JJ; Sadeghi-Nejad H; Pruthi RS; Kraft KH
    Urology; 2022 Jun; 164():11-17. PubMed ID: 35263640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Use and utility of Web-based residency program information: a survey of residency applicants.
    Embi PJ; Desai S; Cooney TG
    J Med Internet Res; 2003; 5(3):e22. PubMed ID: 14517113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Gender Differences in the Urology Residency Match-Does It Make a Difference?
    Aisen CM; Sui W; Pak JS; Pagano M; Cooper KL; Badalato GM
    Urology; 2018 Jan; 111():39-43. PubMed ID: 28943372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Twitter and Instagram Use in the Urology Residency Application Process.
    Carpinito GP; Caldwell KM; Kenigsberg AP; Ganesan V; Khouri RK; Kuprasertkul A; Hudak SJ; Lemack GE
    Urology; 2022 Jan; 159():22-27. PubMed ID: 34637837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Assuring Integrity in the Residency Match Process.
    Chimienti SN; DeMarco DM; Flotte TR; Collins MF
    Acad Med; 2019 Mar; 94(3):321-323. PubMed ID: 30431456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Applicants' Perspectives of the Urology Residency Match Process.
    Khouri RK; Joyner BD; Lemack GE
    Urol Pract; 2019 May; 6(3):185-190. PubMed ID: 37300094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. #AUAMatch: The Impact of COVID-19 on Social Media Use in the Urology Residency Match.
    Ho P; Margolin E; Sebesta E; Small A; Badalato GM
    Urology; 2021 Aug; 154():50-56. PubMed ID: 34033828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Modeling the Urology Residency Application and Match Process: A Mathematical Argument for Application and Interview Caps.
    Farooq S; Mehta A
    Urology; 2023 Mar; 173():48-54. PubMed ID: 36572222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The Future is Female: The Influence of Female Faculty and Resident Representation on Female Applicant Match Rate Amongst Urology Residency Programs Over 3 Years.
    Kapur A; Hung M; Wang K; Gross M; Lee W; Weissbart S; Kim J
    Urology; 2022 Feb; 160():46-50. PubMed ID: 34740713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Challenges Facing Program Directors in the Urology Match.
    Weissbart SJ; Stock JA; Wein AJ
    Urol Pract; 2016 Nov; 3(6):486-492. PubMed ID: 37592596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Ophthalmology Residency Match outcomes for 2011.
    Yousuf SJ; Jones LS
    Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):642-6. PubMed ID: 22218141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residency match: applicant survey.
    Lansford CD; Fisher SR; Ossoff RH; Chole RA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Sep; 130(9):1017-23. PubMed ID: 15381585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Change to an informal interview dress code improves residency applicant perceptions.
    Hern HG; Wills CP; Johnson B
    West J Emerg Med; 2015 Jan; 16(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 25671021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Improving the Residency Program Virtual Open House Experience: A Survey of Urology Applicants.
    Jiang J; Key P; Deibert CM
    Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():1-3. PubMed ID: 33049230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.