These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29935769)
21. Dynamic fatigue and fracture resistance of non-retentive all-ceramic full-coverage molar restorations. Influence of ceramic material and preparation design. Clausen JO; Abou Tara M; Kern M Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 20181388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In-vitro comparison of fracture resistance of CAD/CAM porcelain restorations for endodontically treated molars. Uzun İ; Timur AH; Şenel K BMC Oral Health; 2024 Oct; 24(1):1187. PubMed ID: 39369196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis. Skalskyi V; Makeev V; Stankevych O; Pavlychko R Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):e46-e55. PubMed ID: 29409675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Biomechanical behavior and Weibull survival of CAD-CAM endocrowns with different marginal designs: A 3D finite element analysis. AboElhassan RG; Watts DC; Alamoush RA; Elraggal A Dent Mater; 2024 Feb; 40(2):227-235. PubMed ID: 37977990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Short communication: Influence of restorative material and cement on the stress distribution of posterior resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses: 3D finite element analysis. Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AMO; de Melo RM; Borges ALS; Bottino MA; Özcan M J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Aug; 96():279-284. PubMed ID: 31077955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. CAD-FE modeling and analysis of class II restorations incorporating resin-composite, glass ionomer and glass ceramic materials. Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Gloria A; Watts DC Dent Mater; 2017 Dec; 33(12):1456-1465. PubMed ID: 29128128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Crown fracture: Failure load, stress distribution, and fractographic analysis. Campos RE; Soares PV; Versluis A; de O Júnior OB; Ambrosano GM; Nunes IF J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 26001492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Finite element and Weibull analyses to estimate failure risks in the ceramic endocrown and classical crown for endodontically treated maxillary premolar. Lin CL; Chang YH; Chang CY; Pai CA; Huang SF Eur J Oral Sci; 2010 Feb; 118(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 20156270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of restorative material and cement on the stress distribution of endocrowns: 3D finite element analysis. He J; Zheng Z; Wu M; Zheng C; Zeng Y; Yan W BMC Oral Health; 2021 Oct; 21(1):495. PubMed ID: 34610825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In vitro study of fracture load and fracture pattern of ceramic crowns: a finite element and fractography analysis. Campos RE; Soares CJ; Quagliatto PS; Soares PV; de Oliveira OB; Santos-Filho PC; Salazar-Marocho SM J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 21843228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Survival of resin infiltrated ceramics under influence of fatigue. Aboushelib MN; Elsafi MH Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 26764178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling. Ausiello P; Ciaramella S; Fabianelli A; Gloria A; Martorelli M; Lanzotti A; Watts DC Dent Mater; 2017 Jun; 33(6):690-701. PubMed ID: 28413061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis. Helal MA; Wang Z J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):988-996. PubMed ID: 29067737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics. Lin WS; Ercoli C; Feng C; Morton D J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 22462639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. One-piece endodontic crown fixed partial denture: Is it possible? Tribst JPM; Dal Piva AMO; Muris J; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1118-1125. PubMed ID: 36801103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Estimation of the risk of failure for an endodontically treated maxillary premolar with MODP preparation and CAD/CAM ceramic restorations. Lin CL; Chang YH; Pa CA J Endod; 2009 Oct; 35(10):1391-5. PubMed ID: 19801237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fracture resistance and failure modes of polymer infiltrated ceramic endocrown restorations with variations in margin design and occlusal thickness. Taha D; Spintzyk S; Schille C; Sabet A; Wahsh M; Salah T; Geis-Gerstorfer J J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):293-297. PubMed ID: 29241944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of the crown design and interface lute parameters on the stress-state of a machined crown-tooth system: a finite element analysis. Shahrbaf S; vanNoort R; Mirzakouchaki B; Ghassemieh E; Martin N Dent Mater; 2013 Aug; 29(8):e123-31. PubMed ID: 23706694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]