BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

581 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29936062)

  • 21. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
    Lu FL; Matteson S
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relation Between Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) and Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
    Ataee E; Khoramshahi H; Naderifar E; Dastoorpour M
    J Voice; 2022 May; 36(3):435.e1-435.e14. PubMed ID: 32753294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Dysphonia: A Comparison Between Narrow and Broad Terminology Systems.
    Iwarsson J; Bingen-Jakobsen A; Johansen DS; Kølle IE; Pedersen SG; Thorsen SL; Petersen NR
    J Voice; 2018 Jul; 32(4):428-436. PubMed ID: 28802788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
    Maryn Y; Kim HT; Kim J
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical versus laboratory ratings of voice using the CAPE-V.
    Solomon NP; Helou LB; Stojadinovic A
    J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):e7-14. PubMed ID: 20430573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of listener experience on Consensus Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) ratings of postthyroidectomy voice.
    Helou LB; Solomon NP; Henry LR; Coppit GL; Howard RS; Stojadinovic A
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Aug; 19(3):248-58. PubMed ID: 20484704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.
    Pommée T; Maryn Y; Finck C; Morsomme D
    J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e11-646.e26. PubMed ID: 30598420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI): Validation in European Portuguese Children.
    Guimarães I; Almeida L; Quintal A; Batista AP; Teixeira A; Romeiro C; Ferreira DB; Fernandes IS; Saraiva M; Bom R; Almeida S; Freitas SV
    J Voice; 2023 Sep; 37(5):804.e11-804.e19. PubMed ID: 34183214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of Terminology and the Effect of Training on Auditory-Perceptual Ratings of Speaking Voice by Singing Teachers.
    Walstrom A; Brehm SB; LeBorgne WD; Acord A; Gottliebson RO
    J Voice; 2024 Mar; 38(2):543.e1-543.e11. PubMed ID: 34782224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
    Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Quality of Cochlear-implanted and Normal-hearing Individuals: A Reliability Study.
    Coelho AC; Brasolotto AG; Fernandes ACN; de Souza Medved DM; da Silva EM; Júnior FB
    J Voice; 2017 Nov; 31(6):774.e1-774.e8. PubMed ID: 28318969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Influence of Native Language on Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Vocal Samples Completed by Brazilian and Canadian SLPs.
    Chaves CR; Campbell M; Côrtes Gama AC
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):258.e1-258.e5. PubMed ID: 27427162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory Training With Synthesized Voice Anchors: Effects on Rater Agreement.
    Gama ACC; da Mata SM; Martins Dos Santos PC; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Quinino RDC
    J Voice; 2024 Mar; 38(2):366-375. PubMed ID: 34702611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reliability of clinician-based (GRBAS and CAPE-V) and patient-based (V-RQOL and IPVI) documentation of voice disorders.
    Karnell MP; Melton SD; Childes JM; Coleman TC; Dailey SA; Hoffman HT
    J Voice; 2007 Sep; 21(5):576-90. PubMed ID: 16822648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of visual feedback and training in auditory-perceptual judgment of voice quality.
    Barsties B; Beers M; Ten Cate L; Van Ballegooijen K; Braam L; De Groot M; Van Der Kant M; Kruitwagen C; Maryn Y
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2017 Apr; 42(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 26525078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sustained vowels and continuous speech in the auditory-perceptual evaluation of dysphonia severity.
    Maryn Y; Roy N
    J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol; 2012; 24(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 22832675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perceptual and Quantitative Assessment of Dysphonia Across Vowel Categories.
    Anand S; Skowronski MD; Shrivastav R; Eddins DA
    J Voice; 2019 Jul; 33(4):473-481. PubMed ID: 29804803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Audio-perceptual evaluation of Portuguese voice disorders-an inter- and intrajudge reliability study.
    Vaz Freitas S; Pestana PM; Almeida V; Ferreira A
    J Voice; 2014 Mar; 28(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 24050822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliability and Validity of Speech Evaluation in Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia.
    Yanagida S; Nishizawa N; Hashimoto R; Mizoguchi K; Hatakeyama H; Homma A; Fukuda S
    J Voice; 2018 Sep; 32(5):585-591. PubMed ID: 28802787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adaptation and Validation of the Voice-Related Quality of Life Measure Into Polish.
    Sielska-Badurek E; Rzepakowska A; Sobol M; Osuch-Wójcikiewicz E; Niemczyk K
    J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):773.e7-773.e12. PubMed ID: 26739855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.