These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29936510)

  • 41. Speech reception threshold benefits in cochlear implant users with an adaptive beamformer in real life situations.
    Geißler G; Arweiler I; Hehrmann P; Lenarz T; Hamacher V; Büchner A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Mar; 16(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 24993633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Binaural pre-processing for contralateral sound field attenuation can improve speech-in-noise intelligibility for bilateral hearing-aid users.
    San-Victoriano FM; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2023 May; 432():108743. PubMed ID: 37003080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The Benefits of Bimodal Aiding on Extended Dimensions of Speech Perception: Intelligibility, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality.
    Devocht EMJ; Janssen AML; Chalupper J; Stokroos RJ; George ELJ
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517727900. PubMed ID: 28874096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. More challenging speech-perception tasks demonstrate binaural benefit in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Wackym PA; Runge-Samuelson CL; Firszt JB; Alkaf FM; Burg LS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):80S-85S. PubMed ID: 17496654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Clinical selection criteria for a second cochlear implant for bimodal listeners.
    Yoon YS; Shin YR; Fu QJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Sep; 33(7):1161-8. PubMed ID: 22772002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
    Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. From hearing with a cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid (CI/HA) to hearing with two cochlear implants (CI/CI): a within-subject design comparison.
    Luntz M; Egra-Dagan D; Attias J; Yehudai N; Most T; Shpak T
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1682-90. PubMed ID: 25275862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Improved binaural speech reception thresholds through small symmetrical separation of speech and noise.
    Wagner L; Geiling L; Hauth C; Hocke T; Plontke S; Rahne T
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0236469. PubMed ID: 32756594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. ForwardFocus with cochlear implant recipients in spatially separated and fluctuating competing signals - introduction of a reference metric.
    Hey M; Hocke T; Böhnke B; Mauger SJ
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Dec; 58(12):869-878. PubMed ID: 31464542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
    Spriet A; Van Deun L; Eftaxiadis K; Laneau J; Moonen M; van Dijk B; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [A sound reproduction system using wave field synthesis to simulate everyday listening conditions].
    Weißgerber T
    HNO; 2019 Apr; 67(4):265-271. PubMed ID: 30859252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Contralateral hearing aid use in cochlear implanted patients: multicenter study of bimodal benefit.
    Morera C; Cavalle L; Manrique M; Huarte A; Angel R; Osorio A; Garcia-Ibañez L; Estrada E; Morera-Ballester C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1084-94. PubMed ID: 22667256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise.
    Gifford RH; Revit LJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(7):441-51; quiz 487-8. PubMed ID: 20807480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Localization and interaural time difference (ITD) thresholds for cochlear implant recipients with preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear.
    Gifford RH; Grantham DW; Sheffield SW; Davis TJ; Dwyer R; Dorman MF
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():28-37. PubMed ID: 24607490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Vibro-Tactile Enhancement of Speech Intelligibility in Multi-talker Noise for Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.
    Fletcher MD; Mills SR; Goehring T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518797838. PubMed ID: 30222089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users - microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments.
    Büchner A; Schwebs M; Lenarz T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31590612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Beamforming and Single-Microphone Noise Reduction: Effects on Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Speech Recognition of Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Stronks HC; Briaire J; Frijns J
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221112762. PubMed ID: 35862265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.