These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29937628)
1. Social interaction effects: The impact of distributional preferences on risky choices. Gantner A; Kerschbamer R J Risk Uncertain; 2018; 56(2):141-164. PubMed ID: 29937628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer Effects in Pro-Social Behavior: Social Norms or Social Preferences? Gächter S; Nosenzo D; Sefton M J Eur Econ Assoc; 2013 Jun; 11(3):548-573. PubMed ID: 28553193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Building representations of the social world: Children extract patterns from social choices to reason about multi-group hierarchies. Heck IA; Kushnir T; Kinzler KD Dev Sci; 2023 Jul; 26(4):e13366. PubMed ID: 36588167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Positive Arousal Increases Individuals' Preferences for Risk. Galentino A; Bonini N; Savadori L Front Psychol; 2017; 8():2142. PubMed ID: 29312030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of the certainty context on the process of choice. Dickhaut J; McCabe K; Nagode JC; Rustichini A; Smith K; Pardo JV Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Mar; 100(6):3536-41. PubMed ID: 12626760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Promoting Competition or Helping the Less Endowed? Distributional Preferences and Collective Institutional Choices under Intragroup Inequality. Kamei K J Conflict Resolut; 2018 Mar; 62(3):626-655. PubMed ID: 30886442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Higher-order risk preferences in social settings. Heinrich T; Mayrhofer T Exp Econ; 2018; 21(2):434-456. PubMed ID: 29720890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of perceived similarity on tacit coordination: propensity for matching and aversion to decoupling choices. Chierchia G; Coricelli G Front Behav Neurosci; 2015; 9():202. PubMed ID: 26283940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. If you don't want it, neither do I: Social influences on children's choices. Hennefield L; Markson L J Exp Child Psychol; 2016 Jan; 141():283-92. PubMed ID: 26229014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interdependent utilities: how social ranking affects choice behavior. Bault N; Coricelli G; Rustichini A PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3477. PubMed ID: 18941538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Behavioral contagion during learning about another agent's risk-preferences acts on the neural representation of decision-risk. Suzuki S; Jensen EL; Bossaerts P; O'Doherty JP Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Apr; 113(14):3755-60. PubMed ID: 27001826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is Utilitarianism Risky? How the Same Antecedents and Mechanism Produce Both Utilitarian and Risky Choices. Lucas BJ; Galinsky AD Perspect Psychol Sci; 2015 Jul; 10(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 26177954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Framing effects in choices between multioutcome life-expectancy lotteries. Bernstein LM; Chapman GB; Elstein AS Med Decis Making; 1999; 19(3):324-38. PubMed ID: 10424839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomization and social affairs: the 1970 draft lottery. Fienberg SE Science; 1971 Jan; 171(3968):255-61. PubMed ID: 17736218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A few bad apples: a model of disease influenced agent behaviour in a heterogeneous contact environment. Enright J; Kao RR PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118127. PubMed ID: 25734661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What Differences Make a Difference? The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations. Mannix E; Neale MA Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2005 Oct; 6(2):31-55. PubMed ID: 26158478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Learning the Structure of Social Influence. Gershman SJ; Pouncy HT; Gweon H Cogn Sci; 2017 Apr; 41 Suppl 3():545-575. PubMed ID: 28294384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]