These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29938599)

  • 1. Representational Bias in the Radial Axis in Children With Dyslexia: A Landmarks Alignment Study.
    Michel C; Quercia P; Joubert L
    J Learn Disabil; 2019; 52(2):158-167. PubMed ID: 29938599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Space representation in children with dyslexia and children without dyslexia: contribution of line bisection and circle centering tasks.
    Vieira S; Quercia P; Bonnetblanc F; Michel C
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Nov; 34(11):3997-4008. PubMed ID: 24036389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Left minineglect or inverse pseudoneglect in children with dyslexia?
    Michel C; Bidot S; Bonnetblanc F; Quercia P
    Neuroreport; 2011 Jan; 22(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 21164370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial biases in peripersonal space in sighted and blind individuals revealed by a haptic line bisection paradigm.
    Cattaneo Z; Fantino M; Tinti C; Pascual-Leone A; Silvanto J; Vecchi T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1110-21. PubMed ID: 21517214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differential Representation of Landmark and Self-Motion Information along the CA1 Radial Axis: Self-Motion Generated Place Fields Shift toward Landmarks during Septal Inactivation.
    Fattahi M; Sharif F; Geiller T; Royer S
    J Neurosci; 2018 Jul; 38(30):6766-6778. PubMed ID: 29954846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gradients of detection in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    Butler BC; Eskes GA; Vandorpe RA
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(3):346-58. PubMed ID: 14670573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adults with dyslexia can use cues to orient and constrain attention but have a smaller and weaker attention spotlight.
    Moores E; Tsouknida E; Romani C
    Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):55-65. PubMed ID: 25872179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Length perception and production of normal subjects in proximal versus distal peripersonal space.
    Kwon JC; Lee BH; Ji JM; Jeong Y; Kim BJ; Heilman KM; Na DL
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2004 Oct; 10(6):913-9. PubMed ID: 15637784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Left-ear-driven representational pseudoneglect for mentally represented real-word scenes created from aural-verbal description.
    Brooks JL; Brandimonte MA
    Cogn Process; 2014 May; 15(2):201-7. PubMed ID: 24317838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anisometry of space representation in neglect dyslexia.
    Savazzi S; Frigo C; Minuto D
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 May; 19(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 15062859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adults with dyslexia demonstrate space-based and object-based covert attention deficits: shifting attention to the periphery and shifting attention between objects in the left visual field.
    Buchholz J; Aimola Davies A
    Brain Cogn; 2005 Feb; 57(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 15629211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional representation of 3D space in endogenous attention shifts.
    Couyoumdjian A; Di Nocera F; Ferlazzo F
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Jan; 56(1):155-83. PubMed ID: 12587900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Horizontal and vertical pseudoneglect in peri- and extrapersonal space.
    Heber IA; Siebertz S; Wolter M; Kuhlen T; Fimm B
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 20537456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neglect dyslexia: a matter of "good looking".
    Primativo S; Arduino LS; De Luca M; Daini R; Martelli M
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Sep; 51(11):2109-19. PubMed ID: 23850599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Right hemisphere control of visuospatial attention in near space.
    Longo MR; Trippier S; Vagnoni E; Lourenco SF
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():350-7. PubMed ID: 25446963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reduced Pseudoneglect for Physical Space, but not Mental Representations of Space, for Adults with Autistic Traits.
    English MCW; Maybery MT; Visser TAW
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2017 Jul; 47(7):1956-1965. PubMed ID: 28374209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Haptic spatial matching in near peripersonal space.
    Kaas AL; Mier HI
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 170(3):403-13. PubMed ID: 16328265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The gradient of visual attention in developmental dyslexia.
    Facoetti A; Molteni M
    Neuropsychologia; 2001; 39(4):352-7. PubMed ID: 11164873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual-spatial attention in developmental dyslexia.
    Facoetti A; Paganoni P; Turatto M; Marzola V; Mascetti GG
    Cortex; 2000 Feb; 36(1):109-23. PubMed ID: 10728901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Developmental neglect dyslexia in a Hebrew-reading child.
    Friedmann N; Nachman-Katz I
    Cortex; 2004 Apr; 40(2):301-13. PubMed ID: 15156788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.