These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
311 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29938603)
1. Robotic Camera Assistance: The Future of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery? Ali JM; Lam K; Coonar AS Surg Innov; 2018 Oct; 25(5):485-491. PubMed ID: 29938603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benefits of Robotic Camera Assistance in Minimally Invasive Bariatric Procedures: Prospective Clinical Trial Using a Joystick-Guided Camera-Holder. Holländer SW; Klingen HJ; Hess S; Merscher A; Glanemann M; Birk D Surg Technol Int; 2019 May; 34():87-92. PubMed ID: 30888669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ergonomics in handheld and robot-assisted camera control: a randomized controlled trial. Wijsman PJM; Molenaar L; Van't Hullenaar CDP; van Vugt BST; Bleeker WA; Draaisma WA; Broeders IAMJ Surg Endosc; 2019 Dec; 33(12):3919-3925. PubMed ID: 30746574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The da Vinci Xi Robotic Four-Arm Approach for Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Grimminger PP; Hadzijusufovic E; Ruurda JP; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Aug; 66(5):407-409. PubMed ID: 29625500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is the Use of a Robotic Camera Holder Economically Viable? A Cost Comparison of Surgical Assistant Versus the Use of a Robotic Camera Holder in Laparoscopic Liver Resections. Stott MC; Barrie J; Sebastien D; Hammill C; Subar DA Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2017 Oct; 27(5):375-378. PubMed ID: 28727633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a stand-alone robotic camera holding system: technology that improves laparoscopy. Rade M; Birkett D; Sherman J; Nepomnayshy D Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Mar; 31(3):404-409. PubMed ID: 32852261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rate of skill acquisition in the use of a robotic laparoscope holder (FreeHand(®)). Sbaih M; Arulampalam TH; Motson RW Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2016 Aug; 25(4):196-202. PubMed ID: 27270102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the image "right" for everyone? Introduction to the parallax effect in laparoscopic surgery. Cahais J; Schwarz L; Bridoux V; Huet E; Tuech JJ J Visc Surg; 2017 Feb; 154(1):11-14. PubMed ID: 27378511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of a robotic camera holder (FreeHand Mittal R; Sbaih M; Motson RW; Arulampalam T Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2020 Feb; 29(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 30789101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [MINIMALLY INVASIVE THORACIC SURGERY: PRESENT STATUS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES]. Kohno T Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Sep; 116(5):307-10. PubMed ID: 26630737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative effectiveness of human scope assistant versus robotic scope holder in laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Ohmura Y; Suzuki H; Kotani K; Teramoto A Surg Endosc; 2019 Jul; 33(7):2206-2216. PubMed ID: 30334160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Robotic Camera Holder Controlled by Head Movements: Exploring This New Robot-Surgeon Interface. Bucher JN; Bruewer K; Dietz LJ; Trebesius N; Hidding J; Wysocki M; Schoenberg MB; Werner J; Karcz K Surg Innov; 2020 Oct; 27(5):499-506. PubMed ID: 32406783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. First experience with THE AUTOLAP™ SYSTEM: an image-based robotic camera steering device. Wijsman PJM; Broeders IAMJ; Brenkman HJ; Szold A; Forgione A; Schreuder HWR; Consten ECJ; Draaisma WA; Verheijen PM; Ruurda JP; Kaufman Y Surg Endosc; 2018 May; 32(5):2560-2566. PubMed ID: 29101564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gaze gesture based human robot interaction for laparoscopic surgery. Fujii K; Gras G; Salerno A; Yang GZ Med Image Anal; 2018 Feb; 44():196-214. PubMed ID: 29277075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Task analysis of laparoscopic camera control schemes. Ellis RD; Munaco AJ; Reisner LA; Klein MD; Composto AM; Pandya AK; King BW Int J Med Robot; 2016 Dec; 12(4):576-584. PubMed ID: 26648563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pediatric robotic surgery: A single-institutional review of the first 100 consecutive cases. Meehan JJ; Sandler A Surg Endosc; 2008 Jan; 22(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 17522913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Concurrent use of a robotic uterine manipulator and a robotic laparoscope holder to achieve assistant-less solo laparoscopy: the double ViKY. Maheshwari M; Ind T J Robot Surg; 2015 Sep; 9(3):211-3. PubMed ID: 26531201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics. Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic Camera Assistance and Its Benefit in 1033 Traditional Laparoscopic Procedures: Prospective Clinical Trial Using a Joystick-guided Camera Holder. Holländer SW; Klingen HJ; Fritz M; Djalali P; Birk D Surg Technol Int; 2014 Nov; 25():19-23. PubMed ID: 25419950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]