These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29938682)

  • 21. A semi-automatic method to determine electrode positions and labels from gel artifacts in EEG/fMRI-studies.
    de Munck JC; van Houdt PJ; Verdaasdonk RM; Ossenblok PP
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(1):399-403. PubMed ID: 21784161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Complete electrode model in EEG: relationship and differences to the point electrode model.
    Pursiainen S; Lucka F; Wolters CH
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(4):999-1017. PubMed ID: 22297396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fused multivariate empirical mode decomposition (MEMD) and inverse solution method for EEG source localization.
    Khosropanah P; Ramli AR; Lim KS; Marhaban MH; Ahmedov A
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2018 Jul; 63(4):467-479. PubMed ID: 28734112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of head shape variations among individuals on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse problems.
    von Ellenrieder N; Muravchik CH; Wagner M; Nehorai A
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 56(3):587-97. PubMed ID: 19389682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A finite-element reciprocity solution for EEG forward modeling with realistic individual head models.
    Ziegler E; Chellappa SL; Gaggioni G; Ly JQM; Vandewalle G; André E; Geuzaine C; Phillips C
    Neuroimage; 2014 Dec; 103():542-551. PubMed ID: 25204867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysis of infant cortical synchrony is constrained by the number of recording electrodes and the recording montage.
    Tokariev A; Vanhatalo S; Palva JM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):310-323. PubMed ID: 26122070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. EEG deblurring techniques in a clinical context.
    Cincotti F; Babiloni C; Miniussi C; Carducci F; Moretti D; Salinari S; Pascual-Marqui R; Rossini PM; Babiloni F
    Methods Inf Med; 2004; 43(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 15026850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Sensitivity of Ear-EEG: Evaluating the Source-Sensor Relationship Using Forward Modeling.
    Meiser A; Tadel F; Debener S; Bleichner MG
    Brain Topogr; 2020 Nov; 33(6):665-676. PubMed ID: 32833181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Anatomical correlations of the international 10-20 sensor placement system in infants.
    Kabdebon C; Leroy F; Simmonet H; Perrot M; Dubois J; Dehaene-Lambertz G
    Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 99():342-56. PubMed ID: 24862070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cortical Source Analysis of Event-Related Potentials: A Developmental Approach.
    Conte S; Richards JE
    Dev Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Apr; 54():101092. PubMed ID: 35231872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The standardized EEG electrode array of the IFCN.
    Seeck M; Koessler L; Bast T; Leijten F; Michel C; Baumgartner C; He B; Beniczky S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2017 Oct; 128(10):2070-2077. PubMed ID: 28778476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Accuracy of EEG source reconstruction in the presence of brain lesions: modelling errors and surface electrodes' placement.
    Vatta F; Bruno P; Inchingolo P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2002; 38():423-8. PubMed ID: 12085644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The biophysical foundations of the localisation of encephalogram generators in the brain. The application of a distribution-type model to the localisation of epileptic foci].
    Grave-de Peralta R; González-Andino S; Gómez-González CM
    Rev Neurol; 2004 Oct 16-31; 39(8):748-56. PubMed ID: 15514904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Correspondence of electroencephalography and near-infrared spectroscopy sensitivities to the cerebral cortex using a high-density layout.
    Giacometti P; Diamond SG
    Neurophotonics; 2014 Oct; 1(2):025001. PubMed ID: 25558462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of tissue conductivity anisotropy on EEG/MEG field and return current computation in a realistic head model: a simulation and visualization study using high-resolution finite element modeling.
    Wolters CH; Anwander A; Tricoche X; Weinstein D; Koch MA; MacLeod RS
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):813-26. PubMed ID: 16364662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dangerous phase.
    Schiff SJ
    Neuroinformatics; 2005; 3(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 16284414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The spatial location of EEG electrodes: locating the best-fitting sphere relative to cortical anatomy.
    Towle VL; Bolaños J; Suarez D; Tan K; Grzeszczuk R; Levin DN; Cakmur R; Frank SA; Spire JP
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1993 Jan; 86(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 7678386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial localization of EEG electrodes.
    Koessler L; Maillard L; Benhadid A; Vignal JP; Braun M; Vespignani H
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2007; 37(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 17540292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dense array EEG: methodology and new hypothesis on epilepsy syndromes.
    Holmes MD
    Epilepsia; 2008; 49 Suppl 3():3-14. PubMed ID: 18304251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.