223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29939062)
1. Defendant stereotypicality moderates the effect of confession evidence on judgments of guilt.
Smalarz L; Madon S; Turosak A
Law Hum Behav; 2018 Aug; 42(4):355-368. PubMed ID: 29939062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Juror sensitivity to false confession risk factors: Dispositional vs. situational attributions for a confession.
Woestehoff SA; Meissner CA
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):564-79. PubMed ID: 27227274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.
Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Will jurors correct for evidence interdependence in their verdicts? It depends.
Pate M; Kienzle M; Vogler V
Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):78-89. PubMed ID: 30266044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence?
Henderson KS; Levett LM
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):638-649. PubMed ID: 27243361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.
Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mock jurors' perceptions and case decisions following a juvenile interrogation: Investigating the roles of interested adults and confession type.
Mindthoff A; Malloy LC; Höhs JM
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Jun; 44(3):209-222. PubMed ID: 32496092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "But He's a Star Football Player!": How Social Status Influences Mock Jurors' Perceptions in a Sexual Assault Case.
Pica E; Sheahan C; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2020 Oct; 35(19-20):3963-3985. PubMed ID: 29294785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mock-Jurors' Judgements in a Sexual Assault Case: The Influence of Defendant Race and Occupational Status, Delayed Reporting, and Multiple Allegations.
Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jul; 38(13-14):7964-7989. PubMed ID: 36762531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of motive information and crime unusualness on jurors' judgments in insanity cases.
Pickel KL
Law Hum Behav; 1998 Oct; 22(5):571-84. PubMed ID: 9833567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rape Perpetrators on Trial: The Effect of Sexual Assault-Related Schemas on Attributions of Blame.
Stuart SM; McKimmie BM; Masser BM
J Interpers Violence; 2019 Jan; 34(2):310-336. PubMed ID: 27026408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of proficiency testing information and error aversions on the weight given to fingerprint evidence.
Mitchell G; Garrett BL
Behav Sci Law; 2019 Mar; 37(2):195-210. PubMed ID: 30883891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How confession characteristics impact juror perceptions of evidence in criminal trials.
Shifton JJ
Behav Sci Law; 2019 Jan; 37(1):90-108. PubMed ID: 30706960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of a defendant's body weight on perceptions of guilt.
Schvey NA; Puhl RM; Levandoski KA; Brownell KD
Int J Obes (Lond); 2013 Sep; 37(9):1275-81. PubMed ID: 23295503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Talking about a black man: the influence of defendant and character witness race on jurors' use of character evidence.
Maeder EM; Hunt JS
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 21796674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modelling the effects of crime type and evidence on judgments about guilt.
Pearson JM; Law JR; Skene JAG; Beskind DH; Vidmar N; Ball DA; Malekpour A; Carter RM; Skene JHP
Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Nov; 2(11):856-866. PubMed ID: 30931399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Abuse Is Abuse: The Influence of Type of Abuse, Victim Age, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making.
Sheahan CL; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):938-956. PubMed ID: 29294918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
