229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29939062)
21. Abuse Is Abuse: The Influence of Type of Abuse, Victim Age, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making.
Sheahan CL; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):938-956. PubMed ID: 29294918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence.
Najdowski CJ; Bottoms BL; Vargas MC
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):401-30. PubMed ID: 19391102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors' judgments of offenders.
Jehle A; Miller MK; Kemmelmeier M
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Oct; 33(5):393-404. PubMed ID: 19082696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mock jurors' evaluation of firearm examiner testimony.
Garrett BL; Scurich N; Crozier WE
Law Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 44(5):412-423. PubMed ID: 33090867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of expert testimony and interrogation tactics on perceptions of confessions.
Moffa MS; Platania J
Psychol Rep; 2007 Apr; 100(2):563-70. PubMed ID: 17564233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Waiving goodbye to youth: Jurors perceive transferred juveniles differently from adults but render similar verdicts.
Katzman J; Fessinger MB; Bornstein BH; McWilliams K
Behav Sci Law; 2022 Nov; 40(6):835-858. PubMed ID: 36226574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors' verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence.
Woody WD; Forrest KD
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(3):333-60. PubMed ID: 19405020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mosaic or Melting Pot? Race and Juror Decision Making in Canada and the United States.
Maeder EM; McManus LA
J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jan; 37(1-2):NP991-NP1012. PubMed ID: 32401133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The interdependence of perceived confession voluntariness and case evidence.
Greenspan R; Scurich N
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):650-659. PubMed ID: 27149289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Jurors use mental state information to assess breach in negligence cases.
Margoni F; Brown TR
Cognition; 2023 Jul; 236():105442. PubMed ID: 36996604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Do laypeople recognize youth as a risk factor for false confession? A test of the 'common sense' hypothesis.
Grove LJ; Kukucka J
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(2):185-205. PubMed ID: 34712091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of criminal defendant's history of childhood sexual abuse and personality disorder diagnosis on juror decision making.
Butler E; Jacquin K
Personal Ment Health; 2014 Aug; 8(3):188-98. PubMed ID: 24753498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. "I Did It, But Not Like That": Effects of Factually Incorrect Confessions on Juror Judgments.
Jones EE; Bandy AD; Palmer PG
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2019; 26(4):553-570. PubMed ID: 31984096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Eyewitness confidence and mock juror decisions of guilt: A meta-analytic review.
Slane CR; Dodson CS
Law Hum Behav; 2022 Feb; 46(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 35073115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The perfect match: Do criminal stereotypes bias forensic evidence analysis?
Smalarz L; Madon S; Yang Y; Guyll M; Buck S
Law Hum Behav; 2016 Aug; 40(4):420-9. PubMed ID: 27149288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Harmless error analysis: How do judges respond to confession errors?
Wallace DB; Kassin SM
Law Hum Behav; 2012 Apr; 36(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 22471419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. False confessions, expert testimony, and admissibility.
Watson C; Weiss KJ; Pouncey C
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(2):174-86. PubMed ID: 20542936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Juror Decision-Making in a Child Trafficking Case: The Impact of Defendant and Victim Gender, Defendant Age, and Defendant Status.
Pica E; Hildenbrand A; Fraser L; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Sep; 38(17-18):10031-10054. PubMed ID: 37096978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Interactive Effects of Race and Expert Testimony on Jurors' Perceptions of Recanted Confessions.
Ewanation L; Maeder EM
Front Psychol; 2021; 12():699077. PubMed ID: 34539496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
