BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29939062)

  • 41. The effect of hypnotically elicited testimony on jurors' judgments of guilt and innocence.
    Wagstaff GF; Vella M; Perfect T
    J Soc Psychol; 1992 Oct; 132(5):591-5. PubMed ID: 1453692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments.
    Devenport JL; Cutler BL
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 15638210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Expert testimony influences juror decisions in criminal trials involving recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse.
    Khurshid A; Jacquin KM
    J Child Sex Abus; 2013; 22(8):949-67. PubMed ID: 24283545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.
    Warling D; Peterson-Badali M
    Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 12579618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Secondary confessions: the influence (or lack thereof) of incentive size and scientific expert testimony on jurors' perceptions of informant testimony.
    Maeder EM; Pica E
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Dec; 38(6):560-8. PubMed ID: 25180762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Attorney Questions Predict Jury-eligible Adult Assessments of Attorneys, Child Witnesses, and Defendant Guilt.
    Mugno AP; Klemfuss JZ; Lyon TD
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Jan; 34(1):178-99. PubMed ID: 26932420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Mock Juror Perceptions of Credibility and Culpability in an Autistic Defendant.
    Maras K; Marshall I; Sands C
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2019 Mar; 49(3):996-1010. PubMed ID: 30382444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An explanation for camera perspective bias in voluntariness judgment for video-recorded confession: Suggestion of cognitive frame.
    Park K; Pyo J
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):184-94. PubMed ID: 22667808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The credibility of recovered memory testimony: exploring the effects of alleged victim and perpetrator gender.
    Bornstein BH; Muller SL
    Child Abuse Negl; 2001 Nov; 25(11):1415-26. PubMed ID: 11766008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Suspect confession of child sexual abuse to investigators.
    Lippert T; Cross TP; Jones L; Walsh W
    Child Maltreat; 2010 May; 15(2):161-70. PubMed ID: 20410024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. PATHOLOGICAL STATES AND CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY.
    WILSON DL
    Can Med Assoc J; 1965 Sep; 93(10):541-5. PubMed ID: 14341653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. On the power of confession evidence: an experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis.
    Kassin SM; Neumann K
    Law Hum Behav; 1997 Oct; 21(5):469-84. PubMed ID: 9374602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: on the dangers of presuming guilt.
    Kassin SM; Goldstein CC; Savitsky K
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Apr; 27(2):187-203. PubMed ID: 12733421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. How jurors use and misuse character evidence.
    Hunt JS; Budesheim TL
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):347-61. PubMed ID: 15065980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Effect of Delayed Reporting on Mock-Juror Decision-Making in the Era of #MeToo.
    Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
    J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jul; 37(13-14):NP11791-NP11810. PubMed ID: 33636996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The mechanisms of minimization: How interrogation tactics suggest lenient sentencing through pragmatic implication.
    Luke TJ; Alceste F
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Aug; 44(4):266-285. PubMed ID: 32584064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The confession.
    Starr D
    Science; 2019 Jun; 364(6445):1022-1026. PubMed ID: 31196996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Police tactics and guilt status uniquely influence suspects' physiologic reactivity and resistance to confess.
    Normile CJ; Scherr KC
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Dec; 42(6):497-506. PubMed ID: 30284849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The perceived guilt and innocence of adults with developmental language disorder and adults with typical language during a mock interrogation.
    Spaulding TJ; Blewitt A
    J Commun Disord; 2024; 110():106429. PubMed ID: 38754317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.