These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29939066)

  • 1. Interviewing witnesses: Eliciting coarse-grain information.
    Brewer N; Vagadia AN; Hope L; Gabbert F
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Oct; 42(5):458-471. PubMed ID: 29939066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the effectiveness of the NICHD investigative interview protocol when interviewing French-speaking alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Quebec.
    Cyr M; Lamb ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2009 May; 33(5):257-68. PubMed ID: 19481261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A field evaluation of the Eye-Closure Interview with witnesses of serious crimes.
    Vredeveldt A; Tredoux CG; Nortje A; Kempen K; Puljević C; Labuschagne GN
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Apr; 39(2):189-97. PubMed ID: 25384065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tele-forensic interviewing can be a reasonable alternative to face-to-face interviewing of child witnesses.
    Dickinson JJ; Lytle NE; Poole DA
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):97-111. PubMed ID: 34110872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Witness memory and alcohol: The effects of state-dependent recall.
    Schreiber Compo N; Carol RN; Evans JR; Pimentel P; Holness H; Nichols-Lopez K; Rose S; Furton KG
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Apr; 41(2):202-215. PubMed ID: 27786509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How can we help witnesses to remember more? It's an (eyes) open and shut case.
    Perfect TJ; Wagstaff GF; Moore D; Andrews B; Cleveland V; Newcombe S; Brisbane KA; Brown L
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Aug; 32(4):314-24. PubMed ID: 17899340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metacognitive Monitoring and Control of Eyewitness Memory Reports in Autism.
    Maras K; Norris JE; Brewer N
    Autism Res; 2020 Nov; 13(11):2017-2029. PubMed ID: 32052919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A national survey of child forensic interviewers: Implications for research, practice, and law.
    Fessinger MB; McAuliff BD
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Apr; 44(2):113-127. PubMed ID: 32175750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does experiencing inattentional blindness for crime influence eyewitness recall?
    Cullen HJ; Paterson HM; van Golde C
    Memory; 2022 Feb; 30(2):206-216. PubMed ID: 34783643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Witnesses stumbling down memory lane: The effects of alcohol intoxication, retention interval, and repeated interviewing.
    Hagsand AV; Roos Af Hjelmsäter E; Granhag PA; Fahlke C; Söderpalm Gordh A
    Memory; 2017 Apr; 25(4):531-543. PubMed ID: 27249626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The cognitive interview for eyewitnesses with autism spectrum disorder.
    Maras KL; Bowler DM
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2010 Nov; 40(11):1350-60. PubMed ID: 20300816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of interview techniques on children's eyewitness reports and subsequent memories of a viewed event].
    Naka M
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2012 Oct; 83(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 23214079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are two interviews better than one? eyewitness memory across repeated cognitive interviews.
    Odinot G; Memon A; La Rooy D; Millen A
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e76305. PubMed ID: 24098471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mental time travel ability and the Mental Reinstatement of Context for crime witnesses.
    Smith-Spark JH; Bartimus J; Wilcock R
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Feb; 48():1-10. PubMed ID: 27788399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How common is "common knowledge" about child witnesses among legal professionals? Comparing interviewers, public defenders, and forensic psychologists with laypeople.
    Buck JA; Warren AR; Bruck M; Kuehnle K
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):867-83. PubMed ID: 25475918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. To wait or not to wait? Improving results when interviewing intoxicated witnesses to violence.
    Hildebrand Karlén M; Roos Af Hjelmsäter E; Fahlke C; Granhag PA; Söderpalm-Gordh A
    Scand J Psychol; 2017 Feb; 58(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 28054379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intoxicated eyewitnesses: Better than their reputation?
    Compo NS; Evans JR; Carol RN; Villalba D; Ham LS; Garcia T; Rose S
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Apr; 36(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 22471412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The cognitive interview buffers the effects of subsequent repeated questioning in the absence of negative feedback.
    Wysman L; Scoboria A; Gawrylowicz J; Memon A
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 24700351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An examination of the association between interviewer question type and story-grammar detail in child witness interviews about abuse.
    Feltis BB; Powell MB; Snow PC; Hughes-Scholes CH
    Child Abuse Negl; 2010 Jun; 34(6):407-13. PubMed ID: 20417968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Witnesses' memory for events and faces under elevated levels of intoxication.
    Altman CM; Schreiber Compo N; McQuiston D; Hagsand AV; Cervera J
    Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):946-959. PubMed ID: 29504452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.