These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29939066)

  • 21. Effects of interviewer familiarity and supportiveness on children's recall across repeated interviews.
    Brubacher SP; Poole DA; Dickinson JJ; La Rooy D; Szojka ZA; Powell MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Dec; 43(6):507-516. PubMed ID: 31448927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The dynamic interaction between eyewitnesses and interviewers: the impact of differences in perspective on memory reports and interviewer behavior.
    Douglass AB; Brewer N; Semmler C; Bustamante L; Hiley A
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Aug; 37(4):290-301. PubMed ID: 23646916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The grain-size lineup: A test of a novel eyewitness identification procedure.
    Horry R; Brewer N; Weber N
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Apr; 40(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 26595704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interviewing alleged victims with intellectual disabilities.
    Cederborg AC; Lamb M
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2008 Jan; 52(Pt 1):49-58. PubMed ID: 18173572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hypnotic interviewing: the best way to interview eyewitnesses?
    Kebbell MR; Wagstaff GF
    Behav Sci Law; 1998; 16(1):115-29. PubMed ID: 9549881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Eyewitness performance in cognitive and structured interviews.
    Memon A; Wark L; Holley A; Bull R; Koehnken G
    Memory; 1997 Sep; 5(5):639-56. PubMed ID: 9415325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is that what I said?: witnesses' responses to interviewer modifications.
    Hunt JS; Borgida E
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Dec; 25(6):583-603. PubMed ID: 11771636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Open-ended initial invitations are particularly helpful in eliciting forensically relevant information from child witnesses.
    Danby MC; Sharman SJ
    Child Abuse Negl; 2023 Dec; 146():106505. PubMed ID: 37844459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime.
    Wyman J; Foster I; Talwar V
    J Vis Exp; 2016 May; (111):. PubMed ID: 27168278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Enhancing individual and collaborative eyewitness memory with category clustering recall.
    Thorley C
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1128-1139. PubMed ID: 29376763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of divided attention at study and reporting procedure on regulation and monitoring for episodic recall.
    Sauer J; Hope L
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():143-56. PubMed ID: 27311110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Lineup administrators' expectations: their impact on eyewitness confidence.
    Garrioch L; Brimacombe CA
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Jun; 25(3):299-315. PubMed ID: 11480805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Truth is at hand: how gesture adds information during investigative interviews.
    Broaders SC; Goldin-Meadow S
    Psychol Sci; 2010 May; 21(5):623-8. PubMed ID: 20483837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Eyewitnesses' free-report verbal confidence statements are diagnostic of accuracy.
    Smalarz L; Yang Y; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):138-151. PubMed ID: 34110875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Encouraging and clarifying "don't know" responses enhances interview quality.
    Scoboria A; Fisico S
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Mar; 19(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 23544476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The use of the NICHD protocol to enhance the quantity of details obtained from children with low verbal abilities in investigative interviews: a pilot study.
    Dion J; Cyr M
    J Child Sex Abus; 2008; 17(2):144-62. PubMed ID: 19042243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The relationship between within-interview contradictions and eliciting interviewer utterances.
    Orbach Y; Lamb ME
    Child Abuse Negl; 2001 Mar; 25(3):323-33. PubMed ID: 11414392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can rapport building strategies, age, and question type influence preschoolers' disclosures of adult wrongdoing?
    Magnusson M; Ernberg E; Landström S; Joleby M; Akehurst L
    Scand J Psychol; 2020 Jun; 61(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 32052875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of intra- versus post-interview feedback during simulated practice interviews about child abuse.
    Powell MB; Fisher RP; Hughes-Scholes CH
    Child Abuse Negl; 2008 Feb; 32(2):213-27. PubMed ID: 18313750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. "Blind" interviewing: Is ignorance bliss?
    Rivard JR; Pena MM; Schreiber Compo N
    Memory; 2016 Oct; 24(9):1256-66. PubMed ID: 26488314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.