These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29939084)

  • 1. Quantitative evaluation of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient values on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict higher Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Kato S; Kamijima S; Inaoka T; Kamiya N; Sasai D; Terada H; Hiruta N; Suzuki H
    Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 29939084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Ratio Versus Conventional ADC for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer With 3-T MRI.
    Bajgiran AM; Mirak SA; Sung K; Sisk AE; Reiter RE; Raman SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Sep; 213(3):W134-W142. PubMed ID: 31216201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Apparent diffusion coefficient ratio correlates significantly with prostate cancer gleason score at final pathology.
    Boesen L; Chabanova E; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(2):446-53. PubMed ID: 25408104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiparametric MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Accuracy in Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Pepe P; D'Urso D; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M; Russo G; Sabini MG; Valastro LM; Galia A; Fraggetta F
    In Vivo; 2017; 31(3):415-418. PubMed ID: 28438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of observation size and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in PI-RADS v2.1 assessment category 4 and 5 observations compared to adverse pathological outcomes.
    Abreu-Gomez J; Walker D; Alotaibi T; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Schieda N
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Aug; 30(8):4251-4261. PubMed ID: 32211965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ADC Metrics From Multiparametric MRI: Histologic Downgrading of Gleason Score 9 or 10 Prostate Cancers Diagnosed at Nontargeted Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy.
    Sadoughi N; Krishna S; McInnes MDF; Flood TA; Breau RH; Morash C; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):W158-W165. PubMed ID: 29995495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Whole-Tumor Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram and Texture Analysis to Predict Gleason Score Upgrading in Intermediate-Risk 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Cancer.
    Rozenberg R; Thornhill RE; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Lim C; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):775-82. PubMed ID: 27003049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of extracapsular invasion and other staging parameters in patients with prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy.
    Lista F; Gimbernat H; Cáceres F; Rodríguez-Barbero JM; Castillo E; Angulo JC
    Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Jun; 38(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 24387827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Apparent diffusion coefficient values are superior to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy for the assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness.
    Li C; Chen M; Wang J; Wang X; Zhang W; Zhang C
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):232-239. PubMed ID: 27055916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and MR volumetry as independent associative factors for extra-prostatic extension (EPE) in prostatic carcinoma.
    Lim C; Flood TA; Hakim SW; Shabana WM; Quon JS; El-Khodary M; Thornhill RE; El Hallani S; Schieda N
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):726-36. PubMed ID: 26303719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
    Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preoperative Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Using ADC and ADC Ratio in Determining Gleason Score.
    Woo S; Kim SY; Cho JY; Kim SH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 27077643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Apparent diffusion coefficient value and ratio as noninvasive potential biomarkers to predict prostate cancer grading: comparison with prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen.
    De Cobelli F; Ravelli S; Esposito A; Giganti F; Gallina A; Montorsi F; Del Maschio A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Mar; 204(3):550-7. PubMed ID: 25714284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of Diffusion-weighted MR Images Based on a Gamma Distribution Model to Differentiate Prostate Cancers with Different Gleason Score.
    Tomita H; Soga S; Suyama Y; Ito K; Asano T; Shinmoto H
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2020 Feb; 19(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 30918223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of single-scanner single-protocol quantitative ADC measurements to ADC ratios to detect clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Wang X; Hielscher T; Radtke JP; Görtz M; Schütz V; Kuder TA; Gnirs R; Schwab C; Stenzinger A; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Bonekamp D
    Eur J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 136():109538. PubMed ID: 33482592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostate Cancer: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness-Comparison between Conventional and Kurtosis Models.
    Tamada T; Prabhu V; Li J; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
    Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):100-108. PubMed ID: 28394755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score--a computer-aided diagnosis development study.
    Peng Y; Jiang Y; Yang C; Brown JB; Antic T; Sethi I; Schmid-Tannwald C; Giger ML; Eggener SE; Oto A
    Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):787-96. PubMed ID: 23392430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of ADC ratio in discriminating true and false positives in multiparametric prostatic MRI.
    Falaschi Z; Valenti M; Lanzo G; Attanasio S; Valentini E; García Navarro LI; Aquilini F; Stecco A; Carriero A
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jul; 128():109024. PubMed ID: 32387923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer: Detection in a biopsy population.
    Ding K; Yao Y; Gao Y; Lu X; Chen H; Tang Q; Hua C; Zhou M; Zou X; Yin Q
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():138-146. PubMed ID: 31439233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.