These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29940697)

  • 1. Intra- and Inter-Element Variability in Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA from Fresh and Environmentally Exposed Skeletal Remains.
    Antinick TC; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 29940697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High efficiency DNA extraction from bone by total demineralization.
    Loreille OM; Diegoli TM; Irwin JA; Coble MD; Parsons TJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):191-5. PubMed ID: 19083754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inter and intra-individual variation in skeletal DNA preservation in buried remains.
    Emmons AL; Davoren J; DeBruyn JM; Mundorff AZ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102193. PubMed ID: 31710897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of bone demineralisation procedures for DNA recovery from burned remains.
    Mckinnon M; Higgins D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Mar; 51():102448. PubMed ID: 33373911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Large fragment demineralization: an alternative pretreatment for forensic DNA typing of bones.
    Corrêa H; Cortellini V; Franceschetti L; Verzeletti A
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 Jul; 135(4):1417-1424. PubMed ID: 33587178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intra-bone nuclear DNA variability in Second World War metatarsal and metacarpal bones.
    Inkret J; Podovšovnik E; Zupanc T; Haring G; Pajnič IZ
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 Jul; 135(4):1245-1256. PubMed ID: 33624158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Extraction of DNA from Skeletonized Postcranial Remains: A Discussion of Protocols and Testing Modalities.
    Edson SM
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1312-1323. PubMed ID: 30925208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The correlation between skeletal weathering and DNA quality and quantity.
    Misner LM; Halvorson AC; Dreier JL; Ubelaker DH; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Jul; 54(4):822-8. PubMed ID: 19368622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SD quants-Sensitive detection tetraplex-system for nuclear and mitochondrial DNA quantification and degradation inference.
    Xavier C; Eduardoff M; Strobl C; Parson W
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Sep; 42():39-44. PubMed ID: 31216503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation Of A Powder-Free DNA Extraction Method For Skeletal Remains.
    Harrel M; Mayes C; Gangitano D; Hughes-Stamm S
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 Nov; 63(6):1819-1823. PubMed ID: 29411392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatable full demineralization DNA extraction procedure from degraded skeletal remains.
    Amory S; Huel R; Bilić A; Loreille O; Parsons TJ
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):398-406. PubMed ID: 21885362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical note: Efficiency of total demineralization and ion-exchange column for DNA extraction from bone.
    Seo SB; Zhang A; Kim HY; Yi JA; Lee HY; Shin DH; Lee SD
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2010 Jan; 141(1):158-62. PubMed ID: 19845025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A simple Duplex-PCR to evaluate the DNA quality of anthropological and forensic samples prior short tandem repeat typing.
    von Wurmb-Schwark N; Schwark T; Harbeck M; Oehmichen M
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2004 Apr; 6(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 15039050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the Utility of Soil DNA Extraction Kits for Increasing DNA Yields and Eliminating PCR Inhibitors from Buried Skeletal Remains.
    Hebda LM; Foran DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Sep; 60(5):1322-30. PubMed ID: 26258388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Difficulties of sex determination from forensic bone degraded DNA: A comparison of three methods.
    Quincey D; Carle G; Alunni V; Quatrehomme G
    Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 23937932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extraction of DNA from Human Skeletal Material.
    Pajnič IZ
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1420():89-108. PubMed ID: 27259733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of nuclear DNA yield and STR typing success in Second World War petrous bones and metacarpals III.
    Zupanič Pajnič I; Inkret J; Zupanc T; Podovšovnik E
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Nov; 55():102578. PubMed ID: 34425360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Usefulness of microchip electrophoresis for the analysis of mitochondrial DNA in forensic and ancient DNA studies.
    Alonso A; Albarran C; Martín P; García P; Capilla J; García O; de la Rua C; Izaguirre N; Pereira F; Pereira L; Amorim A; Sancho M
    Electrophoresis; 2006 Dec; 27(24):5101-9. PubMed ID: 17120261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Extraction of DNA from Skeletal Remains.
    Edson SM; McMahon TP
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1420():69-87. PubMed ID: 27259732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DNA typing of bone specimens--the potential use of the profiler test as a tool for bone identification.
    Imaizumi K; Noguchi K; Shiraishi T; Sekiguchi K; Senju H; Fujii K; Yoshida K; Kasai K; Yoshino M
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2005 Jan; 7(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 15556013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.