BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29940824)

  • 1. Causal inference for long-term survival in randomised trials with treatment switching: Should re-censoring be applied when estimating counterfactual survival times?
    Latimer NR; White IR; Abrams KR; Siebert U
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2475-2493. PubMed ID: 29940824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved two-stage estimation to adjust for treatment switching in randomised trials: g-estimation to address time-dependent confounding.
    Latimer NR; White IR; Tilling K; Siebert U
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2900-2918. PubMed ID: 32223524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A cautionary tale: an evaluation of the performance of treatment switching adjustment methods in a real world case study.
    Latimer NR; Dewdney A; Campioni M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Jan; 24(1):17. PubMed ID: 38253996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The net benefit for time-to-event outcome in oncology clinical trials with treatment switching.
    Fukuda M; Sakamaki K; Oba K
    Clin Trials; 2023 Dec; 20(6):670-680. PubMed ID: 37455538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Composite event-free-survival as an endpoint in oncology drug evaluation: Review and guidance perspectives from the Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS).
    Lengliné E; Baba J; de Boissieu P; Beaufils A; Desbiolles A; Diatta T; Cochat P; Chevret S
    Eur J Cancer; 2024 Jun; 204():114047. PubMed ID: 38653034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Equal censoring but still informative: When the reasons for censoring differ between treatment arms.
    Olivier T; Prasad V
    Eur J Cancer; 2024 Apr; 201():113942. PubMed ID: 38382151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-inferiority trials with time-to-event data: clarifying the impact of censoring.
    Choi J; Xue X; Kim M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Mar; 34(2):222-239. PubMed ID: 37042702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Progression-free survival estimates are shaped by specific censoring rules: Implications for PFS as an endpoint in cancer randomized trials.
    Lesan V; Olivier T; Prasad V
    Eur J Cancer; 2024 May; 202():114022. PubMed ID: 38547775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomization inference with general interference and censoring.
    Loh WW; Hudgens MG; Clemens JD; Ali M; Emch ME
    Biometrics; 2020 Mar; 76(1):235-245. PubMed ID: 31388990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of baseline covariate adjustment methods for restricted mean survival time.
    Hanada K; Moriya J; Kojima M
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2024 Mar; 138():107440. PubMed ID: 38228232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Restricted Net Treatment Benefit in oncology.
    Piffoux M; Ozenne B; De Backer M; Buyse M; Chiem JC; Péron J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Apr; 170():111340. PubMed ID: 38570079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A nonparametric relative treatment effect for direct comparisons of censored paired survival outcomes.
    Dobler D; Möllenhoff K
    Stat Med; 2024 May; 43(11):2216-2238. PubMed ID: 38545940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A causal framework for classical statistical estimands in failure-time settings with competing events.
    Young JG; Stensrud MJ; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Hernán MA
    Stat Med; 2020 Apr; 39(8):1199-1236. PubMed ID: 31985089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mediation Analysis for Censored Survival Data Under an Accelerated Failure Time Model.
    Fulcher IR; Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ; Williams PL
    Epidemiology; 2017 Sep; 28(5):660-666. PubMed ID: 28574921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distorted correlations among censored data: causes, effects, and correction.
    Barchard KA; Russell JA
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1207-1228. PubMed ID: 38129736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved 30-Day Survival Estimation in ICU Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Different Approaches With Real-World Data.
    Vacheron CH; Friggeri A; Gerbaud-Coulas C; Dagonneau T; Timsit JF; Allaouchiche B; Wallet F; Bohe J; Piriou V; Maucort-Boulch D; Fauvernier M
    Crit Care Med; 2024 Mar; 52(3):432-440. PubMed ID: 37882642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perils of Randomized Controlled Trial Survival Extrapolation Assuming Treatment Effect Waning: Why the Distinction Between Marginal and Conditional Estimates Matters.
    Jennings AC; Rutherford MJ; Latimer NR; Sweeting MJ; Lambert PC
    Value Health; 2024 Mar; 27(3):347-355. PubMed ID: 38154594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constructing dynamic treatment regimes with shared parameters for censored data.
    Zhao YQ; Zhu R; Chen G; Zheng Y
    Stat Med; 2020 Apr; 39(9):1250-1263. PubMed ID: 31951041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deep learning for survival outcomes.
    Steingrimsson JA; Morrison S
    Stat Med; 2020 Jul; 39(17):2339-2349. PubMed ID: 32281672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of the Management and Proportion of Lost to Follow-Up Cases on Cancer Survival Estimates for Small Population-Based Cancer Registries.
    Gil F; Miranda-Filho A; Uribe-Perez C; Arias-Ortiz NE; Yépez-Chamorro MC; Bravo LM; de Vries E
    J Cancer Epidemiol; 2022; 2022():9068214. PubMed ID: 35140789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.