These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29941000)

  • 1. Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles.
    Goldstein CE; Weijer C; Brehaut JC; Campbell M; Fergusson DA; Grimshaw JM; Hemming K; Horn AR; Taljaard M
    Trials; 2018 Jun; 19(1):334. PubMed ID: 29941000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reconsidering 'ethics' and 'quality' in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm.
    Stevenson FA; Gibson W; Pelletier C; Chrysikou V; Park S
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 May; 16():21. PubMed ID: 25952678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical oversight in quality improvement and quality improvement research: new approaches to promote a learning health care system.
    Fiscella K; Tobin JN; Carroll JK; He H; Ogedegbe G
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16(1):63. PubMed ID: 26383770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol.
    Taljaard M; Weijer C; Grimshaw JM; Ali A; Brehaut JC; Campbell MK; Carroll K; Edwards S; Eldridge S; Forrest CB; Giraudeau B; Goldstein CE; Graham ID; Hemming K; Hey SP; Horn AR; Jairath V; Klassen TP; London AJ; Marlin S; Marshall JC; McIntyre L; McKenzie JE; Nicholls SG; Alison Paprica P; Zwarenstein M; Fergusson DA
    Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):525. PubMed ID: 30261933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The ethical oversight of learning health care activities in Switzerland: a qualitative study.
    McLennan S
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2019 Oct; 31(8):G81-G86. PubMed ID: 31066452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stepped-wedge trials should be classified as research for the purpose of ethical review.
    Hemming K; Taljaard M; Marshall T; Goldstein CE; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):580-588. PubMed ID: 31818147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond regulatory approaches to ethics: making space for ethical preparedness in healthcare research.
    Lyle K; Weller S; Samuel G; Lucassen AM
    J Med Ethics; 2023 May; 49(5):352-356. PubMed ID: 35725300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What does 'quality' add? Towards an ethics of healthcare improvement.
    Cribb A; Entwistle V; Mitchell P
    J Med Ethics; 2020 Feb; 46(2):118-122. PubMed ID: 31732680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The views of quality improvement professionals and comparative effectiveness researchers on ethics, IRBs, and oversight.
    Whicher D; Kass N; Saghai Y; Faden R; Tunis S; Pronovost P
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):132-44. PubMed ID: 25742674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oversight on the borderline: Quality improvement and pragmatic research.
    Finkelstein JA; Brickman AL; Capron A; Ford DE; Gombosev A; Greene SM; Iafrate RP; Kolaczkowski L; Pallin SC; Pletcher MJ; Staman KL; Vazquez MA; Sugarman J
    Clin Trials; 2015 Oct; 12(5):457-66. PubMed ID: 26374685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethics approval, guarantees of quality and the meddlesome editor.
    Long T; Fallon D
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1398-404. PubMed ID: 17655528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethical review of health service research in the UK: implications for nursing.
    Tod AM; Nicolson P; Allmark P
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 Nov; 40(4):379-86. PubMed ID: 12421396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to distinguish research from quality improvement.
    Cooper JA; McNair L
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Apr; 10(2):209-10. PubMed ID: 25819760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethics of health policy and systems research: a scoping review of the literature.
    Pratt B; Paul A; Hyder AA; Ali J
    Health Policy Plan; 2017 Jul; 32(6):890-910. PubMed ID: 28335031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Ethics? But it's only quality improvement!".
    Flaming D; Barrett-Smith L; Brown N; Corcoran J
    Healthc Q; 2009; 12(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19369811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thinking clearly about the FIRST trial: addressing ethical challenges in cluster randomised trials of policy interventions involving health providers.
    Horn AR; Weijer C; Hey SP; Brehaut J; Fergusson DA; Goldstein CE; Grimshaw J; Taljaard M
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Sep; 44(9):593-598. PubMed ID: 29703860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research.
    Cassell J; Young A
    J Med Ethics; 2002 Oct; 28(5):313-7. PubMed ID: 12356960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
    Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality, safety, and institutional review boards: navigating ethics and oversight in applied health systems research.
    Kass NE; Pronovost PJ
    Am J Med Qual; 2011; 26(2):157-9. PubMed ID: 21403179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethical Issues in Patient Safety Research: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Whicher DM; Kass NE; Audera-Lopez C; Butt M; Jauregui IL; Harris K; Knoche J; Saxena A
    J Patient Saf; 2015 Sep; 11(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 24618642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.