These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29941159)

  • 21. Active Dynamic Thermography is a Sensitive Method for Distinguishing Burn Wound Conversion.
    Prindeze NJ; Hoffman HA; Ardanuy JG; Zhang J; Carney BC; Moffatt LT; Shupp JW
    J Burn Care Res; 2016; 37(6):e559-e568. PubMed ID: 26284633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Friction burns in children: does laser Doppler imaging have a role?
    Menon S; Ward D; Harvey JG; Hei EL; Holland AJ
    J Burn Care Res; 2012; 33(6):736-40. PubMed ID: 22878493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The measurement properties of assessment tools for chronic wounds: A systematic review.
    Smet S; Probst S; Holloway S; Fourie A; Beele H; Beeckman D
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2021 Sep; 121():103998. PubMed ID: 34237439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI) and clinical assessment in differentiating between superficial and deep partial thickness burn wounds.
    Jan SN; Khan FA; Bashir MM; Nasir M; Ansari HH; Shami HB; Nazir U; Hanif A; Sohail M
    Burns; 2018 Mar; 44(2):405-413. PubMed ID: 28918904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relationship between healing time and mean perfusion units of laser Doppler imaging (LDI) in pediatric burns.
    Cho JK; Moon DJ; Kim SG; Lee HG; Chung SP; Yoon CJ
    Burns; 2009 Sep; 35(6):818-23. PubMed ID: 19423231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnostic Accuracy of Laser Doppler Imaging for the Assessment of Burn Depth: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.
    Wang R; Zhao J; Zhang Z; Cao C; Zhang Y; Mao Y
    J Burn Care Res; 2020 May; 41(3):619-625. PubMed ID: 31872859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validity of laser speckle contrast imaging for the prediction of burn wound healing potential.
    Zheng KJ; Middelkoop E; Stoop M; van Zuijlen PPM; Pijpe A
    Burns; 2022 Mar; 48(2):319-327. PubMed ID: 34006410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A prospective study comparing the FLIR ONE with laser Doppler imaging in the assessment of burn depth by a tertiary burns unit in the United Kingdom.
    Goel J; Nizamoglu M; Tan A; Gerrish H; Cranmer K; El-Muttardi N; Barnes D; Dziewulski P
    Scars Burn Heal; 2020; 6():2059513120974261. PubMed ID: 33489315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Burn wound depth assessment--is laser Doppler imaging the best measurement tool available?
    Mandal A
    Int Wound J; 2006 Jun; 3(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 17007344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of infrared thermography evaluation in burn wound healing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Pedrosa R; Souza Martins L; Freire RM; do Nascimento Silva RK; Ferreira JJA; do Nascimento JA; Rodrigues de Andrade P
    J Wound Care; 2024 Apr; 33(Sup4a):cxviii-cxxix. PubMed ID: 38588060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Modalities for the assessment of burn wound depth.
    Devgan L; Bhat S; Aylward S; Spence RJ
    J Burns Wounds; 2006 Feb; 5():e2. PubMed ID: 16921415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A new, fast LDI for assessment of burns: a multi-centre clinical evaluation.
    Hoeksema H; Baker RD; Holland AJ; Perry T; Jeffery SL; Verbelen J; Monstrey S
    Burns; 2014 Nov; 40(7):1274-82. PubMed ID: 24996246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laser doppler line scan burn imager (LDLS-BI): sideways move or a step ahead?
    Holland AJ; Ward D; La Hei ER; Harvey JG
    Burns; 2014 Feb; 40(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 23773790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Noninvasive Techniques for the Determination of Burn Severity in Real Time.
    Burmeister DM; Cerna C; Becerra SC; Sloan M; Wilmink G; Christy RJ
    J Burn Care Res; 2017; 38(1):e180-e191. PubMed ID: 27355653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Long-term scar quality in burns with three distinct healing potentials: A multicenter prospective cohort study.
    Goei H; van der Vlies CH; Hop MJ; Tuinebreijer WE; Nieuwenhuis MK; Middelkoop E; van Baar ME
    Wound Repair Regen; 2016 Jul; 24(4):721-30. PubMed ID: 27102976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Determining burn depth: clinical assessment and laser Doppler imaging].
    Hop MJ; van Baar ME; Nieuwenhuis MK; Dokter J; Middelkoop E; van der Vlies CH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2012; 156(31):A4810. PubMed ID: 22853769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
    Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparative evaluation of spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis and laser doppler imaging in the assessment of adult and paediatric burn injuries.
    Charuvila S; Singh M; Collins D; Jones I
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Jul; 71(7):1015-1022. PubMed ID: 29776847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using ordinal logistic regression to evaluate the performance of laser-Doppler predictions of burn-healing time.
    Baker RD; Weinand C; Jeng JC; Hoeksema H; Monstrey S; Pape SA; Spence R; Wilson D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Feb; 9():11. PubMed ID: 19220885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Utility of spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) and laser speckle imaging (LSI) to non-invasively diagnose burn depth in a porcine model.
    Burmeister DM; Ponticorvo A; Yang B; Becerra SC; Choi B; Durkin AJ; Christy RJ
    Burns; 2015 Sep; 41(6):1242-52. PubMed ID: 26138371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.