These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2994120)

  • 1. The conditioned place preference is affected by two independent reinforcement processes.
    White NM; Carr GD
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1985 Jul; 23(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2994120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contingent and non-contingent actions of sucrose and saccharin reinforcers: effects on taste preference and memory.
    Messier C; White NM
    Physiol Behav; 1984 Feb; 32(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 6718546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Role of gustatory and postingestive actions of sweeteners in the generation of positive affect as evaluated by place preference conditioning.
    Agmo A; Marroquin E
    Appetite; 1997 Dec; 29(3):269-89. PubMed ID: 9468761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reward and reinforcement produced by drinking sucrose: two processes that may depend on different neurotransmitters.
    Agmo A; Galvan A; Talamantes B
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1995 Oct; 52(2):403-14. PubMed ID: 8577808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Taste-potentiated odor aversion learning based on amphetamine.
    Bryant PA; Boakes RA; McGregor IS
    Physiol Behav; 1993 Aug; 54(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 8396783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Chlordiazepoxide enhances the palatability of lithium-, amphetamine-, and saline-paired saccharin solution.
    Parker LA
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1995 Mar; 50(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 7617672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Disparity between formation of conditioned flavor aversions and neophobia during grooming in rats and mice.
    Stewart CN; Reidinger RF
    Physiol Behav; 1984 Jun; 32(6):955-9. PubMed ID: 6093167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responding for conditioned reinforcement in C57BL/6 and CD-1 mice, and Sprague-Dawley rats: Effects of methylphenidate and amphetamine.
    Browne JD; Soko AD; Fletcher PJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2014 Dec; 231(23):4503-16. PubMed ID: 24804572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Drug reinforcement studied by the use of place conditioning in rat.
    Mucha RF; van der Kooy D; O'Shaughnessy M; Bucenieks P
    Brain Res; 1982 Jul; 243(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 6288174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Saccharin's rewarding, conditioned reinforcing, and memory-improving properties: mediation by isomorphic or independent processes?
    Stefurak TL; van der Kooy D
    Behav Neurosci; 1992 Feb; 106(1):125-39. PubMed ID: 1554427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of trimethyltin chloride on the acquisition of long delay conditioned taste aversion learning in the rat.
    Riley AL; Dacanay RJ; Mastropaolo JP
    Neurotoxicology; 1984; 5(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 6095144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aversion to the reinforcer differentially affects conditioned reinforcement and instrumental responding.
    Wilson CL; Sherman JE; Holman EW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Apr; 7(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 7241052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lateral parabrachial lesions impair lithium chloride-induced aversive responses but not saccharin-induced flavor preference.
    Navarro M; Cubero I
    Brain Res; 2003 Nov; 990(1-2):195-202. PubMed ID: 14568344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhancement of conditioned preference for a place paired with amphetamine produced by blocking the association between place and amphetamine-induced sickness.
    Lett BT
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1988; 95(3):390-4. PubMed ID: 3137627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re-examination of amphetamine-induced conditioned suppression of tastant intake in rats: the task-dependent drug effects hypothesis.
    Huang AC; Hsiao S
    Behav Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 122(6):1207-16. PubMed ID: 19045940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Operant responding for conditioned and unconditioned reinforcers in rats is differentially enhanced by the primary reinforcing and reinforcement-enhancing effects of nicotine.
    Chaudhri N; Caggiula AR; Donny EC; Booth S; Gharib M; Craven L; Palmatier MI; Liu X; Sved AF
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2006 Nov; 189(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 17019569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Drug-drug heart rate conditioning in rats: effective USs when pentobarbital is the CS.
    Reilly S; Revusky S
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1992 Aug; 42(4):633-43. PubMed ID: 1325056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pre-exposure to flavor and conditioned taste aversion: amphetamine and lithium reinforcers.
    Wellman PJ
    Psychol Rep; 1982 Apr; 50(2):555-8. PubMed ID: 6283577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Conditioned enhancement of natural killer cell activity, but not interferon, with camphor or saccharin-LiCl conditioned stimulus.
    Ghanta VK; Hiramoto NS; Solvason HB; Tyring SK; Spector NH; Hiramoto RN
    J Neurosci Res; 1987; 18(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 2824798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reinforcer revaluation and conditioned place preference.
    Perks SM; Clifton PG
    Physiol Behav; 1997 Jan; 61(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8976526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.