BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29941227)

  • 1. The 8th edition American Joint Committee on gastric cancer pathological staging classification performs well in a population with high proportion of locally advanced disease.
    Huang SF; Chien TH; Fang WL; Wang F; Tsai CY; Hsu JT; Yeh CN; Chen TC; Wu RC; Chiu CT; Yeh TS
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1634-1639. PubMed ID: 29941227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the 8th Edition of the AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer using the National Cancer Database.
    In H; Solsky I; Palis B; Langdon-Embry M; Ajani J; Sano T
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 24(12):3683-3691. PubMed ID: 28895113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The IGCA staging system is more accurate than AJCC7 system in stratifying survival of patients with gastric cancer in stage III.
    Shu P; Qin J; Shen K; Chen W; Liu F; Fang Y; Wang X; Wang H; Shen Z; Sun Y; Qin X
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Mar; 17(1):238. PubMed ID: 28359303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. External validation of a modified 8th AJCC TNM system for advanced gastric cancer: Long-term results in southern China.
    Ye J; Ren Y; Wei Z; Hou X; Dai W; Cai S; Tan M; He Y; Yuan Y
    Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 27(2):146-153. PubMed ID: 29937164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition classification on staging and survival of patients with melanoma.
    Kanaki T; Stang A; Gutzmer R; Zimmer L; Chorti E; Sucker A; Ugurel S; Hadaschik E; Gräger NS; Satzger I; Schadendorf D; Livingstone E
    Eur J Cancer; 2019 Sep; 119():18-29. PubMed ID: 31401470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. N3 subclassification incorporated into the final pathologic staging of gastric cancer: a modified system based on current AJCC staging.
    Yeh CN; Wang SY; Hsu JT; Chiang KC; Cheng CT; Tsai CY; Liu YY; Liao CH; Liu KH; Yeh TS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Feb; 94(8):e575. PubMed ID: 25715257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Proposal and validation of a modified staging system to improve the prognosis predictive performance of the 8th AJCC/UICC pTNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study with external validation.
    Fang C; Wang W; Deng JY; Sun Z; Seeruttun SR; Wang ZN; Xu HM; Liang H; Zhou ZW
    Cancer Commun (Lond); 2018 Nov; 38(1):67. PubMed ID: 30454049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: International Gastric Cancer Association staging project.
    Sano T; Coit DG; Kim HH; Roviello F; Kassab P; Wittekind C; Yamamoto Y; Ohashi Y
    Gastric Cancer; 2017 Mar; 20(2):217-225. PubMed ID: 26897166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio: the lymph node ratio could be a prognostic indicator for patients with gastric cancer.
    Hou Y; Wang X; Chen J
    World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 16(1):198. PubMed ID: 30286762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A homogenized approach to classify advanced gastric cancer patients with limited and adequate number of pathologically examined lymph nodes.
    Seeruttun SR; Xu L; Wang F; Yi X; Fang C; Liu Z; Wang W; Zhou Z
    Cancer Commun (Lond); 2019 Jun; 39(1):32. PubMed ID: 31182160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel lymph node staging system for gastric cancer including modified Union for cancer Control/American Joint Committee on cancer and Japanese Gastric Cancer Association criteria.
    Gong Y; Pan S; Wang X; Zhu G; Xu H; Zhu Z
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 46(10 Pt B):e27-e32. PubMed ID: 32631708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer.
    Kikuchi S; Futawatari N; Sakuramoto S; Katada N; Yamashita K; Shibata T; Nemoto M; Watanabe M
    Anticancer Res; 2011 Jun; 31(6):2361-5. PubMed ID: 21737665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The prognostic value of different node staging systems in patients with ≤15 lymph nodes following surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma.
    Kılıç MÖ; Gündoğdu SB; Özden S; Saylam B; Tez M
    Acta Chir Belg; 2018 Feb; 118(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 28669280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.
    Marano L; Boccardi V; Braccio B; Esposito G; Grassia M; Petrillo M; Pezzella M; Porfidia R; Reda G; Romano A; Schettino M; Cosenza A; Izzo G; Di Martino N
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jul; 13():215. PubMed ID: 26179492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lymph node ratio as a predictor of survival in gastric carcinoma.
    Medina-Franco H; Cabrera-Mendoza F; Almaguer-Rosales S; Guillén F; Suárez-Bobadilla YL; Sánchez-Ramón A
    Am Surg; 2013 Mar; 79(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 23461955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Equipping the 8th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Gastric Cancer with the 15-Node Minimum: a Population-Based Study Using Recursive Partitioning Analysis.
    Yuan SQ; Chen YT; Huang ZP
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Oct; 21(10):1591-1598. PubMed ID: 28752402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive value of the 8th edition American Joint Commission Cancer (AJCC) nodal staging system for patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
    Liu J; Ebrahimi A; Low TH; Gao K; Palme CE; Sydney C; Ashford BG; Iyer NG; Clark JR; Gupta R
    J Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 117(4):765-772. PubMed ID: 29049841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th edition) changes for patients with stage III gastric cancer: survival analysis of a large series from a Specialized Eastern Center.
    Lu J; Zheng CH; Cao LL; Ling SW; Li P; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX; Chen QY; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang CM
    Cancer Med; 2017 Oct; 6(10):2179-2187. PubMed ID: 28913982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Rationality of N3 classification and its sub-classification in TNM classification system for advanced gastric cancer].
    Cheng Y; Huang J; Zhu Z; Xu H
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jul; 19(7):749-55. PubMed ID: 27452751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does a Higher Cutoff Value of Lymph Node Retrieval Substantially Improve Survival in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer?-Time to Embrace a New Digit.
    Liu YY; Fang WL; Wang F; Hsu JT; Tsai CY; Liu KH; Yeh CN; Chen TC; Wu RC; Chiu CT; Yeh TS
    Oncologist; 2017 Jan; 22(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 27789777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.