334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29941311)
1. Contralateral suppression of human hearing sensitivity in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Nogueira W; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lopez-Poveda E
Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():121-129. PubMed ID: 29941311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contralateral electrically-evoked suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in single-sided deaf patients.
Dziemba OC; Grafmans D; Merz S; Hocke T
Hear Res; 2017 Mar; 345():52-56. PubMed ID: 28057487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
Gifford RH; Stecker GC
Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved interaural timing of acoustic nerve stimulation affects sound localization in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users.
Seebacher J; Franke-Trieger A; Weichbold V; Zorowka P; Stephan K
Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():19-27. PubMed ID: 30439571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cochlear implant effectiveness in postlingual single-sided deaf individuals: what's the point?
Finke M; Bönitz H; Lyxell B; Illg A
Int J Audiol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):417-423. PubMed ID: 28635507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Binaural Perception in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users with Unrestricted or Restricted Acoustic Hearing in the Non-Implanted Ear.
Dorbeau C; Galvin J; Fu QJ; Legris E; Marx M; Bakhos D
Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(3):187-197. PubMed ID: 30352440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
Bonnard D; Schwalje A; Gantz B; Choi I
Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adult Listeners: Speech-On-Speech Masking and Multitalker Localization.
Rana B; Buchholz JM; Morgan C; Sharma M; Weller T; Konganda SA; Shirai K; Kawano A
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517722106. PubMed ID: 28752811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():185-196. PubMed ID: 28688755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing.
Zamaninezhad L; Hohmann V; Büchner A; Schädler MR; Jürgens T
Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of Tinnitus and Duration of Deafness on Sound Localization and Speech Recognition in Noise in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness.
Liu YW; Cheng X; Chen B; Peng K; Ishiyama A; Fu QJ
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518813802. PubMed ID: 30509148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Krüger B; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():25-37. PubMed ID: 29673567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychoacoustic and electrophysiological electric-acoustic interaction effects in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing.
Imsiecke M; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
Hear Res; 2020 Feb; 386():107873. PubMed ID: 31884220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness.
Zhou X; Li H; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Yuan W
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S41-S48. PubMed ID: 27367147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners.
Dieudonné B; Francart T
Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():78-84. PubMed ID: 29555110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
Yang HI; Zeng FG
Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech intelligibility and subjective benefit in single-sided deaf adults after cochlear implantation.
Finke M; Strauß-Schier A; Kludt E; Büchner A; Illg A
Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():112-119. PubMed ID: 28286233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ipsilateral masking between acoustic and electric stimulations.
Lin P; Turner CW; Gantz BJ; Djalilian HR; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):858-65. PubMed ID: 21877801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants.
Laback B; Egger K; Majdak P
Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():138-50. PubMed ID: 25456088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
