118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29943630)
1. Evaluation of leak pressure and closure time for double-layer esophagotomy closure with an interrupted or a continuous suture pattern.
Schenk AP; Mann FA; Middleton JR; Aeschlimann KA
Am J Vet Res; 2018 Jul; 79(7):787-791. PubMed ID: 29943630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Esophagotomy closure in the dog. A comparison of a double-layer appositional and two single-layer appositional techniques.
Oakes MG; Hosgood G; Snider TG; Hedlund CS; Crawford MP
Vet Surg; 1993; 22(6):451-6. PubMed ID: 8116200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Strength of esophageal closure techniques with and without tissue reinforcement.
Yeginsu A; Ergin M; Erkorkmaz U
World J Surg; 2007 Jul; 31(7):1445-8. PubMed ID: 17534546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of incisional bursting strength of simple continuous and inverted cruciate suture patterns in the equine linea alba.
Magee AA; Galuppo LD
Vet Surg; 1999; 28(6):442-7. PubMed ID: 10582741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a simple continuous versus simple interrupted suture pattern for the repair of a large, open duodenal defect with a jejunal serosal patch in a canine cadaveric model.
Lorange M; Smeak DD
Am J Vet Res; 2020 Dec; 81(12):985-991. PubMed ID: 33251840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Comparison of Ex Vivo Leak Pressures for Four Enterotomy Closures in a Canine Model.
Kieves NR; Krebs AI; Zellner EM
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc; 2018; 54(2):71-76. PubMed ID: 29372866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of leak pressures for single-layer simple continuous suture pattern for cystotomy closure using barbed and monofilament suture material in an ex vivo canine model.
Kieves NR; Krebs AI
Vet Surg; 2017 Apr; 46(3):412-416. PubMed ID: 28177538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single layer cystotomy closure of excised porcine bladders with barbed versus smooth suture material.
Montel JS; Duffy DJ; Weng HY; Freeman LJ
Vet Surg; 2017 May; 46(4):580-586. PubMed ID: 28463428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 3 suture closure techniques for pelvic flexure enterotomy in equine cadaveric large colon.
Aldrich ED; Earnest J; Moorman VJ
Vet Surg; 2017 Apr; 46(3):417-421. PubMed ID: 28158935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of tensile strength and time to closure between an intermittent Aberdeen suture pattern and conventional methods of closure for the body wall of dogs.
Bula E; Upchurch DA; Wang Y; Chen S; Roccabianca S
Am J Vet Res; 2018 Jan; 79(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 29287163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of barbed suture on leak pressures after double-layer inverting closure of cystotomy sites in sheep.
Duffy DJ; Duddy HR; Keating S; Gutierrez-Nibeyro SD
Vet Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(7):902-907. PubMed ID: 30178885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of enterotomy leak pressure among fresh, cooled, and frozen-thawed porcine jejunal segments.
Aeschlimann KA; Mann FA; Middleton JR; Belter RC
Am J Vet Res; 2018 May; 79(5):576-580. PubMed ID: 29688785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ex vivo comparison of barbed sutures for pelvic flexure enterotomy in horses.
Sinovich M; Archer DC; Meunier NV; Kelly PG
Vet Surg; 2020 Apr; 49(3):487-495. PubMed ID: 31724764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of initial leak pressures after single- and double-layer cystotomy closure with barbed and nonbarbed monofilament suture material in an ex vivo ovine model.
Duffy DJ; Kindra CG; Moore GE
Vet Surg; 2019 Apr; 48(3):424-430. PubMed ID: 30635932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bursting strength of surgeon's and self-locking knots for closure of ventral midline celiotomy in horses.
McGlinchey L; Hanson RR; Boone LH; Rosanowski SM; Coleridge M; Souza C; Munsterman AS
Vet Surg; 2018 Nov; 47(8):1080-1086. PubMed ID: 30276828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gastrotomy closure with an over-the-endoscope clip: a randomized, controlled porcine study (with videos).
von Renteln D; Schmidt A; Vassiliou MC; Gieselmann M; Caca K
Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Oct; 70(4):732-9. PubMed ID: 19559416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ex vivo comparison of single-layer and double-layer laparoscopic closure of equine bladders with 2 types of barbed sutures.
Major DS; Duff AH; Cohen ND; Hardy J
Vet Surg; 2017 Nov; 46(8):1145-1153. PubMed ID: 28972268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conventional running suture and continuous double loop closure: an experimental study of wound strength.
Cengiz Y; Månsson P; Israelsson LA
Eur J Surg; 2000 Aug; 166(8):647-9. PubMed ID: 11003435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Suturing technique and the integrity of dural closures: an in vitro study.
Megyesi JF; Ranger A; MacDonald W; Del Maestro RF
Neurosurgery; 2004 Oct; 55(4):950-4; discussion 954-5. PubMed ID: 15458604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of intestinal leak pressure between cadaveric canine and commercial synthetic intestinal tissue that did and did not undergo enterotomy.
Regier PJ; Fealey MJ; Kim SE; Case JB; Garcia-Pereira F
Am J Vet Res; 2020 Oct; 81(10):827-831. PubMed ID: 32969730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
