201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29943925)
21. Laser CO2 conization in postmenopausal age: risk of cervical stenosis and unsatisfactory follow-up.
Penna C; Fambrini M; Fallani MG; Pieralli A; Scarselli G; Marchionni M
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Mar; 96(3):771-5. PubMed ID: 15721425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Recurrent Dysplasia After a Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure: Local Versus General Anesthesia.
Tzur Y; Berkovitz-Shperling R; Laskov I; Grisaru D; Michaan N
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2022 Oct; 26(4):315-318. PubMed ID: 35997172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison between loop electrosurgical excision procedure and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical dysplasia: residual disease in a subsequent hysterectomy specimen.
Huang LW; Hwang JL
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 10094873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Risk stratified management of cervical adenocarcinoma in situ based on cone margin state].
Huang SS; Sui L; Chen LM; Zhang HW; Tao X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 56(9):622-629. PubMed ID: 34547863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.
Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ; DeWitt DE; Line RL
J Fam Pract; 1995 Oct; 41(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 7561706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Factors influencing the choice between cold knife conization and loop electrosurgical excisional procedure for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Shin JW; Rho HS; Park CY
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Feb; 35(1):126-30. PubMed ID: 19215559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision.
Miroshnichenko GG; Parva M; Holtz DO; Klemens JA; Dunton CJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 19098600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. What is the value of pre-surgical variables in addition to cone dimensions in predicting cone margin status?
Giannella L; Di Giuseppe J; Prandi S; Delli Carpini G; Tsiroglou D; Ciavattini A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():180-184. PubMed ID: 31812841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Instead of Cold-Knife Conization for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Women With Unsatisfactory Colposcopic Examinations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
El-Nashar SA; Shazly SA; Hopkins MR; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Famuyide AO
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2017 Apr; 21(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27977541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Photodynamic therapy for management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II and III in young patients and obstetric outcomes.
Choi MC; Jung SG; Park H; Lee SY; Lee C; Hwang YY; Kim SJ
Lasers Surg Med; 2013 Nov; 45(9):564-72. PubMed ID: 24136239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pathologic risk factors for predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP conization.
Kim HJ; Kim KR; Mok JE; Nam JH; Kim YT; Kim YM; Kim JH; Yun SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 May; 105(2):434-8. PubMed ID: 17303228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies.
Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Duggan BD; Roman LD
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 84(6):996-1000. PubMed ID: 7970484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Conization by harmonic scalpel for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a clinicopathological study.
Akahira J; Konno R; Moriya T; Yamakawa H; Igarashi T; Ito K; Sato S; Yajima A
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2000; 50(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 11093051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Relationship between various histological status of margins of LEEP and residual HSIL or worse at hysterectomy following conization].
Xiao YP; Tao X; Zhao CY; Qu YQ; Xie F; Ning Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 30695901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Management of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion patients with positive margin after LEEP conization: A retrospective study.
Abdulaziz AMA; You X; Liu L; Sun Y; Zhang J; Sun S; Li X; Sun W; Dong Y; Liu H; Zhang Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 May; 100(20):e26030. PubMed ID: 34011112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dysplastic endocervical curettings: a predictor of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
Temkin SM; Hellmann M; Lee YC; Abulafia O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 196(5):469.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17466706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion with endocervical cone margin involvement after cervical loop electrosurgical excision: what should a clinician do?
Siriaree S; Srisomboon J; Kietpeerakool C; Khunamornpong S; Siriaunkgul S; Natpratan A; Pratheapjarus S; Futemwong A; Chantarasenawong U
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2006; 7(3):463-6. PubMed ID: 17059346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Large loop versus straight-wire excision of the transformation zone for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial of electrosurgical techniques.
Camargo MJ; Russomano FB; Tristão MA; Huf G; Prendiville W
BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):552-7. PubMed ID: 25516462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pre- and post-conization high-risk HPV testing predicts residual/recurrent disease in patients treated for CIN 2-3.
Alonso I; Torné A; Puig-Tintoré LM; Esteve R; Quinto L; Campo E; Pahisa J; Ordi J
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Nov; 103(2):631-6. PubMed ID: 16780934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
