These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

586 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29944088)

  • 1. Automated Volumetric Analysis of Mammographic Density in a Screening Setting: Worse Outcomes for Women with Dense Breasts.
    Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Lee CI; Akslen LA; Tsuruda KM; Elmore JG; Hofvind S
    Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 29944088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screening Outcomes of Supplemental Automated Breast US in Asian Women with Dense and Nondense Breasts.
    Kwon MR; Choi JS; Lee MY; Kim S; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK
    Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222435. PubMed ID: 37097135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer.
    Brem RF; Hoffmeister JW; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Mohtashemi K; Jindal G; Disimio MP; Rogers SK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 15671360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Harada-Shoji N; Suzuki A; Ishida T; Zheng YF; Narikawa-Shiono Y; Sato-Tadano A; Ohta R; Ohuchi N
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2121505. PubMed ID: 34406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supplemental magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging or mammography by extent of breast density.
    Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Su YR; Sprague BL; Stout NK; Onega T; O'Meara ES; Henderson LM; Tosteson ANA; Wernli K; Miglioretti DL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2024 Feb; 116(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 37897090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women.
    Sawada T; Akashi S; Nakamura S; Kuwayama T; Enokido K; Yoshida M; Hashimoto R; Ide T; Masuda H; Taruno K; Oyama H; Takamaru T; Kanada Y; Ikeda M; Kosugi N; Sato H; Nakayama S; Ata A; Tonouchi Y; Sakai H; Matsunaga Y; Matsutani A
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Sep; 24(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 28238177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Risk of Interval Invasive and Advanced Breast Cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Su YR; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Buist DSM; Onega T; Henderson LM; Alsheik N; Bissell MCS; O'Meara ES; Lee CI; Miglioretti DL
    JAMA; 2022 Jun; 327(22):2220-2230. PubMed ID: 35699706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.
    Conant EF; Barlow WE; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Beaber EF; Tosteson ANA; Haas JS; Lowry KP; Stout NK; Trentham-Dietz A; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Li CI; Schnall MD; Onega T; Sprague BL;
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 May; 5(5):635-642. PubMed ID: 30816931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast-specific gamma imaging for the detection of breast cancer in dense versus nondense breasts.
    Rechtman LR; Lenihan MJ; Lieberman JH; Teal CB; Torrente J; Rapelyea JA; Brem RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 24450668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2).
    Tagliafico AS; Mariscotti G; Valdora F; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Sormani MP; Signori A; Calabrese M; Houssami N
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():39-46. PubMed ID: 30316869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Focal Breast Pain: Does Breast Density Affect the Need for Ultrasound?
    Cho MW; Grimm LJ; Johnson KS
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 27746121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Positive predictive values by mammographic density and screening mode in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Moshina N; Ursin G; Roman M; Sebuødegård S; Hofvind S
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):248-254. PubMed ID: 26724673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AI performance by mammographic density in a retrospective cohort study of 99,489 participants in BreastScreen Norway.
    Bergan MB; Larsen M; Moshina N; Bartsch H; Koch HW; Aase HS; Satybaldinov Z; Haldorsen IHS; Lee CI; Hofvind S
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Oct; 34(10):6298-6308. PubMed ID: 38528136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk factors and tumor characteristics of interval cancers by mammographic density.
    Holm J; Humphreys K; Li J; Ploner A; Cheddad A; Eriksson M; Törnberg S; Hall P; Czene K
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(9):1030-7. PubMed ID: 25646195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of screening whole-breast sonography as a supplemental tool in conjunction with mammography in women with dense breasts.
    Chae EY; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Kim H
    J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Sep; 32(9):1573-8. PubMed ID: 23980217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammographic density and interval cancers in mammographic screening: Moving towards more personalized screening.
    Larsen M; Lynge E; Lee CI; Lång K; Hofvind S
    Breast; 2023 Jun; 69():306-311. PubMed ID: 36966656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of mammographic breast density on breast cancer screening performance: a study in Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
    van Gils CH; Otten JD; Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1998 Apr; 52(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 9616416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Women With Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk and Dense Breasts.
    Sorin V; Yagil Y; Yosepovich A; Shalmon A; Gotlieb M; Neiman OH; Sklair-Levy M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):W267-W274. PubMed ID: 30240292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.