These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29944698)

  • 1. Auditory traits of "own voice".
    Kimura M; Yotsumoto Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199443. PubMed ID: 29944698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Human Takes It All: Humanlike Synthesized Voices Are Perceived as Less Eerie and More Likable. Evidence From a Subjective Ratings Study.
    Kühne K; Fischer MH; Zhou Y
    Front Neurorobot; 2020; 14():593732. PubMed ID: 33390923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neural representations of own-voice in the human auditory cortex.
    Hosaka T; Kimura M; Yotsumoto Y
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):591. PubMed ID: 33436798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. I like my voice better: self-enhancement bias in perceptions of voice attractiveness.
    Hughes SM; Harrison MA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):941-9. PubMed ID: 24386714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness.
    Kätsyri J; Förger K; Mäkäräinen M; Takala T
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():390. PubMed ID: 25914661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. I Hear My Voice; Therefore I Spoke: The Sense of Agency Over Speech Is Enhanced by Hearing One's Own Voice.
    Ohata R; Asai T; Imaizumi S; Imamizu H
    Psychol Sci; 2022 Aug; 33(8):1226-1239. PubMed ID: 35787212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The perception of humanness from the movements of synthetic agents.
    Thompson JC; Trafton JG; McKnight P
    Perception; 2011; 40(6):695-704. PubMed ID: 21936298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feeling robots and human zombies: mind perception and the uncanny valley.
    Gray K; Wegner DM
    Cognition; 2012 Oct; 125(1):125-30. PubMed ID: 22784682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A reappraisal of the uncanny valley: categorical perception or frequency-based sensitization?
    Burleigh TJ; Schoenherr JR
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1488. PubMed ID: 25653623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A mismatch in the human realism of face and voice produces an uncanny valley.
    Mitchell WJ; Szerszen KA; Lu AS; Schermerhorn PW; Scheutz M; Macdorman KF
    Iperception; 2011; 2(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 23145223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Walking in the uncanny valley: importance of the attractiveness on the acceptance of a robot as a working partner.
    Destephe M; Brandao M; Kishi T; Zecca M; Hashimoto K; Takanishi A
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():204. PubMed ID: 25762967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low is large: spatial location and pitch interact in voice-based body size estimation.
    Pisanski K; Isenstein SGE; Montano KJ; O'Connor JJM; Feinberg DR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1239-1251. PubMed ID: 28229428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating the uncanny valley for prosthetic hands.
    Poliakoff E; O'Kane S; Carefoot O; Kyberd P; Gowen E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):21-27. PubMed ID: 29412089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding the Uncanny: Both Atypical Features and Category Ambiguity Provoke Aversion toward Humanlike Robots.
    Strait MK; Floerke VA; Ju W; Maddox K; Remedios JD; Jung MF; Urry HL
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1366. PubMed ID: 28912736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological correlates of voice memory for young and old speakers in young and old listeners.
    Zäske R; Limbach K; Schneider D; Skuk VG; Dobel C; Guntinas-Lichius O; Schweinberger SR
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jul; 116(Pt B):215-227. PubMed ID: 28802769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interactions between observer and stimuli fertility status: Endocrine and perceptual responses to intrasexual vocal fertility cues.
    Ostrander GM; Pipitone RN; Shoup-Knox ML
    Horm Behav; 2018 Feb; 98():191-197. PubMed ID: 29277698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early auditory sensory processing of voices is facilitated by visual mechanisms.
    Schall S; Kiebel SJ; Maess B; von Kriegstein K
    Neuroimage; 2013 Aug; 77():237-45. PubMed ID: 23563227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The processing of auditory and visual recognition of self-stimuli.
    Hughes SM; Nicholson SE
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Dec; 19(4):1124-34. PubMed ID: 20347341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of stimulus complexity on the preattentive processing of self-generated and nonself voices: An ERP study.
    Conde T; Gonçalves ÓF; Pinheiro AP
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 16(1):106-23. PubMed ID: 26415897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Venturing into the uncanny valley of mind-The influence of mind attribution on the acceptance of human-like characters in a virtual reality setting.
    Stein JP; Ohler P
    Cognition; 2017 Mar; 160():43-50. PubMed ID: 28043026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.