These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Bladder distension improves the dosimetry of organs at risk during intracavitary cervical high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Harmon G; Chinsky B; Surucu M; Harkenrider M; Small W Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 26521661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of bladder distension on doses to organs at risk in Pulsed-Dose-Rate 3D image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Nesseler JP; Charra-Brunaud C; Salleron J; Py JF; Huertas A; Meknaci E; Courrech F; Peiffert D; Renard-Oldrini S Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(5):976-980. PubMed ID: 28694116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early outcomes and impact of a hybrid IC/IS applicator for a new MRI-based cervical brachytherapy program. Harkenrider MM; Surucu M; Harmon G; Mysz ML; Shea SM; Yacoub J; Goldberg A; Liotta M; Winder A; Potkul R; Roeske JC; Small W Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(1):187-193. PubMed ID: 29089277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Techniques for and uncertainties of MRI-based reconstruction of titanium tandem and ring brachytherapy applicators. Malajovich I; Anamalayil S; Dolney OV; Kevin Teo BK; Arscott WT; Taunk NK Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(5):651-658. PubMed ID: 32624406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utrecht Interstitial Applicator Shifts and DVH Parameter Changes in 3D CT-based HDR Brachytherapy of Cervical Cancer. Shi D; He MY; Zhao ZP; Wu N; Zhao HF; Xu ZJ; Cheng GH Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(9):3945-9. PubMed ID: 25987066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in cervical cancer brachytherapy target and normal tissue contouring. Eskander RN; Scanderbeg D; Saenz CC; Brown M; Yashar C Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Jan; 20(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 20130502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A novel two-step optimization method for tandem and ovoid high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer. Sharma M; Fields EC; Todor DA Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(5):613-8. PubMed ID: 26092424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy of cervical cancer using the novel hybrid applicator Venezia: Clinical feasibility and initial results. Walter F; Maihöfer C; Schüttrumpf L; Well J; Burges A; Ertl-Wagner B; Mahner S; Belka C; Gallwas J; Corradini S Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(5):775-781. PubMed ID: 29941345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Dosimetric Influence of Applicator Displacement on 2D and 3D Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer Treatment. Wu A; Tang D; Wu A; Liu Y; Qian L; Zhu L Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():15330338211041201. PubMed ID: 34569371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of offline adaptive planning techniques in image-guided brachytherapy of cervical cancer. Liu H; Kinard J; Maurer J; Shang Q; Vanderstraeten C; Hayes L; Sintay B; Wiant D J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 19(6):316-322. PubMed ID: 30284370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A knowledge-based organ dose prediction tool for brachytherapy treatment planning of patients with cervical cancer. Yusufaly TI; Kallis K; Simon A; Mayadev J; Yashar CM; Einck JP; Mell LK; Brown D; Scanderbeg D; Hild SJ; Covele B; Moore KL; Meyers SM Brachytherapy; 2020; 19(5):624-634. PubMed ID: 32513446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proof of principle: Applicator-guided stereotactic IMRT boost in combination with 3D MRI-based brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer. Assenholt MS; Vestergaard A; Kallehauge JF; Mohamed S; Nielsen SK; Petersen JB; Fokdal L; Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):361-8. PubMed ID: 24656732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical feasibility of interstitial brachytherapy using a "hybrid" applicator combining uterine tandem and interstitial metal needles based on CT for locally advanced cervical cancer. Liu ZS; Guo J; Lin X; Wang HY; Qiu L; Ren XJ; Li YF; Zhang BY; Wang TJ Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(5):562-9. PubMed ID: 27474180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long term experience with 3D image guided brachytherapy and clinical outcome in cervical cancer patients. Ribeiro I; Janssen H; De Brabandere M; Nulens A; De Bal D; Vergote I; Van Limbergen E Radiother Oncol; 2016 Sep; 120(3):447-454. PubMed ID: 27157510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single magnetic resonance imaging vs magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography planning in cervical cancer brachytherapy. Beriwal S; Kim H; Coon D; Mogus R; Heron DE; Li X; Huq MS Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2009 Aug; 21(6):483-7. PubMed ID: 19423307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Point A vs. HR-CTV D Harmon G; Diak A; Shea SM; Yacoub JH; Small W; Harkenrider MM Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(6):825-831. PubMed ID: 27693173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direction-modulated brachytherapy for high-dose-rate treatment of cervical cancer. I: theoretical design. Han DY; Webster MJ; Scanderbeg DJ; Yashar C; Choi D; Song B; Devic S; Ravi A; Song WY Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jul; 89(3):666-73. PubMed ID: 24751413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vaginal Dose Is Associated With Toxicity in Image Guided Tandem Ring or Ovoid-Based Brachytherapy. Susko M; Craciunescu O; Meltsner S; Yang Y; Steffey B; Cai J; Chino J Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Apr; 94(5):1099-105. PubMed ID: 26883564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]