These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29946644)

  • 1. [Comparison of clinical efficacy of CAD/CAM all -ceramic inlay and polymerid porcelain inlay in restoration of posterior Class II cavity].
    Yu WQ; Yu M; Yao LL; Wang CH; Wang M; Fan C
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2018 Feb; 27(1):61-64. PubMed ID: 29946644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cement Thickness of Inlay Restorations Made of Lithium Disilicate, Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic and Nano-Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Evaluated Using 3D X-Ray Micro-Computed Tomography.
    Uzgur R; Ercan E; Uzgur Z; Çolak H; Yalçın M; Özcan M
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jun; 27(5):456-460. PubMed ID: 27517616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ceramic inlays: a case presentation and lessons learned from the literature.
    Boushell LW; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 19368595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2000 Jun; 108(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 10872995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture load of CAD/CAM-generated slot-inlay FPDs.
    Bindl A; Lüthy H; Mörmann WH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):653-60. PubMed ID: 14714847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Chairside CAD/CAM Restoration Type on Marginal Fit Accuracy: A Comparison of Crown, Inlay and Onlay Restorations.
    Merrill TC; Mackey T; Luc R; Lung D; Naseem A; Abduo J
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 May; 29(2):119-127. PubMed ID: 33393741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical Evaluation of Three Types of CAD/CAM Inlay/ Onlay Materials After 1-Year Clinical Follow Up.
    Aslan YU; Coskun E; Ozkan Y; Dard M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 Aug; 27(3):131-140. PubMed ID: 31469259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of CAD-CAM porcelain restorations.
    LoPresti JT; David S; Calamia JR
    Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 9002814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment.
    Sturdevant JR; Bayne SC; Heymann HO
    J Esthet Dent; 1999; 11(4):206-14. PubMed ID: 10825877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite.
    Sjögren G; Molin M; van Dijken JW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 15119879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of two different CAD-CAM inlay-onlays in a split-mouth study: 2-year clinical follow-up.
    Coşkun E; Aslan YU; Özkan YK
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Mar; 32(2):244-250. PubMed ID: 31642587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture risk of lithium-disilicate ceramic inlays: a finite element analysis.
    Holberg C; Winterhalder P; Wichelhaus A; Hickel R; Huth K
    Dent Mater; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1244-50. PubMed ID: 24119917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of cavity preparation design and ceramic type on the stress distribution, strain and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM onlays in molars.
    Vianna ALSV; Prado CJD; Bicalho AA; Pereira RADS; Neves FDD; Soares CJ
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2018; 26():e20180004. PubMed ID: 30133672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical examination of inlay geometries--is there a basic biomechanical principle?
    Arnetzl GV; Arnetzl G
    Int J Comput Dent; 2009; 12(2):119-30. PubMed ID: 19413268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a four-year study.
    Heymann HO; Bayne SC; Sturdevant JR; Wilder AD; Roberson TM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Aug; 127(8):1171-81. PubMed ID: 8803392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD/CAM inlays and partial coverage restorations: 3-year results of a prospective clinical study over 5 years.
    Spitznagel FA; Scholz KJ; Strub JR; Vach K; Gierthmuehlen PC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jun; 22(5):1973-1983. PubMed ID: 29214376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: a 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays.
    Otto T; De Nisco S
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 11951800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tooth-colored posterior restorations using Cerec Method (CAD/CAM)-generated ceramic inlays.
    David SB; LoPresti JT
    Compendium; 1994 Jun; 15(6):802, 804, 806 passim; quiz 810. PubMed ID: 7994733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.