212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29946972)
1. Trunk Hybrid Passive-Active Musculoskeletal Modeling to Determine the Detailed T12-S1 Response Under In Vivo Loads.
Khoddam-Khorasani P; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Nov; 46(11):1830-1843. PubMed ID: 29946972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A combined passive and active musculoskeletal model study to estimate L4-L5 load sharing.
Azari F; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A; Rahimi-Moghaddam T
J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():157-165. PubMed ID: 28527584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Load-sharing in the lumbosacral spine in neutral standing & flexed postures - A combined finite element and inverse static study.
Liu T; Khalaf K; Naserkhaki S; El-Rich M
J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():43-50. PubMed ID: 29153706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel coupled musculoskeletal finite element model of the spine - Critical evaluation of trunk models in some tasks.
Rajaee MA; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
J Biomech; 2021 Apr; 119():110331. PubMed ID: 33631665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of spinal disc translational stiffness on the lumbar spinal loads, ligament forces and trunk muscle forces during upper body inclination.
Arshad R; Zander T; Bashkuev M; Schmidt H
Med Eng Phys; 2017 Aug; 46():54-62. PubMed ID: 28666589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subject-specific loads on the lumbar spine in detailed finite element models scaled geometrically and kinematic-driven by radiography images.
Dehghan-Hamani I; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2019 Apr; 35(4):e3182. PubMed ID: 30682237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Novel force-displacement control passive finite element models of the spine to simulate intact and pathological conditions; comparisons with traditional passive and detailed musculoskeletal models.
Abbasi-Ghiri A; Ebrahimkhani M; Arjmand N
J Biomech; 2022 Aug; 141():111173. PubMed ID: 35705381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Subject-specific biomechanics of trunk: musculoskeletal scaling, internal loads and intradiscal pressure estimation.
Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N; El-Ouaaid Z; Plamondon A
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2016 Dec; 15(6):1699-1712. PubMed ID: 27169402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of lumbo-pelvic rhythm on trunk muscle forces and disc loads during forward flexion: A combined musculoskeletal and finite element simulation study.
Liu T; Khalaf K; Adeeb S; El-Rich M
J Biomech; 2019 Jan; 82():116-123. PubMed ID: 30389260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol.
Goel VK; Grauer JN; Patel TCh; Biyani A; Sairyo K; Vishnubhotla S; Matyas A; Cowgill I; Shaw M; Long R; Dick D; Panjabi MM; Serhan H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Dec; 30(24):2755-64. PubMed ID: 16371899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Loads distributed in vivo among vertebrae, muscles, spinal ligaments, and intervertebral discs in a passively flexed lumbar spine.
Mörl F; Günther M; Riede JM; Hammer M; Schmitt S
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Dec; 19(6):2015-2047. PubMed ID: 32314072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calibration and validation of a novel hybrid model of the lumbosacral spine in ArtiSynth-The passive structures.
Remus R; Lipphaus A; Neumann M; Bender B
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0250456. PubMed ID: 33901222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of motion segment simulation and joint positioning on spinal loads in trunk musculoskeletal models.
Ghezelbash F; Eskandari AH; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N; El-Ouaaid Z; Plamondon A
J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 70():149-156. PubMed ID: 28797595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relative performances of artificial neural network and regression mapping tools in evaluation of spinal loads and muscle forces during static lifting.
Arjmand N; Ekrami O; Shirazi-Adl A; Plamondon A; Parnianpour M
J Biomech; 2013 May; 46(8):1454-62. PubMed ID: 23541615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the load-sharing along the ligamentous lumbosacral spine in flexed and extended postures: Finite element study.
Naserkhaki S; Jaremko JL; Adeeb S; El-Rich M
J Biomech; 2016 Apr; 49(6):974-982. PubMed ID: 26493346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of muscle dysfunction on lumbar spine mechanics. A finite element study based on a two motion segments model.
Kong WZ; Goel VK; Gilbertson LG; Weinstein JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Oct; 21(19):2197-206; discussion 2206-7. PubMed ID: 8902963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjacent segments biomechanics following lumbar fusion surgery: a musculoskeletal finite element model study.
Ebrahimkhani M; Arjmand N; Shirazi-Adl A
Eur Spine J; 2022 Jul; 31(7):1630-1639. PubMed ID: 35633382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Subject-specific regression equations to estimate lower spinal loads during symmetric and asymmetric static lifting.
Ghezelbash F; Shirazi-Adl A; El Ouaaid Z; Plamondon A; Arjmand N
J Biomech; 2020 Mar; 102():109550. PubMed ID: 31932024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anterior thoracic posture increases thoracolumbar disc loading.
Harrison DE; Colloca CJ; Harrison DD; Janik TJ; Haas JW; Keller TS
Eur Spine J; 2005 Apr; 14(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 15168237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
