BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29948105)

  • 21. Post-treatment FDG PET-CT in head and neck carcinoma: comparative analysis of 4 qualitative interpretative criteria in a large patient cohort.
    Zhong J; Sundersingh M; Dyker K; Currie S; Vaidyanathan S; Prestwich R; Scarsbrook A
    Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4086. PubMed ID: 32139722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. PET-CT scan-based maximum standardized uptake value as a prognostic predictor in oropharynx squamous cell cancer.
    Patel Y; Srivastava S; Rana D; Goel A; Suryanarayana K; Saini SK
    Cancer Treat Res Commun; 2021; 26():100305. PubMed ID: 33461080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biomechanical imaging biomarker during chemoradiotherapy predicts treatment response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    Fujimoto K; Shiinoki T; Kawazoe Y; Yuasa Y; Mukaidani W; Manabe Y; Kajima M; Tanaka H
    Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(5):. PubMed ID: 38359451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. CT and FDG-PET radiologic biomarkers in p16+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
    Rosen BS; Wilkie JR; Sun Y; Ibrahim M; Casper KA; Miller JE; Chotchutipan T; Stucken CL; Bradford C; Prince MEP; Rosko AJ; Malloy KM; McLean SA; Chinn SB; Shuman AG; Spector ME; Swiecicki PL; Worden FP; Shah JL; Schonewolf CA; Chapman CH; Eisbruch A; Mierzwa ML
    Radiother Oncol; 2021 Feb; 155():174-181. PubMed ID: 33069764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Value of metabolic tumor volume on repeated 18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
    Huang W; Fan M; Liu B; Fu Z; Zhou T; Zhang Z; Gong H; Li B
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Oct; 55(10):1584-90. PubMed ID: 25214640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prognostic Value of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Comparison with
    Risør LM; Clausen MM; Ujmajuridze Z; Farhadi M; Andersen KF; Loft A; Friborg J; Kjaer A
    J Nucl Med; 2022 Aug; 63(8):1169-1176. PubMed ID: 34857658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can adaptive threshold-based metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and lean body mass corrected standard uptake value (SUL) predict prognosis in head and neck cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy?
    Akagunduz OO; Savas R; Yalman D; Kocacelebi K; Esassolak M
    Nucl Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 42(11):899-904. PubMed ID: 26275933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. FDG volumetric parameters and survival outcomes after definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    Paidpally V; Chirindel A; Chung CH; Richmon J; Koch W; Quon H; Subramaniam RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Aug; 203(2):W139-45. PubMed ID: 25055289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the Prognostic Value of FDG PET/CT Parameters for Patients With Surgically Treated Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review.
    Creff G; Devillers A; Depeursinge A; Palard-Novello X; Acosta O; Jegoux F; Castelli J
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 May; 146(5):471-479. PubMed ID: 32215611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The prognostic effect of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters in locally advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
    Sakin A; Ozcelik M; Sahin S; Aydemir O; Aldemir MN; Iliklerden UH; Kotan MC
    Surg Oncol; 2022 Aug; 43():101809. PubMed ID: 35809492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prognostic value of textural indices extracted from pretherapeutic 18-F FDG-PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    Guezennec C; Robin P; Orlhac F; Bourhis D; Delcroix O; Gobel Y; Rousset J; Schick U; Salaün PY; Abgral R
    Head Neck; 2019 Feb; 41(2):495-502. PubMed ID: 30549149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prognostic value comparison between (18)F-FLT PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT volume-based metabolic parameters in patients with head and neck cancer.
    Hoshikawa H; Mori T; Yamamoto Y; Kishino T; Fukumura T; Samukawa Y; Mori N; Nishiyama Y
    Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Jun; 40(6):464-8. PubMed ID: 25546204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of FDG PET metabolic tumour volume versus ADC histogram: prognostic value of tumour treatment response and survival in patients with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer.
    Ueno Y; Lisbona R; Tamada T; Alaref A; Sugimura K; Reinhold C
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Jul; 90(1075):20170035. PubMed ID: 28508679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters including visual evaluation in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    Koyasu S; Nakamoto Y; Kikuchi M; Suzuki K; Hayashida K; Itoh K; Togashi K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Apr; 202(4):851-8. PubMed ID: 24660716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prognostic significance of volume-based FDG PET/CT parameters in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer treated with chemoradiation therapy.
    Choi HJ; Lee JW; Kang B; Song SY; Lee JD; Lee JH
    Yonsei Med J; 2014 Nov; 55(6):1498-506. PubMed ID: 25323885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. FDG uptake in normal tissues assessed by PET during treatment has prognostic value for treatment results in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas undergoing radiochemotherapy.
    Zschaeck S; Löck S; Leger S; Haase R; Bandurska-Luque A; Appold S; Kotzerke J; Zips D; Richter C; Gudziol V; Schreiber A; Zöphel K; Baumann M; Krause M
    Radiother Oncol; 2017 Mar; 122(3):437-444. PubMed ID: 28222892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Pretreatment FDG-PET metrics in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235.
    Ohri N; Duan F; Machtay M; Gorelick JJ; Snyder BS; Alavi A; Siegel BA; Johnson DW; Bradley JD; DeNittis A; Werner-Wasik M
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Apr; 107(4):. PubMed ID: 25688115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Response evaluation of cervical lymph nodes after chemoradiation in patients with head and neck cancer - does additional [18F]FDG-PET-CT help?
    Dejaco D; Uprimny C; Widmann G; Riedl D; Moser P; Arnold C; Steinbichler TB; Kofler B; Schartinger VH; Virgolini I; Riechelmann H
    Cancer Imaging; 2020 Sep; 20(1):69. PubMed ID: 32993805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prognostic value of response assessment fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan in radically treated squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: Long-term results of a prospective study.
    Ghosh-Laskar S; Mummudi N; Rangarajan V; Purandare N; Gupta T; Budrukkar A; Murthy V; Agarwal JP
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2019; 15(3):596-603. PubMed ID: 31169226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment
    Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.