These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29948524)
1. Pit Latrines: A Noninvasive Sampling Strategy to Assess Fecal Pathogen Occurrence in Low Resource Communities. LaHue N; Alexander KA J Community Health; 2018 Dec; 43(6):1155-1160. PubMed ID: 29948524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is there a difference in prevalence of helminths between households using ecological sanitation and those using traditional pit latrines? A latrine based cross sectional comparative study in Malawi. Kumwenda S; Msefula C; Kadewa W; Diness Y; Kato C; Morse T; Ngwira B BMC Res Notes; 2017 Jun; 10(1):200. PubMed ID: 28599671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of community led total sanitation and hygiene approach on improvement of latrine utilization in Laelay Maichew District, North Ethiopia. A comparative cross-sectional study. Gebremariam B; Hagos G; Abay M PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203458. PubMed ID: 30192803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pit Latrine Fecal Sludge Resistance Using a Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Low Income Areas in Mzuzu City, Malawi. Chirwa CF; Hall RP; Krometis LH; Vance EA; Edwards A; Guan T; Holm RH Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 28165378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fecal indicator and Ascaris removal from double pit latrine content. Dey D; Ridwanul Haque AT; Kabir B; Ubaid SF J Water Health; 2016 Dec; 14(6):972-979. PubMed ID: 27959875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advantages and limitations for users of double pit pour-flush latrines: a qualitative study in rural Bangladesh. Hussain F; Clasen T; Akter S; Bawel V; Luby SP; Leontsini E; Unicomb L; Barua MK; Thomas B; Winch PJ BMC Public Health; 2017 May; 17(1):515. PubMed ID: 28545427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing patterns and determinants of latrine use in rural settings: A longitudinal study in Odisha, India. Sinha A; Nagel CL; Schmidt WP; Torondel B; Boisson S; Routray P; Clasen TF Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 220(5):906-915. PubMed ID: 28529019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inactivation of pathogens in ecological sanitation latrines in Malawi: An observational follow up study. Kumwenda S; Msefula C; Kadewa W; Makupe DJ; Ngwira B; Morse T Malawi Med J; 2019 Mar; 31(1):12-18. PubMed ID: 31143391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Cross Sectional Study of the Association between Sanitation Type and Fecal Contamination of the Household Environment in Rural Bangladesh. Huda TMN; Schmidt WP; Pickering AJ; Mahmud ZH; Islam MS; Rahman MS; Luby SP; Biran A Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2018 Apr; 98(4):967-976. PubMed ID: 29436345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cluster-randomized multi-level intervention to increase latrine use and safe disposal of child feces in rural Odisha, India: the Sundara Grama research protocol. Caruso BA; Sclar GD; Routray P; Majorin F; Nagel C; Clasen T BMC Public Health; 2019 Mar; 19(1):322. PubMed ID: 30885158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of sampling depth on pathogen detection in pit latrines. Capone D; Chigwechokha P; de Los Reyes FL; Holm RH; Risk BB; Tilley E; Brown J PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2021 Mar; 15(3):e0009176. PubMed ID: 33651818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Community-Led Total Sanitation and the rate of latrine ownership. Zeleke DA; Gelaye KA; Mekonnen FA BMC Res Notes; 2019 Jan; 12(1):14. PubMed ID: 30642395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adopt or Adapt: Sanitation Technology Choices in Urbanizing Malawi. Chunga RM; Ensink JH; Jenkins MW; Brown J PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161262. PubMed ID: 27532871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pit latrine fill-up rates: variation determinants and public health implications in informal settlements, Nakuru-Kenya. Gudda FO; Moturi WN; Oduor OS; Muchiri EW; Ensink J BMC Public Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):68. PubMed ID: 30646871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antibiotic resistance profiles of coagulase-positive and coagulase-negative staphylococci from pit latrine fecal sludge in a peri-urban South African community. Beukes LS; Schmidt S Folia Microbiol (Praha); 2018 Sep; 63(5):645-651. PubMed ID: 29663126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Pit latrine emptying behavior and demand for sanitation services in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania. Jenkins MW; Cumming O; Cairncross S Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Feb; 12(3):2588-611. PubMed ID: 25734790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bacterial Contamination on Latrine Surfaces in Community and Household Latrines in Kathmandu, Nepal. McGinnis S; Marini D; Amatya P; Murphy HM Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jan; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 30658441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Latent variable modeling to develop a robust proxy for sensitive behaviors: application to latrine use behavior and its association with sanitation access in a middle-income country. Lopez VK; West BT; Clarke PJ; Quentin E; Eisenberg JNS BMC Public Health; 2019 Jan; 19(1):90. PubMed ID: 30660198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Within-Compound Versus Public Latrine Access and Child Feces Disposal Practices in Low-Income Neighborhoods of Accra, Ghana. Ritter RL; Peprah D; Null C; Moe CL; Armah G; Ampofo J; Wellington N; Yakubu H; Robb K; Kirby AE; Wang Y; Roguski K; Reese H; Agbemabiese CA; Adomako LAB; Freeman MC; Baker KK Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2018 May; 98(5):1250-1259. PubMed ID: 29557327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why latrines are not used: communities' perceptions and practices regarding latrines in a Taenia solium endemic rural area in Eastern Zambia. Thys S; Mwape KE; Lefèvre P; Dorny P; Marcotty T; Phiri AM; Phiri IK; Gabriël S PLoS Negl Trop Dis; 2015 Mar; 9(3):e0003570. PubMed ID: 25739017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]