BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29948964)

  • 1. Economic Evaluation for USA of Systemic Chemotherapies as First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.
    Gharaibeh M; McBride A; Alberts DS; Slack M; Erstad B; Alsaid N; Bootman JL; Abraham I
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Oct; 36(10):1273-1284. PubMed ID: 29948964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Paclitaxel as Albumin-Bound Nanoparticles with Gemcitabine for Untreated Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
    Stainthorpe A; Greenhalgh J; Bagust A; Richardson M; Boland A; Beale S; Duarte R; Kotas E; Banks L; Palmer D
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Oct; 36(10):1153-1163. PubMed ID: 29600384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic Evaluation for the UK of Systemic Chemotherapies as First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer.
    Gharaibeh M; McBride A; Alberts DS; Erstad B; Slack M; Alsaid N; Bootman JL; Abraham I
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1333-1343. PubMed ID: 29981004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Economic evaluation for the US of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine in the treatment of metastatic pancreas cancer.
    Gharaibeh M; McBride A; Bootman JL; Patel H; Abraham I
    J Med Econ; 2017 Apr; 20(4):345-352. PubMed ID: 27919186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Economic evaluation for the UK of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in the treatment of metastatic pancreas cancer.
    Gharaibeh M; McBride A; Bootman JL; Abraham I
    Br J Cancer; 2015 Apr; 112(8):1301-5. PubMed ID: 25791875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of FOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel as adjuvant treatment for resected pancreatic cancer in the United States based on PRODIGE-24 and APACT trials.
    Kharat AA; Nelson R; Au T; Biskupiak J
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2021 Oct; 27(10):1367-1375. PubMed ID: 34595948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus folfirinox in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer in china.
    Cui J; Zhang X; Qu S; Wang L
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2021 Aug; 21(4):691-697. PubMed ID: 32976031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Real-World Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Gemcitabine Plus Nab-Paclitaxel vs FOLFIRINOX in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.
    Arciero V; Luo J; Parmar A; Dai WF; Beca JM; Raphael MJ; Isaranuwatchai W; Habbous S; Tadrous M; Earle CC; Biagi JJ; Mittmann N; Arias J; Gavura S; Chan KKW
    JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2022 Jul; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 35758620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for metastatic pancreatic cancer based on PRODIGE and MPACT trials.
    Zhou J; Zhao R; Wen F; Zhang P; Wu Y; Tang R; Chen H; Zhang J; Li Q
    Tumori; 2016 Jun; 2016(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 27056335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of gemcitabine for metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Takeda AL; Jones J; Loveman E; Tan SC; Clegg AJ
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 May; 11(19):iii, ix-xi, 1-62. PubMed ID: 17462169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-utility analysis of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) in combination with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer in Spain: results of the PANCOSTABRAX study.
    Carrato A; García P; López R; Macarulla T; Rivera F; Sastre J; Gostkorzewicz J; Benedit P; Pérez-Alcántara F
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2015; 15(4):579-89. PubMed ID: 25991037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Value of Survival Gains in Pancreatic Cancer from Novel Treatment Regimens.
    MacEwan JP; Yin W; Kaura S; Khan ZM
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Feb; 23(2):206-213. PubMed ID: 28125374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Systemic Therapies in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer in the Canadian Health Care System.
    Coyle D; Ko YJ; Coyle K; Saluja R; Shah K; Lien K; Lam H; Chan KK
    Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):586-592. PubMed ID: 28408000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Economic Evaluation of Cisplatin Plus Gemcitabine Versus Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine for the Treatment of First-Line Advanced Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in China: Using Markov Model and Partitioned Survival Model.
    Rui M; Shi F; Shang Y; Meng R; Li H
    Adv Ther; 2020 Sep; 37(9):3761-3774. PubMed ID: 32647912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-Effectiveness of Nab-Paclitaxel and Gemcitabine Versus Gemcitabine Monotherapy for Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer in Japan.
    Morimoto K; Moriwaki K; Kaneyasu T; Nakayama H; Shimozuma K
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2022 Mar; 28():54-60. PubMed ID: 34800832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Clegg A; Scott DA; Sidhu M; Hewitson P; Waugh N
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(32):1-195. PubMed ID: 12065068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Italian cost-effectiveness analysis of paclitaxel albumin (nab-paclitaxel) + gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients: the APICE study.
    Lazzaro C; Barone C; Caprioni F; Cascinu S; Falcone A; Maiello E; Milella M; Pinto C; Reni M; Tortora G
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2018 Aug; 18(4):435-446. PubMed ID: 29641931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of Gemcitabine Plus Modern Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.
    Leung HW; Chan AL; Muo CH
    Clin Ther; 2016 May; 38(5):1174-83. PubMed ID: 27033672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of oxaliplatin and capecitabine for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Pandor A; Eggington S; Paisley S; Tappenden P; Sutcliffe P
    Health Technol Assess; 2006 Nov; 10(41):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-185. PubMed ID: 17049138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using economic analysis to evaluate the potential of multimodality therapy for elderly patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.
    Krzyzanowska MK; Earle CC; Kuntz KM; Weeks JC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Jan; 67(1):211-8. PubMed ID: 17189071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.