These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29949491)
1. Personhood and the Three Branches of Government. Cohen IG; Adashi EY N Engl J Med; 2018 Jun; 378(26):2453-2455. PubMed ID: 29949491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Brain birth: a proposal for defining when a fetus is entitled to human life status. Gertler GB South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1061-78. PubMed ID: 11655850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Human Life Federalism Amendment: an assessment. Caron WR Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(2):87-111. PubMed ID: 11655614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dignity of life developments. Horan DJ Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 11650609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Can Congress create people? Buckley WF; Galebach SH; Bork R; Pilpel H Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(3):87-108. PubMed ID: 11655601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The collateral legal consequences of adopting a constitutional amendment on abortion. Pilpel HF Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1976 Jun; 5(3):44-8. PubMed ID: 11663668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics. Tatalovich R; Daynes BW Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Physicians and American political leadership. Jameson MG JAMA; 1983 Feb; 249(7):929-30. PubMed ID: 6337277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. State interference with personhood: the privacy right, necessity defense, and proscribed medical therapies. Stratton RT Pac Law J; 1979 Jul; 10(2):773-800. PubMed ID: 11661823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of the federal government in assisted reproductive technologies. Lal M Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 1997; 13(2):517-43. PubMed ID: 16528854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Human Life Bill: personhood revisited, or Congress takes aim at Roe v. Wade. Ferreira JG Hofstra Law Rev; 1982; 10(4):1269-95. PubMed ID: 11655632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible. Law SA Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. What is an embryo? Kiessling AA Conn Law Rev; 2004; 36(4):1051-92. PubMed ID: 15868674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Constitutional limits on the regulation of laboratory animal research. Garvin LT Yale Law J; 1988 Dec; 98(2):369-88. PubMed ID: 11650822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The children of ART (assisted reproductive technology): should the law protect them from harm? Rosato JL Utah Law Rev; 2004; 2004(1):57-110. PubMed ID: 16755703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The legacy of Infant Doe. Cosby MG Bayl Law Rev; 1982; 34(4):699-715. PubMed ID: 11651747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Infertility and the ADA: health insurance coverage for infertility treatment. Gilbert B Def Couns J; 1996; 63(1):42-57. PubMed ID: 11656749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The History of Health Law in the United States. Fuse Brown EC; Kesselheim AS N Engl J Med; 2022 Jul; 387(4):289-292. PubMed ID: 35939576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]