These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29950313)

  • 1. Redefining rapid reviews: a flexible framework for restricted systematic reviews.
    Plüddemann A; Aronson JK; Onakpoya I; Heneghan C; Mahtani KR
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2018 Dec; 23(6):201-203. PubMed ID: 29950313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A word about evidence: 'rapid reviews' or 'restricted reviews'?
    Aronson JK; Heneghan C; Mahtani KR; Plüddemann A
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2018 Dec; 23(6):204-205. PubMed ID: 29959158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are systematic reviews and meta-analyses still useful research? Yes.
    Annane D; Jaeschke R; Guyatt G
    Intensive Care Med; 2018 Apr; 44(4):512-514. PubMed ID: 29663046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Joanna Briggs Institute approach for systematic reviews.
    Santos WMD; Secoli SR; Püschel VAA
    Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2018 Nov; 26():e3074. PubMed ID: 30462787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scoping reviews.
    Harms MC; Goodwin VA
    Physiotherapy; 2019 Dec; 105(4):397-398. PubMed ID: 31732096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of mixed treatment comparisons in published systematic reviews shows marked increase since 2009.
    Lee AW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 67(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 24090930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Appraising the exercise oncology literature: a reminder of the rigour needed in systematic reviews.
    Neil-Sztramko SE; Winters-Stone KM; Bland KA; Campbell KL
    Br J Sports Med; 2019 Aug; 53(15):983-984. PubMed ID: 28341728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Methods of evidence mapping. A systematic review].
    Schmucker C; Motschall E; Antes G; Meerpohl JJ
    Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2013 Oct; 56(10):1390-7. PubMed ID: 23978984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When to include clinical study reports and regulatory documents in systematic reviews.
    Jefferson T; Doshi P; Boutron I; Golder S; Heneghan C; Hodkinson A; Jones M; Lefebvre C; Stewart LA
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2018 Dec; 23(6):210-217. PubMed ID: 30309870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic reviews and meta-analytic techniques.
    Baird R
    Semin Pediatr Surg; 2018 Dec; 27(6):338-344. PubMed ID: 30473037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The dilemma of lumping versus splitting evidence: Study design: systematic reviews.
    Lunyera J; Diamantidis CJ
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):458. PubMed ID: 29916204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic reviews, 'systematic reviews' and more: When variation leads to confusion.
    Marshall AP
    Aust Crit Care; 2018 Sep; 31(5):255-256. PubMed ID: 30217254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Summarising good practice guidelines for data extraction for systematic reviews and meta-analysis.
    Taylor KS; Mahtani KR; Aronson JK
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2021 Jun; 26(3):88-90. PubMed ID: 33632720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Caveat emptor: the combined effects of multiplicity and selective reporting.
    Li T; Mayo-Wilson E; Fusco N; Hong H; Dickersin K
    Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):497. PubMed ID: 30223876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 6: PRISMA-CI extension statement and checklist.
    Guise JM; Butler ME; Chang C; Viswanathan M; Pigott T; Tugwell P;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():43-50. PubMed ID: 28720516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consideration of health inequalities in systematic reviews: a mapping review of guidance.
    Maden M
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):202. PubMed ID: 27894332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews.
    Pollock A; Campbell P; Struthers C; Synnot A; Nunn J; Hill S; Goodare H; Morris J; Watts C; Morley R
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2019 Oct; 24(4):245-255. PubMed ID: 30997859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is the burns research community committed to filling in the gaps in the evidence? An analysis of the burns section of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
    Berner JE; Booth S; Dheansa B
    Burns; 2019 May; 45(3):741-742. PubMed ID: 30612887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Knowledge Synthesis in Evidence-Based Medicine.
    Garritty C; Stevens A; Hamel C; Golfam M; Hutton B; Wolfe D
    Semin Nucl Med; 2019 Mar; 49(2):136-144. PubMed ID: 30819393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.