These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Review of mixed treatment comparisons in published systematic reviews shows marked increase since 2009. Lee AW J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Feb; 67(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 24090930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Appraising the exercise oncology literature: a reminder of the rigour needed in systematic reviews. Neil-Sztramko SE; Winters-Stone KM; Bland KA; Campbell KL Br J Sports Med; 2019 Aug; 53(15):983-984. PubMed ID: 28341728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Methods of evidence mapping. A systematic review]. Schmucker C; Motschall E; Antes G; Meerpohl JJ Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2013 Oct; 56(10):1390-7. PubMed ID: 23978984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When to include clinical study reports and regulatory documents in systematic reviews. Jefferson T; Doshi P; Boutron I; Golder S; Heneghan C; Hodkinson A; Jones M; Lefebvre C; Stewart LA BMJ Evid Based Med; 2018 Dec; 23(6):210-217. PubMed ID: 30309870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The dilemma of lumping versus splitting evidence: Study design: systematic reviews. Lunyera J; Diamantidis CJ BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):458. PubMed ID: 29916204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic reviews, 'systematic reviews' and more: When variation leads to confusion. Marshall AP Aust Crit Care; 2018 Sep; 31(5):255-256. PubMed ID: 30217254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Summarising good practice guidelines for data extraction for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Taylor KS; Mahtani KR; Aronson JK BMJ Evid Based Med; 2021 Jun; 26(3):88-90. PubMed ID: 33632720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Caveat emptor: the combined effects of multiplicity and selective reporting. Li T; Mayo-Wilson E; Fusco N; Hong H; Dickersin K Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):497. PubMed ID: 30223876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 6: PRISMA-CI extension statement and checklist. Guise JM; Butler ME; Chang C; Viswanathan M; Pigott T; Tugwell P; J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():43-50. PubMed ID: 28720516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consideration of health inequalities in systematic reviews: a mapping review of guidance. Maden M Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):202. PubMed ID: 27894332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews. Pollock A; Campbell P; Struthers C; Synnot A; Nunn J; Hill S; Goodare H; Morris J; Watts C; Morley R J Health Serv Res Policy; 2019 Oct; 24(4):245-255. PubMed ID: 30997859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Is the burns research community committed to filling in the gaps in the evidence? An analysis of the burns section of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Berner JE; Booth S; Dheansa B Burns; 2019 May; 45(3):741-742. PubMed ID: 30612887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]