159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29951901)
1. Further Classification for Node-Positive Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.
Pak LM; Yang T; Wang J
J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Apr; 23(4):720-729. PubMed ID: 29951901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Colon Neuroendocrine Tumors: A New Lymph Node Staging Classification.
Fields AC; McCarty JC; Lu P; Vierra BM; Pak LM; Irani J; Goldberg JE; Bleday R; Chan J; Melnitchouk N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jul; 26(7):2028-2036. PubMed ID: 30927196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New lymph node staging for rectal neuroendocrine tumors.
Fields AC; McCarty JC; Ma-Pak L; Lu P; Irani J; Goldberg JE; Bleday R; Chan J; Melnitchouk N
J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jan; 119(1):156-162. PubMed ID: 30481376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metastatic lymph node ratio successfully predicts prognosis in western gastric cancer patients.
Kutlu OC; Watchell M; Dissanaike S
Surg Oncol; 2015 Jun; 24(2):84-8. PubMed ID: 25912951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union against cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification.
Ichikura T; Tomimatsu S; Uefuji K; Kimura M; Uchida T; Morita D; Mochizuki H
Cancer; 1999 Aug; 86(4):553-8. PubMed ID: 10440681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Problems in the N-classification of the new 1997 UICC TNM stage classification for gastric cancer: an analysis of over 10 years' outcome of Japanese patients.
Nio Y; Yamasawa K; Yamaguchi K; Itakura M; Omori H; Koike M; Kitamura Y; Tsuji M; Endo S; Ogo Y; Yano S; Sumi S
Anticancer Res; 2003; 23(1B):697-705. PubMed ID: 12680170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.
Alatengbaolide ; Lin D; Li Y; Xu H; Chen J; Wang B; Liu C; Lu P
Am J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 22547011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) may have low clinical utility in gastric cancer patients treated by limited lymphadenectomy: results from a single-center experience of 526 patients.
Pedrazzani C; Sivins A; Ancans G; Marrelli D; Corso G; Krumins V; Roviello F; Leja M
World J Surg; 2010 Jan; 34(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 20020295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric carcinoma: a better prognostic factor than number of metastatic lymph nodes?
Lee SY; Hwang I; Park YS; Gardner J; Ro JY
Int J Oncol; 2010 Jun; 36(6):1461-7. PubMed ID: 20428770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of prognostic significance of nodal staging between old (4th edition) and new (5th edition) UICC TNM classification for gastric carcinoma. International Union Against Cancer.
Yoo CH; Noh SH; Kim YI; Min JS
World J Surg; 1999 May; 23(5):492-7; discussion 497-8. PubMed ID: 10085399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Prognostic significance of the ratio of lymph node metastatic in 5-year survival after curative gastrectomy for advanced gastric carcinoma].
Marín Córdova NE; Yan-Quiroz EF; Díaz Plasencia J; Churango Barreto K; Calvanapon Prado P; Salazar Abad S
Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2017; 37(3):217-224. PubMed ID: 29093584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metastatic lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer.
Asoglu O; Karanlik H; Parlak M; Kecer M; Muslumanoglu M; Igci A; Ozmen V; Gulluoglu M; Kapran Y
Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(91-92):908-13. PubMed ID: 19621727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes: is UICC/TNM node classification perfectly suitable for early gastric cancer?
Huang B; Zheng X; Wang Z; Wang M; Dong Y; Zhao B; Xu H
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 18998065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparison of three lymph node staging systems in predicting overall survival for gastric cancer patients after radical resection].
Luo C; Zhang G; Wang W; Zhou Z; Zhang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 19(10):1107-1112. PubMed ID: 27781245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New Nodal Staging for Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-institutional and National Data Analysis.
Zhang XF; Xue F; Dong DH; Lopez-Aguiar AG; Poultsides G; Makris E; Rocha F; Kanji Z; Weber S; Fisher A; Fields R; Krasnick BA; Idrees K; Smith PM; Cho C; Beems M; Lv Y; Maithel SK; Pawlik TM
Ann Surg; 2021 Jul; 274(1):e28-e35. PubMed ID: 31356277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does a minimum number of 16 retrieved nodes affect survival in curatively resected gastric cancer?
Biondi A; D'Ugo D; Cananzi FC; Papa V; Borasi A; Sicoli F; Degiuli M; Doglietto G; Persiani R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jun; 41(6):779-86. PubMed ID: 25899981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Status and Extent of Lymphadenectomy in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Confined To and Extending Beyond the Pancreas.
Conrad C; Kutlu OC; Dasari A; Chan JA; Vauthey JN; Adams DB; Kim M; Fleming JB; Katz MH; Lee JE
J Gastrointest Surg; 2016 Dec; 20(12):1966-1974. PubMed ID: 27714644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic impact of positive lymph node ratio in gastric carcinoma.
Celen O; Yildirim E; Berberoglu U
J Surg Oncol; 2007 Aug; 96(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 17443727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The prognostic value of harvested lymph nodes and the metastatic lymph node ratio for gastric cancer patients: results of a study of 1,101 patients.
Chen S; Zhao BW; Li YF; Feng XY; Sun XW; Li W; Zhou ZW; Zhan YQ; Qian CN; Chen YB
PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49424. PubMed ID: 23166665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative effect of lymph node metastasis classified by the anatomical site or by the number of nodes involved on prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.
Hidaka H; Eto T; Maehara N; Jimi S; Hotokezaka M; Chijiiwa K
Hepatogastroenterology; 2008; 55(88):2269-72. PubMed ID: 19260520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
