These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29951971)

  • 1. Higher-Order Asymptotics and Its Application to Testing the Equality of the Examinee Ability Over Two Sets of Items.
    Sinharay S; Jensen JL
    Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):484-510. PubMed ID: 29951971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The choice of the ability estimate with asymptotically correct standardized person-fit statistics.
    Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 May; 69(2):175-93. PubMed ID: 27062601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cheating on Unproctored Internet Test Applications: An Analysis of a Verification Test in a Real Personnel Selection Context.
    Aguado D; Vidal A; Olea J; Ponsoda V; Barrada JR; Abad FJ
    Span J Psychol; 2018 Dec; 21():E62. PubMed ID: 30501646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymptotically Correct Standardization of Person-Fit Statistics Beyond Dichotomous Items.
    Sinharay S
    Psychometrika; 2016 Dec; 81(4):992-1013. PubMed ID: 25953476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are Exam Questions Known in Advance? Using Local Dependence to Detect Cheating.
    Zimmermann S; Klusmann D; Hampe W
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(12):e0167545. PubMed ID: 27907190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Which Statistic Should Be Used to Detect Item Preknowledge When the Set of Compromised Items Is Known?
    Sinharay S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Sep; 41(6):403-421. PubMed ID: 29881099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting Cheating Methods on Unproctored Internet Tests.
    Sanz S; Luzardo M; García C; Abad FJ
    Psicothema; 2020 Nov; 32(4):549-558. PubMed ID: 33073761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of item scores and response times to detect examinees who may have benefited from item preknowledge.
    Sinharay S; Johnson MS
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73(3):397-419. PubMed ID: 31418458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some Remarks on Applications of Tests for Detecting A Change Point to Psychometric Problems.
    Sinharay S
    Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):1149-1161. PubMed ID: 27770307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Caught in the Act: Predicting Cheating in Unproctored Knowledge Assessment.
    Steger D; Schroeders U; Wilhelm O
    Assessment; 2021 Apr; 28(3):1004-1017. PubMed ID: 32354221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian Checks on Cheating on Tests.
    van der Linden WJ; Lewis C
    Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):689-706. PubMed ID: 24915988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of Discontinue Rules on Psychometric Properties of Test Scores.
    von Davier M; Cho Y; Pan T
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):147-163. PubMed ID: 30607661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Item analysis for the written test of Taiwanese board certification examination in anaesthesiology using the Rasch model.
    Chang KY; Tsou MY; Chan KH; Chang SH; Tai JJ; Chen HH
    Br J Anaesth; 2010 Jun; 104(6):717-22. PubMed ID: 20427368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical item analysis of the examination in anesthesiology for medical students using the Rasch model.
    Yang SC; Tsou MY; Chen ET; Chan KH; Chang KY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2011 Mar; 74(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 21421207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Item Response Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: A Common Framework.
    Brown A
    Psychometrika; 2016 Mar; 81(1):135-60. PubMed ID: 25663304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two New Models for Item Preknowledge.
    Gorney K; Wollack JA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Sep; 46(6):447-461. PubMed ID: 35991826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adaptive testing for psychological assessment: how many items are enough to run an adaptive testing algorithm?
    Wagner-Menghin MM; Masters GN
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 23816590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Penalized partial likelihood inference of proportional hazards latent trait models.
    Kang HA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):187-208. PubMed ID: 27958648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Planning a Study for Testing the Rasch Model given Missing Values due to the use of Test-booklets.
    Yanagida T; Kubinger KD; Rasch D
    J Appl Meas; 2015; 16(4):432-42. PubMed ID: 26771570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.