These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Predicted binding site information improves model ranking in protein docking using experimental and computer-generated target structures. Maheshwari S; Brylinski M BMC Struct Biol; 2015 Nov; 15():23. PubMed ID: 26597230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A New Scoring Function for Molecular Docking Based on AutoDock and AutoDock Vina. Tanchuk VY; Tanin VO; Vovk AI; Poda G Curr Drug Discov Technol; 2015; 12(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26302746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Improved performance in CAPRI round 37 using LZerD docking and template-based modeling with combined scoring functions. Peterson LX; Shin WH; Kim H; Kihara D Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):311-320. PubMed ID: 28845596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Functions Derived from Rigid and Flexible Decoy Structures: Evaluation with the 2013 and 2014 CSAR Benchmarks. Yan C; Grinter SZ; Merideth BR; Ma Z; Zou X J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1013-21. PubMed ID: 26389744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Rapid Design of Knowledge-Based Scoring Potentials for Enrichment of Near-Native Geometries in Protein-Protein Docking. Sasse A; de Vries SJ; Schindler CE; de Beauchêne IC; Zacharias M PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170625. PubMed ID: 28118389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. On the analysis of protein-protein interactions via knowledge-based potentials for the prediction of protein-protein docking. Feliu E; Aloy P; Oliva B Protein Sci; 2011 Mar; 20(3):529-41. PubMed ID: 21432933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. New benchmark metrics for protein-protein docking methods. Gao M; Skolnick J Proteins; 2011 May; 79(5):1623-34. PubMed ID: 21365685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Exploring the potential of global protein-protein docking: an overview and critical assessment of current programs for automatic ab initio docking. Huang SY Drug Discov Today; 2015 Aug; 20(8):969-77. PubMed ID: 25801181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Probabilistic models for capturing more physicochemical properties on protein-protein interface. Guo F; Li SC; Du P; Wang L J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1798-809. PubMed ID: 24881460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Novel Consensus Docking Strategy to Improve Ligand Pose Prediction. Ren X; Shi YS; Zhang Y; Liu B; Zhang LH; Peng YB; Zeng R J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1662-1668. PubMed ID: 30044626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Introducing a Clustering Step in a Consensus Approach for the Scoring of Protein-Protein Docking Models. Chermak E; De Donato R; Lensink MF; Petta A; Serra L; Scarano V; Cavallo L; Oliva R PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166460. PubMed ID: 27846259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. RRDB: a comprehensive and non-redundant benchmark for RNA-RNA docking and scoring. Yan Y; Huang SY Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 34(3):453-458. PubMed ID: 29028888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Recent Advances in Protein-Protein Docking. Zhang Q; Feng T; Xu L; Sun H; Pan P; Li Y; Li D; Hou T Curr Drug Targets; 2016; 17(14):1586-1594. PubMed ID: 26758670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]