These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29953387)

  • 21. Towards a realistic biomechanical model of the thumb: the choice of kinematic description may be more critical than the solution method or the variability/uncertainty of musculoskeletal parameters.
    Valero-Cuevas FJ; Johanson ME; Towles JD
    J Biomech; 2003 Jul; 36(7):1019-30. PubMed ID: 12757811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An optimization-based simultaneous approach to the determination of muscular, ligamentous, and joint contact forces provides insight into musculoligamentous interaction.
    Cleather DJ; Bull AM
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Jul; 39(7):1925-34. PubMed ID: 21445690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of Direct Collocation Optimal Control Problem Formulations for Solving the Muscle Redundancy Problem.
    De Groote F; Kinney AL; Rao AV; Fregly BJ
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Oct; 44(10):2922-2936. PubMed ID: 27001399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prediction of ground reaction forces and moments during various activities of daily living.
    Fluit R; Andersen MS; Kolk S; Verdonschot N; Koopman HF
    J Biomech; 2014 Jul; 47(10):2321-9. PubMed ID: 24835471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predictions of antagonistic muscular activity using nonlinear optimization.
    Herzog W; Binding P
    Math Biosci; 1992 Oct; 111(2):217-29. PubMed ID: 1515744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Human muscle modelling from a user's perspective.
    van den Bogert AJ; Gerritsen KG; Cole GK
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 1998 Apr; 8(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 9680952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Muscle forces predicted using optimization methods are coordinate system dependent.
    Pierce JE; Li G
    J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):695-702. PubMed ID: 15713289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A 'cheap' optimal control approach to estimate muscle forces in musculoskeletal systems.
    Menegaldo LL; de Toledo Fleury A; Weber HI
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(10):1787-95. PubMed ID: 16033695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A hybrid static optimisation method to estimate muscle forces during muscle co-activation.
    Son J; Hwang S; Kim Y
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2012; 15(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 21302162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predictions of co-contraction depend critically on degrees-of-freedom in the musculoskeletal model.
    Jinha A; Ait-Haddou R; Herzog W
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 16549102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of muscle forces and joint moments using a forward-inverse dynamics model.
    Buchanan TS; Lloyd DG; Manal K; Besier TF
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2005 Nov; 37(11):1911-6. PubMed ID: 16286861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A task-specific validation of homogeneous non-linear optimisation approaches.
    Jinha A; Ait-Haddou R; Kaya M; Herzog W
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Aug; 259(4):695-700. PubMed ID: 19406130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Anticipatory control of center of mass and joint stability during voluntary arm movement from a standing posture: interplay between active and passive control.
    Patla AE; Ishac MG; Winter DA
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 143(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 11889509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Static optimization of muscle forces during gait in comparison to EMG-to-force processing approach.
    Heintz S; Gutierrez-Farewik EM
    Gait Posture; 2007 Jul; 26(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 17071088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements.
    Erdemir A; McLean S; Herzog W; van den Bogert AJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):131-54. PubMed ID: 17070969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Critical analysis of musculoskeletal modelling complexity in multibody biomechanical models of the upper limb.
    Quental C; Folgado J; Ambrósio J; Monteiro J
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2015; 18(7):749-59. PubMed ID: 24156405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimation of the muscle force distribution in ballistic motion based on a multibody methodology.
    Czaplicki A; Silva M; Ambrósio J; Jesus O; Abrantes J
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 16880156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Joint moments and contact forces in the foot during walking.
    Kim Y; Lee KM; Koo S
    J Biomech; 2018 Jun; 74():79-85. PubMed ID: 29735264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Human Leg Model Predicts Muscle Forces, States, and Energetics during Walking.
    Markowitz J; Herr H
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 May; 12(5):e1004912. PubMed ID: 27175486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A model of the upper extremity for simulating musculoskeletal surgery and analyzing neuromuscular control.
    Holzbaur KR; Murray WM; Delp SL
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2005 Jun; 33(6):829-40. PubMed ID: 16078622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.