These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29953443)

  • 1. Contribution of the periosteum to mandibular distraction.
    Debelmas A; Picard A; Kadlub N; Boisson J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199116. PubMed ID: 29953443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical characterization of soft-tissue stiffness during mandibular distraction.
    Bildstein AC; Dubois G; Preud'homme R; Rouch P; Veyssière A; Bénateau H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Jul; 52(7):860-864. PubMed ID: 38796333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of cortical bone perforation on periosteal distraction: an experimental study in the rabbit mandible.
    Oda T; Kinoshita K; Ueda M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 67(7):1478-85. PubMed ID: 19531421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Distraction osteogenesis in an anterior mandibular bone defect utilizing lingual periosteal release: a case report.
    Gellrich NC; Suarez-Cunqueiro MM; Schön R; Hoffmann M; Schramm A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(5):753-7. PubMed ID: 15508994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tensile mechanical strain up-regulates Runx2 and osteogenic factor expression in human periosteal cells: implications for distraction osteogenesis.
    Kanno T; Takahashi T; Ariyoshi W; Tsujisawa T; Haga M; Nishihara T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 63(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 15789322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histomorphometrical analysis of new bone obtained by distraction osteogenesis and osteogenesis by periosteal distraction in rabbits.
    Sencimen M; Aydintug YS; Ortakoglu K; Karslioglu Y; Gunhan O; Gunaydin Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 17142009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mandibular distraction force: laboratory data and clinical correlation.
    Robinson RC; O'Neal PJ; Robinson GH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 May; 59(5):539-44; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 11326380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. VEGF facilitates periosteal distraction-induced osteogenesis in rabbits: a micro-computerized tomography study.
    Casap N; Venezia NB; Wilensky A; Samuni Y
    Tissue Eng Part A; 2008 Feb; 14(2):247-53. PubMed ID: 18333777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible: histomorphometric evaluation of bone.
    Glowacki J; Shusterman EM; Troulis M; Holmes R; Perrott D; Kaban LB
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Feb; 113(2):566-73. PubMed ID: 14758219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of local simvastatin on periosteal distraction osteogenesis in rabbits.
    Kahraman OE; Erdogan Ö; Namli H; Sencar L
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):e18-22. PubMed ID: 25640700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers.
    Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regeneration of the mandibular head from grafted periosteum.
    Ueno T; Kagawa T; Fukunaga J; Mizukawa N; Kanou M; Fujii T; Sugahara T; Yamamoto T
    Ann Plast Surg; 2003 Jul; 51(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 12838129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in mandibular distraction osteogenesis after corticotomy and osteotomy.
    Hu J; Li J; Wang D; Buckley MJ; Agarwal S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Apr; 31(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 12102418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bilateral mandibular distraction in adult dogs with an epiperiosteal distractor.
    Hasse AR; Pörksen M; Zimmermann CE
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 43(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 15749209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Guided bone generation in a rabbit mandible model after periosteal expansion with an osmotic tissue expander.
    Abrahamsson P; Isaksson S; Andersson G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1282-8. PubMed ID: 21985285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the effects of guided bone regeneration and periosteum on newly formed bone in a distraction gap.
    Kilic E; Alkan A; Demetoglu U; Ozturk M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1871-4. PubMed ID: 21959452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A biomechanical comparison between human calvarial bone and a skull simulant considering the role of attached periosteum and dura mater.
    Ondruschka B; Lee JHC; Scholze M; Zwirner J; Tong D; Waddell JN; Hammer N
    Int J Legal Med; 2019 Sep; 133(5):1603-1610. PubMed ID: 31203433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distraction osteogenesis with subperiosteal devices in edentulous mandibles.
    Enislidis G; Fock N; Ewers R
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 43(5):399-403. PubMed ID: 15908080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of a mechanical testing system for a mandibular distraction wound.
    Perrott DH; Rahn B; Wahl D; Linke B; Thurüller P; Troulis M; Glowacki J; Kaban LB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 14759112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of the hyperbaric oxygen on de novo bone formation during periosteal distraction.
    Suer BT; Ortakoglu K; Gunaydin Y; Sencimen M; Mutlu I; Dogan N; Kaya A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1740-5. PubMed ID: 25148643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.