These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29954223)

  • 1. Designs of Empirical Evaluations of Nonexperimental Methods in Field Settings.
    Wong VC; Steiner PM
    Eval Rev; 2018 Apr; 42(2):176-213. PubMed ID: 29954223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing Correspondence Between Experimental and Nonexperimental Estimates in Within-Study Comparisons.
    Steiner PM; Wong VC
    Eval Rev; 2018 Apr; 42(2):214-247. PubMed ID: 29772913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What Can Be Learned From Empirical Evaluations of Nonexperimental Methods?
    Wong VC; Steiner PM; Anglin KL
    Eval Rev; 2018 Apr; 42(2):147-175. PubMed ID: 30317886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions.
    Shadish WR; Cook TD
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2009; 60():607-29. PubMed ID: 18616391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quasi-Experimental Designs for Causal Inference.
    Kim Y; Steiner P
    Educ Psychol; 2016; 51(3-4):395-405. PubMed ID: 30100637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of occupational health interventions using a randomized controlled trial: challenges and alternative research designs.
    Schelvis RM; Oude Hengel KM; Burdorf A; Blatter BM; Strijk JE; van der Beek AJ
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2015 Sep; 41(5):491-503. PubMed ID: 26030719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical Power for the Comparative Regression Discontinuity Design With a Pretest No-Treatment Control Function: Theory and Evidence From the National Head Start Impact Study.
    Tang Y; Cook TD
    Eval Rev; 2018 Feb; 42(1):71-110. PubMed ID: 29888613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How Within-Study Comparisons can Inform Research and Evaluation Design for the Third Sector.
    Anderson KP; Wolf PJ
    Voluntas; 2022; 33(6):1235-1244. PubMed ID: 35233150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions Provide Unbiased Effect Estimates? A Systematic Review of Internal Replication Studies.
    Waddington HS; Villar PF; Valentine JC
    Eval Rev; 2023 Jun; 47(3):563-593. PubMed ID: 36047928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs in implementation research.
    Miller CJ; Smith SN; Pugatch M
    Psychiatry Res; 2020 Jan; 283():112452. PubMed ID: 31255320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Validity of the Comparative Interrupted Time Series Design for Evaluating the Effect of School-Level Interventions.
    Jacob R; Somers MA; Zhu P; Bloom H
    Eval Rev; 2016 Jun; 40(3):167-198. PubMed ID: 27553034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 6: risk of bias assessment.
    Waddington H; Aloe AM; Becker BJ; Djimeu EW; Hombrados JG; Tugwell P; Wells G; Reeves B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():43-52. PubMed ID: 28351693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inclusion of quasi-experimental studies in systematic reviews of health systems research.
    Rockers PC; Røttingen JA; Shemilt I; Tugwell P; Bärnighausen T
    Health Policy; 2015 Apr; 119(4):511-21. PubMed ID: 25776033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The validity of causal claims with repeated measures designs: A within-study comparison evaluation of differences-in-differences and the comparative interrupted time series.
    Anglin KL; Wong VC; Wing C; Miller-Bains K; McConeghy K
    Eval Rev; 2023 Oct; 47(5):895-931. PubMed ID: 37072684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Strong quasi-experimental designs for research on the effectiveness of rehabilitation.
    Johnston MV; Ottenbacher KJ; Reichardt CS
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1995; 74(5):383-92. PubMed ID: 7576417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 2: complementary approaches to advancing global health knowledge.
    Geldsetzer P; Fawzi W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():12-16. PubMed ID: 28365307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quasi experimental evaluation of public health interventions (author's transl)].
    Patrick DL
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1981; 29(3):245-53. PubMed ID: 7302309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Can synthetic controls improve causal inference in interrupted time series evaluations of public health interventions?
    Degli Esposti M; Spreckelsen T; Gasparrini A; Wiebe DJ; Bonander C; Yakubovich AR; Humphreys DK
    Int J Epidemiol; 2021 Jan; 49(6):2010-2020. PubMed ID: 33005920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A reconsideration of operations research experimental designs.
    Reynolds J
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1991; 371():377-94. PubMed ID: 1956897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. False Dichotomies and Health Policy Research Designs: Randomized Trials Are Not Always the Answer.
    Soumerai SB; Ceccarelli R; Koppel R
    J Gen Intern Med; 2017 Feb; 32(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 27757714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.