These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29954323)

  • 1. Numerical analysis of the impact of flow rate, heart rate, vessel geometry, and degree of stenosis on coronary hemodynamic indices.
    Malota Z; Glowacki J; Sadowski W; Kostur M
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2018 Jun; 18(1):132. PubMed ID: 29954323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of endothelial shear stress in patients with mild or intermediate coronary stenoses using coronary computed tomography angiography: comparison with invasive coronary angiography.
    Huang D; Muramatsu T; Li Y; Yang W; Nagahara Y; Chu M; Kitslaar P; Sarai M; Ozaki Y; Chatzizisis YS; Yan F; Reiber JHC; Wu R; Pu J; Tu S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 33(7):1101-1110. PubMed ID: 27796815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fractional flow reserve-based 4D hemodynamic simulation of time-resolved blood flow in left anterior descending coronary artery.
    Zhao Y; Ping J; Yu X; Wu R; Sun C; Zhang M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2019 Dec; 70():164-169. PubMed ID: 31525657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CT-based total vessel plaque analyses improves prediction of hemodynamic significance lesions as assessed by fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina pectoris.
    Øvrehus KA; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Jensen JM; Dey D; Bøtker HE; Ahmadi A; Achenbach S; Ko B; Nørgaard BL
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(4):344-349. PubMed ID: 29866619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Noninvasive CT-Derived FFR Based on Structural and Fluid Analysis: A Comparison With Invasive FFR for Detection of Functionally Significant Stenosis.
    Ko BS; Cameron JD; Munnur RK; Wong DTL; Fujisawa Y; Sakaguchi T; Hirohata K; Hislop-Jambrich J; Fujimoto S; Takamura K; Crossett M; Leung M; Kuganesan A; Malaiapan Y; Nasis A; Troupis J; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jun; 10(6):663-673. PubMed ID: 27771399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of image resolution on computation of fractional flow reserve: coronary computed tomography angiography versus 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Liu L; Yang W; Nagahara Y; Li Y; Lamooki SR; Muramatsu T; Kitslaar P; Sarai M; Ozaki Y; Barlis P; Yan F; Reiber JH; Tu S
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Mar; 32(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 26507326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Coronary Artery Axial Plaque Stress and its Relationship With Lesion Geometry: Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Coronary CT Angiography.
    Choi G; Lee JM; Kim HJ; Park JB; Sankaran S; Otake H; Doh JH; Nam CW; Shin ES; Taylor CA; Koo BK
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Oct; 8(10):1156-1166. PubMed ID: 26363834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Comparative Method Based on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography for Assessing the Hemodynamic Significance of Coronary Artery Stenosis.
    Małota Z; Sadowski W; Pieszko K; Zimoląg R; Czekała F; Malinowska R; Hiczkiewicz J
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2023 Jun; 14(3):364-379. PubMed ID: 36869267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient-Specific Hemodynamics of New Coronary Artery Bypass Configurations.
    Rezaeimoghaddam M; Oguz GN; Ates MS; Bozkaya TA; Piskin S; Samaneh Lashkarinia S; Tenekecioglu E; Karagoz H; Pekkan K
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2020 Dec; 11(6):663-678. PubMed ID: 33051831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic performance of quantitative coronary computed tomography angiography and quantitative coronary angiography to predict hemodynamic significance of intermediate-grade stenoses.
    Ghekiere O; Dewilde W; Bellekens M; Hoa D; Couvreur T; Djekic J; Coolen T; Mancini I; Vanhoenacker PK; Dendale P; Nchimi A
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1651-61. PubMed ID: 26323355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coronary CT angiography derived fractional flow reserve: Methodology and evaluation of a point of care algorithm.
    Coenen A; Lubbers MM; Kurata A; Kono A; Dedic A; Chelu RG; Dijkshoorn ML; van Geuns RJ; Schoebinger M; Itu L; Sharma P; Nieman K
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 26747231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography reclassification rate using value distal to lesion compared to lowest value.
    Kueh SH; Mooney J; Ohana M; Kim U; Blanke P; Grover R; Sellers S; Ellis J; Murphy D; Hague C; Bax JJ; Nørgaard BL; Rabbat M; Leipsic JA
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017 Nov; 11(6):462-467. PubMed ID: 28986147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diffuse coronary artery disease among other atherosclerotic plaque characteristics by coronary computed tomography angiography for predicting coronary vessel-specific ischemia by fractional flow reserve.
    Rizvi A; Hartaigh BÓ; Danad I; Han D; Lee JH; Gransar H; Szymonifka J; Lin FY; Min JK
    Atherosclerosis; 2017 Mar; 258():145-151. PubMed ID: 28168977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries.
    Tu S; Barbato E; Köszegi Z; Yang J; Sun Z; Holm NR; Tar B; Li Y; Rusinaru D; Wijns W; Reiber JH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):768-77. PubMed ID: 25060020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accurate quantification of vessel cross-sectional area using CT angiography: a simulation study.
    Molloi S; Johnson T; Ding H; Lipinski J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Mar; 33(3):411-419. PubMed ID: 27838897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of myocardial perfusion parameters in an ex-vivo porcine heart model using third generation dual-source CT.
    Pelgrim GJ; Duguay TM; Stijnen JM; Varga-Szemes A; Van Tuijl S; Schoepf UJ; Oudkerk M; Vliegenthart R
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(2):141-147. PubMed ID: 28202246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of coronary artery blood flow using OpenFOAM: Validation with the food and drug administration benchmark nozzle model.
    Ali S; Ho CY; Yang CC; Chou SH; Chen ZY; Huang WC; Shih TC
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2024; 32(4):1121-1136. PubMed ID: 38788116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic performance of machine-learning-based computed fractional flow reserve (FFR) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography for the assessment of myocardial ischemia verified by invasive FFR.
    Hu X; Yang M; Han L; Du Y
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 34(12):1987-1996. PubMed ID: 30062537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computational fluid dynamic measures of wall shear stress are related to coronary lesion characteristics.
    Park JB; Choi G; Chun EJ; Kim HJ; Park J; Jung JH; Lee MH; Otake H; Doh JH; Nam CW; Shin ES; De Bruyne B; Taylor CA; Koo BK
    Heart; 2016 Oct; 102(20):1655-61. PubMed ID: 27302987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relationship of the Duke jeopardy score combined with minimal lumen diameter as assessed by computed tomography angiography to the hemodynamic relevance of coronary artery stenosis.
    Yu M; Zhao Y; Li W; Lu Z; Wei M; Zhou W; Zhang J
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(3):247-254. PubMed ID: 29598929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.