These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29954332)

  • 21. Validation of a Machine Learning Model That Outperforms Clinical Risk Scoring Systems for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Shung DL; Au B; Taylor RA; Tay JK; Laursen SB; Stanley AJ; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Schultz M; Laine L
    Gastroenterology; 2020 Jan; 158(1):160-167. PubMed ID: 31562847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of risk scoring systems in predicting clinical outcome at upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients in an emergency unit.
    Dicu D; Pop F; Ionescu D; Dicu T
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Jan; 31(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 23000328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance of the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting clinical outcomes and intervention in hospitalized patients with upper GI bleeding.
    Bryant RV; Kuo P; Williamson K; Yam C; Schoeman MN; Holloway RH; Nguyen NQ
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Oct; 78(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 23790755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Different scoring systems to predict 6-week mortality in cirrhosis patients with acute variceal bleeding: a retrospective analysis of 202 patients.
    Wang F; Cui S; Wang F; Li F; Tang F; Zhang X; Gao Y; Lv H
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018; 53(7):885-890. PubMed ID: 29911438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prognostic value of risk scoring systems for cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding.
    Tantai XX; Liu N; Yang LB; Wei ZC; Xiao CL; Song YH; Wang JH
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Dec; 25(45):6668-6680. PubMed ID: 31832005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of three scoring systems in predicting clinical outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a prospective observational study.
    Zhong M; Chen WJ; Lu XY; Qian J; Zhu CQ
    J Dig Dis; 2016 Dec; 17(12):820-828. PubMed ID: 27930875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality.
    Martínez-Cara JG; Jiménez-Rosales R; Úbeda-Muñoz M; de Hierro ML; de Teresa J; Redondo-Cerezo E
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2016 Jun; 4(3):371-9. PubMed ID: 27403303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Comparison between Glascow-Blatchford, Rockall and AIMS65 scores in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
    Espinoza-Ríos J; Aguilar Sánchez V; Bravo Paredes EA; Pinto Valdivia J; Huerta-Mercado Tenorio J
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2016; 36(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 27409091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
    Budimir I; Gradišer M; Nikolić M; Baršić N; Ljubičić N; Kralj D; Budimir I
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prediction of adverse outcomes using non-endoscopic scoring systems in patients over 80 years of age who present with the upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Bardakçı O; Sıddıkoğlu D; Akdur G; Şimşek G; Atalay Ü; Das M; Akdur O; Beyazit Y
    Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg; 2022 Jan; 28(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 34967427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of Pre-Endoscopic C-WATCH Score with Established Risk Assessment Tools in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Allo G; Bürger M; Gillessen J; Kasper P; Franklin J; Mück V; Nierhoff D; Steffen HM; Goeser T; Schramm C
    Dig Dis; 2022; 40(6):826-834. PubMed ID: 35073555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the quick SOFA score with Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scores in predicting severity in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Taslidere B; Sonmez E; Özcan AB; Mehmetaj L; Keskin EB; Gulen B
    Am J Emerg Med; 2021 Jul; 45():29-36. PubMed ID: 33647759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Is the AIMS 65 Score Useful in Prepdicting Clinical Outcomes in Korean Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?
    Choe JW; Kim SY; Hyun JJ; Jung SW; Jung YK; Koo JS; Yim HJ; Lee SW
    Gut Liver; 2017 Nov; 11(6):813-820. PubMed ID: 28798285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing AIMS65 Score With MEWS, qSOFA Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Cirrhotic Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Lai YC; Hung MS; Chen YH; Chen YC
    J Acute Med; 2018 Dec; 8(4):154-167. PubMed ID: 32995218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A modified Glasgow Blatchford Score improves risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleed: a prospective comparison of scoring systems.
    Cheng DW; Lu YW; Teller T; Sekhon HK; Wu BU
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2012 Oct; 36(8):782-9. PubMed ID: 22928529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Age, blood tests and comorbidities and AIMS65 risk scores outperform Glasgow-Blatchford and pre-endoscopic Rockall score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Morarasu BC; Sorodoc V; Haisan A; Morarasu S; Bologa C; Haliga RE; Lionte C; Marciuc EA; Elsiddig M; Cimpoesu D; Dimofte GM; Sorodoc L
    World J Clin Cases; 2023 Jul; 11(19):4513-4530. PubMed ID: 37469720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Can Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Pre-endoscopic Rockall Score Predict the Occurrence of Hypotension in Initially Normotensive Patients with Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding?].
    Kim JS; Ko BS; Son CH; Ahn S; Seo DW; Lee YS; Lee JH; Oh BJ; Lim KS; Kim WY
    Korean J Gastroenterol; 2016 Jan; 67(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 26809627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of scoring systems for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective cohort study.
    Yang HM; Jeon SW; Jung JT; Lee DW; Ha CY; Park KS; Lee SH; Yang CH; Park JH; Park YS;
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Jan; 31(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 26211939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Shock Index is not accurate at predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Saffouri E; Blackwell C; Laursen SB; Laine L; Dalton HR; Ngu J; Shultz M; Norton R; Stanley AJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2020 Jan; 51(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 31642558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Safe discharge of patients with low-risk upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB): can the use of Glasgow-Blatchford Bleeding Score be extended?
    Le Jeune IR; Gordon AL; Farrugia D; Manwani R; Guha IN; James MW
    Acute Med; 2011; 10(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 22111089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.